World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 57 1753 1573 842 744 225 14926

Sera L. Young publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sera L. Young between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sera L. Young published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2020. 31 of the 307 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2020. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

307 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sera L. Young: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 2
2008 2
2009 5
2010 5
2011 21
2012 17
2013 9
2014 11
2015 19
2016 22
2017 17
2018 17
2019 24
2020 32
2021 26
2022 19
2023 17
2024 10
2025 30
2026 1
Total 307
Download as CSV

Sera L. Young publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sera L. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 225 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 225
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Sera L. Young D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sera L. Young sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129 57
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Andrew Carnegie Fellow

Overview

Sera L. Young is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has established a research profile primarily in Nursing, with an emphasis on Nutrition and Dietetics.

Their research spans several subfields, including Nutrition and Dietetics, General Health Professions, Safety Research, Ocean Engineering, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Key research topics explored by Sera L. Young include:

  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Recent notable publications authored or coauthored by Sera L. Young include:

  • "Exposing the myths of household water insecurity in the global north: A critical review" (2020), published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • "Perspective: The Importance of Water Security for Ensuring Food Security, Good Nutrition, and Well-being" (2021), published in Advances in Nutrition
  • "Knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: A systematic literature review" (2020), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "The toll of household water insecurity on health and human biology: Current understandings and future directions" (2020), published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • "Water Security and Nutrition: Current Knowledge and Research Opportunities" (2021), published in Advances in Nutrition

The researcher collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Joshua D. Miller
  • Edward A. Frongillo
  • Hilary J. Bethancourt
  • Asher Y. Rosinger
  • Amber Wutich

Sera L. Young's work has been published regularly in venues such as:

  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Nutrition
  • BMJ Global Health
  • American Journal of Human Biology

In 2019, the researcher received the Andrew Carnegie Fellow award.

Best Publications

  • Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.

    Godfred O. Boateng;Torsten B. Neilands;Edward A. Frongillo;Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez

  • What Are We Assessing When We Measure Food Security? A Compendium and Review of Current Metrics

    Andrew D. Jones;Francis M. Ngure;Gretel Pelto;Sera L. Young

  • Conceptual framework for understanding the bidirectional links between food insecurity and HIV/AIDS

    Sheri D Weiser;Sera L Young;Sera L Young;Craig R Cohen;Margot B Kushel

  • The Household Water InSecurity Experiences (HWISE) Scale: development and validation of a household water insecurity measure for low-income and middle-income countries.

    Sera L. Young;Godfred O. Boateng;Zeina Jamaluddine;Joshua D. Miller

  • A review of the role of food insecurity in adherence to care and treatment among adult and pediatric populations living with HIV and AIDS

    Sera Young;Amanda C. Wheeler;Sandra I. McCoy;Sheri D. Weiser

  • Advancing human capabilities for water security: A relational approach

    Wendy Jepson;Jessica Budds;Laura Eichelberger;Leila Harris

  • Progress in household water insecurity metrics: a cross-disciplinary approach

    Wendy E. Jepson;Amber Wutich;Shalean M. Colllins;Godfred O. Boateng

  • A systematic review of the human health and social well-being outcomes of green infrastructure for stormwater and flood management.

    Vidya Venkataramanan;Aaron I. Packman;Daniel R. Peters;Denise Lopez

  • Pica in Pregnancy: New Ideas About an Old Condition

    Sera L. Young

  • Why on earth?: Evaluating hypotheses about the physiological functions of human geophagy.

    Sera L. Young;Paul W. Sherman;Julius B. Lucks;Gretel H. Pelto

  • Perspective: The Importance of Water Security for Ensuring Food Security, Good Nutrition, and Well-being

    Sera L Young;Edward A Frongillo;Zeina Jamaluddine;Hugo Melgar-Quiñonez

  • Breastfeeding Self-efficacy: A Critical Review of Available Instruments.

    Emily L. Tuthill;Jacqueline M. McGrath;Melanie Graber;Regina M. Cusson

  • Exposing the myths of household water insecurity in the global north: A critical review

    Katie Meehan;Wendy Jepson;Leila M. Harris;Amber Wutich

  • A meta-analysis of pica and micronutrient status.

    Diana Miao;Sera L. Young;Christopher D. Golden

  • Role of Women's Empowerment in Child Nutrition Outcomes: A Systematic Review

    Marianne V Santoso;Rachel Bezner Kerr;John Hoddinott;Priya Garigipati

  • 'I know how stressful it is to lack water!' Exploring the lived experiences of household water insecurity among pregnant and postpartum women in western Kenya.

    Shalean M. Collins;Patrick Mbullo Owuor;Joshua D. Miller;Godfred O. Boateng

  • Knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: A systematic literature review.

    Vidya Venkataramanan;Denise Lopez;David J. McCuskey;Daniel Kiefus

  • Social determinants lived experiences and consequences of household food insecurity among persons living with HIV/AIDS on the shore of Lake Victoria Kenya.

    Jason M. Nagata;Richard O. Magerenge;Sera L. Young;Joel O. Oguta

  • Association of Pica with Anemia and Gastrointestinal Distress among Pregnant Women in Zanzibar, Tanzania

    Sera L. Young;Sabra S. Khalfan;Tamer H. Farag;Justine A. Kavle

  • Reliability and validity of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale in screening for depression among HIV-infected and -uninfected pregnant women attending antenatal services in northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

    Barnabas K Natamba;Barnabas K Natamba;Jane Achan;Angela Arbach;Thomas O Oyok

Frequent Co-Authors

Amber Wutich
Amber Wutich Arizona State University
Edwin D. Charlebois
Edwin D. Charlebois University of California, San Francisco
Rebecca J. Stoltzfus
Rebecca J. Stoltzfus Cornell University
Alexandra Brewis
Alexandra Brewis Arizona State University
Diane V. Havlir
Diane V. Havlir University of California, San Francisco
Edward A. Frongillo
Edward A. Frongillo University of South Carolina
Moses R. Kamya
Moses R. Kamya Makerere University
Torsten B. Neilands
Torsten B. Neilands University of California, San Francisco
Elizabeth A. Bukusi
Elizabeth A. Bukusi University of Washington
Matthew C. Freeman
Matthew C. Freeman Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a broad array of online learning opportunities in the USA. For those seeking a quick transition into advanced roles, one year masters programs offer a fast yet rigorous path to postgraduate credentials—ideal if you're ready to specialize or move into leadership.

If you’re starting your academic journey, online bachelor degree programs give you the flexibility to study at your own pace and balance other commitments. These programs help lay the foundation for a multitude of careers in social advocacy, policy analysis, and community engagement.

In-demand fields such as social work and behavioral analysis also offer tailored online options. Students interested in helping individuals and communities thrive can pursue affordable options through msw programs, while those focused on behavioral health can consider bcba certification programs to qualify for roles in education and therapy.

Choosing an online path can help you access quality education, build in-demand skills, and expand your career possibilities in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Sera L. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles