World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roland Frankenberger

Roland Frankenberger

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
61
Citations
11072
World Ranking
6882
National Ranking
401

Roland Frankenberger publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Frankenberger sits on this spectrum.

50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 170 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

Roland Frankenberger D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Frankenberger sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roland Frankenberger is affiliated with Philipp University of Marburg in Germany, where their research primarily addresses various aspects of dentistry. Their academic contributions span multiple fields, with a predominant focus on dentistry and its subfields.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Dentistry

Within dentistry, Frankenberger's research covers several subfields:

  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics
  • General Dentistry
  • Emergency Medical Services

The topics most frequently explored by Frankenberger comprise:

  • Dental materials and restorations
  • Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Dental Erosion and Treatment
  • Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Oral microbiology and periodontitis research

Frankenberger has contributed to notable papers including:

  • "Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations-recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting" (2022), published in Clinical Oral Investigations
  • "Ceramic laminate veneers: effect of preparation design and ceramic thickness on fracture resistance and marginal quality in vitro" (2020), published in Clinical Oral Investigations
  • "Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document" (2022), published in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
  • "Prevalence of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH) among 6-12-year-old children in Central Hesse (Germany)" (2020), published in Clinical Oral Investigations
  • "Active MMP-8 point-of-care (PoC)/chairside enzyme-test as an adjunctive tool for early and real-time diagnosis of peri-implantitis" (2022), published in Clinical and Experimental Dental Research

Frequent collaborators in Frankenberger's research include:

  • Norbert Krämer
  • Stefanie Amend
  • Julia Winter
  • Matthias J. Roggendorf
  • Susanne Lücker

Their academic work is published in several established venues, notably:

  • PubMed
  • Clinical Oral Investigations
  • European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
  • Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde
  • Dental Materials

Best Publications

  • ‘No-bottle’ vs ‘multi-bottle’ dentin adhesives—a microtensile bond strength and morphological study

    Roland Frankenberger;Jorge Perdigão;B T Rosa;Maria M Lopes

  • A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives.

    Ricardo M. Carvalho;Stefano Chersoni;Roland Frankenberger;David H. Pashley

  • Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.

    Roland Frankenberger;Franklin Chi Meng Tay

  • Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.

    N Krämer;U Lohbauer;R Frankenberger

  • Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite

    Matthias J. Roggendorf;Norbert Krämer;Andreas Appelt;Michael Naumann

  • Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation.

    Frankenberger R;Krämer N;Petschelt A

  • Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence.

    Franklin Russell Tay;R. Frankenberger;I Krejci;S. Bouillaguet

  • Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.

    Norbert Krämer;Roland Frankenberger

  • Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin

    Sergej A. Nikolaenko;Ulrich Lohbauer;Matthias Roggendorf;Anselm Petschelt

  • Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?

    Roland Frankenberger;Ulrich Lohbauer;Matthias J Roggendorf;Michael Naumann

  • Light curing of resin-based composites in the LED era.

    Norbert Krämer;Ulrich Lohbauer;Franklin García-Godoy;Franklin García-Godoy;Roland Frankenberger

  • Characterisation of resin-dentine interfaces by compressive cyclic loading.

    Roland Frankenberger;David Henry Pashley;Sven M. Reich;Ulrich Lohbauer

  • Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts

    Michael Naumann;Anja Preuss;Roland Frankenberger

  • Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations.

    R Frankenberger;N Krämer;J Sindel

  • Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.

    Roland Frankenberger;Ulrich Lohbauer;Rainer B. Schaible;Sergej A. Nikolaenko

  • Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives.

    Roland Frankenberger;Norbert Krämer;Anselm Petschelt

  • Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.

    R Frankenberger;J Sindel;N Krämer;A Petschelt

  • The anti-adherence activity and bactericidal effect of microparticulate silver additives in composite resin materials.

    Ralf Bürgers;Andreas Eidt;Roland Frankenberger;Martin Rosentritt

  • New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion

    Jorge Perdigão;Roland Frankenberger;Bruno T. Rosa;Lorenzo Breschi

  • Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives.

    Ulrich Lohbauer;Roland Frankenberger;Norbert Krämer;Anselm Petschelt

Frequent Co-Authors

Anselm Petschelt
Anselm Petschelt University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ulrich Lohbauer
Ulrich Lohbauer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Martin Rosentritt
Martin Rosentritt University of Regensburg
Lorenzo Breschi
Lorenzo Breschi University of Bologna
Reinhard Hickel
Reinhard Hickel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Franklin R. Tay
Franklin R. Tay Augusta University
Jorge Perdigão
Jorge Perdigão University of Minnesota
Albert J. Feilzer
Albert J. Feilzer Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam
Ricardo M. Carvalho
Ricardo M. Carvalho University of British Columbia
Eugen Domann
Eugen Domann University of Giessen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Roland Frankenberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles