World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 83 2959 2665 162 144 442 23599

Richard M. Lambert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard M. Lambert between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard M. Lambert published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 1997. 3 of the 452 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 1997. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 2 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 7 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 7 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 14 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 13 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 16 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 16 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 21 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1966 2025

452 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard M. Lambert: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 1
1968 1
1969 1
1970 2
1971 3
1972 1
1973 2
1974 3
1975 1
1976 7
1977 6
1978 7
1979 6
1980 6
1981 14
1982 3
1983 13
1984 6
1985 4
1986 7
1987 13
1988 16
1989 18
1990 16
1991 7
1992 14
1993 14
1994 12
1995 17
1996 14
1997 21
1998 12
1999 9
2000 21
2001 11
2002 17
2003 12
2004 5
2005 16
2006 16
2007 13
2008 8
2009 11
2010 11
2011 1
2012 2
2013 2
2014 3
2015 4
2016 2
2017 4
2018 3
2019 4
2020 0
2021 1
2022 3
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
Total 452
Download as CSV

Richard M. Lambert publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 442 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270 442
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard M. Lambert D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292 83
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard M. Lambert is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, with particular attention to catalysis, history and philosophy of science, genetics, materials chemistry, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their scholarly work includes multiple publications across diverse subjects. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Support Induced Effects on the Ir Nanoparticles Activity, Selectivity and Stability Performance under CO2 Reforming of Methane" (2021, Nanomaterials)
  • "In vitro anaerobic incubation: a reliable method to predict the potential of nitrogen mineralization after grassland ploughing" (2024, BASE)
  • "Educator Perspectives on a Kindergarten Entry Assessment: Implementation Experiences, Support, and Data Utilization" (2024, Perspectives on early childhood psychology and education /Perspectives on early childhood psychology and education)
  • "Bild-ing Science: The Multiplicity of Bild-Types in Boltzmann" (2023, Foundations of Science)
  • "Reliability Evidence for the NC Teacher Evaluation Process Using a Variety of Indicators of Inter-Rater Agreement" (2022, Journal of Educational Supervision)

Their research interests are clustered around several main topics such as catalytic processes in materials science, catalysts for methane reforming, catalysis and oxidation reactions, educational and psychological assessments, philosophy, science and history, philosophy and history of science, and slime mold and myxomycetes research.

Lambert frequently collaborates with other researchers. Among their frequent co-authors are Thibaut Cugnon, Jacques Mahillon, T. Scott Holcomb, Gernot Waldner, and Ersi Nikolaraki. These collaborations reflect the interdisciplinary and multi-institutional nature of their research endeavors.

Their work has appeared in a variety of publication venues, predominantly in:

  • Proceedings of the 2021 AERA Annual Meeting
  • Nanomaterials
  • BASE
  • Perspectives on early childhood psychology and education /Perspectives on early childhood psychology and education
  • Foundations of Science

This range of venues highlights engagement with fields from materials science to educational psychology and philosophy of science, underscoring the breadth of their academic interests and expertise.

Best Publications

  • Selective oxidation with dioxygen by gold nanoparticle catalysts derived from 55-atom clusters

    Mark Turner;Vladimir B. Golovko;Vladimir B. Golovko;Owain P. H. Vaughan;Pavel Abdulkin

  • Effective Visible Light-Activated B-Doped and B,N-Codoped TiO2 Photocatalysts

    Suil In;Alexander Orlov;Regina Berg;Felipe García

  • New insights into the origin of visible light photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped and oxygen-deficient anatase TiO2.

    Zheshuai Lin;Alexander Orlov;Richard M. Lambert;Michael C. Payne

  • A single crystal study of the silver-catalysed selective oxidation and total oxidation of ethylene

    Robert B. Grant;Richard M. Lambert

  • Chemisorption and Reactivity on Supported Clusters and Thin Films

    Richard M. Lambert;Gianfranco Pacchioni

  • Adsorption-desorption properties and surface structural chemistry of chlorine on Cu(111) and Ag(111)

    P.J Goddard;R.M Lambert

  • Critical influence of the amorphous silica-to-cristobalite phase transition on the performance of Mn/Na2WO4/SiO2 catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane

    A. Palermo;J. P. Holgado Vazquez;M. S. Tikhov;R. M. Lambert

  • Structural and catalytic properties of novel Au/Pd bimetallic colloid particles. EXAFS, XRD, and acetylene coupling

    Adam F. Lee;Christopher J. Baddeley;Christopher Hardacre;R. Mark Ormerod

  • Effect of support oxygen storage capacity on the catalytic performance of Rh nanoparticles for CO2 reforming of methane

    Ioannis V. Yentekakis;Grammatiki Goula;Maria Hatzisymeon;Ioanna Betsi-Argyropoulou

  • Photoelectron spectroscopy and heterogeneous catalysis: Benzene and ethylene from acetylene on palladium (111)

    W.T. Tysoe;G.L. Nyberg;R.M. Lambert

  • Chemisorption studies on cobalt single crystal surfaces: I. Carbon monoxide on Co(0001)

    M.E. Bridge;C.M. Comrie;R.M. Lambert

  • Basic studies of the oxygen surface chemistry of silver: Chemisorbed atomic and molecular species on pure Ag(111)

    R.B. Grant;R.M. Lambert

  • Copper as a selective catalyst for the epoxidation of propene

    Owain P.H. Vaughan;Georgios Kyriakou;Norman Macleod;Mintcho Tikhov

  • Sonogashira coupling on an extended gold surface in vacuo: reaction of phenylacetylene with iodobenzene on Au(111).

    Vijay K. Kanuru;Georgios Kyriakou;Simon K. Beaumont;Anthoula C. Papageorgiou

  • The oxidation of CO by no on Pt(111) and Pt(110)

    R.M. Lambert;C.M. Comrie

  • Low-basicity oxygen atoms: a key in the search for propylene epoxidation catalysts.

    Daniel Torres;Nuria Lopez;Francesc Illas;Richard M. Lambert

  • The adsorption of nitric oxide on Pt(111) and Pt(110) surfaces

    C.M. Comrie;W.H. Weinberg;R.M. Lambert

  • A photoelectron diffraction study of ordered structures in the chemisorption system Pd{111}-CO

    Tatjana Gießel;Oliver Schaff;C. J. Hirschmugl;V. Fernandez

  • A simple, controllable source for dosing molecular halogens in UHV

    N. D. Spencer;P. J. Goddard;P. W. Davies;M. Kitson

  • Adsorption and absorption of diatomic gases by zirconium: Studies of the dissociation and diffusion of CO, NO, N2, O2 and D2

    J.S. Foord;P.J. Goddard;R.M. Lambert

  • Heterogeneous alkene epoxidation: past, present and future

    Richard M. Lambert;Federico J. Williams;Rachael L. Cropley;Alejandra Palermo

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Hardacre
Christopher Hardacre University of Manchester
Adam F. Lee
Adam F. Lee Griffith University
Jas Pal Singh Badyal
Jas Pal Singh Badyal Durham University
Wilfred T. Tysoe
Wilfred T. Tysoe University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Karen Wilson
Karen Wilson Griffith University
Michalis Konsolakis
Michalis Konsolakis Technical University of Crete
Agustín R. González-Elipe
Agustín R. González-Elipe Spanish National Research Council
Andrew J. Gellman
Andrew J. Gellman Carnegie Mellon University
David A. Jefferson
David A. Jefferson University of Cambridge
E. Charles H. Sykes
E. Charles H. Sykes Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that often intersect with health, law enforcement, and pharmaceuticals. For instance, pursuing a degree in pharmaceutical sciences can lead to roles such as pharmaceutical sales representatives, where you can explore how much do drug reps make and understand the sales industry's dynamics. This career typically requires strong communication skills combined with a solid chemistry background.

Another prominent path is becoming a pharmacist, a profession known for its stable demand and competitive salary. Learning about pharmacist salary helps prospective students gauge the financial benefits of rigorous training and licensure required to enter this field. Pharmacists play a vital role in healthcare, leveraging their chemistry knowledge to dispense medications safely.

Chemistry graduates may also consider specialized roles like autopsy technicians, crucial in forensic investigations. By reviewing autopsy technician salary and job outlook, aspiring professionals can assess the practical and financial aspects of this career that combines biology and chemistry.

For those interested in forensic science, enrolling in one of the best online colleges for forensic science programs can be an excellent choice. These programs often integrate chemistry coursework with criminal justice, preparing students for careers in forensic analysis.

Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways can provide valuable insights and help you make informed decisions about your educational and professional future in chemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Lambert

Trending Scientists