World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Raymond J. Rodgers

Raymond J. Rodgers

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
13033
World Ranking
18227
National Ranking
531

Raymond J. Rodgers publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond J. Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 167 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Raymond J. Rodgers D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond J. Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond J. Rodgers is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and has a significant body of research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields, notably Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Agronomy and Crop Science.

The scientist's research topics focus on areas related to reproductive biology and fertility, ovarian function and disorders, reproductive physiology in livestock, ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment, birth, development, and health, hormonal regulation and hypertension, and Kruppel-like factors research.

Some of the recent papers by Raymond J. Rodgers include:

  • Adipocyte and steroidogenic cell cross-talk in polycystic ovary syndrome, 2021, Human Reproduction Update
  • High-intensity training elicits greater improvements in cardio-metabolic and reproductive outcomes than moderate-intensity training in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized clinical trial, 2022, Human Reproduction
  • Could perturbed fetal development of the ovary contribute to the development of polycystic ovary syndrome in later life?, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Maternal periconceptional and first trimester protein restriction in beef heifers: effects on placental parameters and fetal and neonatal calf development, 2020, Reproduction Fertility and Development
  • Candidate genes for polycystic ovary syndrome are regulated by TGFβ in the bovine foetal ovary, 2022, Human Reproduction

Rodgers frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including Katja Hummitzsch, Rhiannon K. Patten, Andrew J. McAinch, Alba Moreno-Asso, and Nigel K. Stepto. These collaborations are reflected across various publications, suggesting a broad network in reproductive and molecular biology research.

The scientist has published extensively in several journals. The most frequent publication venues include Human Reproduction, PLoS ONE, Reproduction Fertility and Development, Journal of the Endocrine Society, and Biology of Reproduction. This range of journals indicates a focus on reproductive science, endocrinology, and developmental biology.

Best Publications

  • Preface to the IssueMolecular and Cellular Endocrinology: Special Issue: Endocrine Cell Lines

    William Rainey;Raymond Rodgers

  • Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome

    Helena J. Teede;Helena J. Teede;Marie L. Misso;Marie L. Misso;Michael F. Costello;Anuja Dokras

  • Formation of the Ovarian Follicular Antrum and Follicular Fluid

    Raymond J. Rodgers;Helen Frances Irving-Rodgers

  • Cellular composition of the cyclic corpus luteum of the cow

    J. D. O'Shea;R. J. Rodgers;M. J. D'Occhio

  • Extracellular matrix of the developing ovarian follicle.

    Raymond J Rodgers;Helen F Irving-Rodgers;Darryl L Russell

  • Morphological characterization of bovine primordial follicles and their environment in vivo.

    I L van Wezel;R J Rodgers

  • Cytochromes P-450scc, P-45017α, Adrenodoxin, and Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate-Cytochrome P-450 Reductase in Bovine Follicles and Corpora Lutea. Changes in Specific Contents during the Ovarian Cycle*

    R. J. Rodgers;M. R. Waterman;E. R. Simpson

  • Extracellular Matrix of Ovarian Tumors

    Carmela Ricciardelli;Raymond J. Rodgers

  • A new model of development of the mammalian ovary and follicles.

    Katja Hummitzsch;Helen F. Irving-Rodgers;Helen F. Irving-Rodgers;Nicholas Hatzirodos;Wendy Bonner

  • LARGE LUTEAL CELLS THE SOURCE OF LUTEAL OXYTOCIN IN THE SHEEP

    R.J. Rodgers;J.D. O’Shea;J.K. Findlay;A.P.F. Flint

  • Changes in content of cytochrome P450(17)alpha, cytochrome P450scc, and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase in developing rat ovarian follicles and corpora lutea: correlation with theca cell steroidogenesis.

    Lars Hedin;Raymond J. Rodgers;Evan R. Simpson;Joanne S. Richards

  • Transcriptome profiling of granulosa cells from bovine ovarian follicles during atresia.

    Nicholas Hatzirodos;Katja Hummitzsch;Helen F Irving-Rodgers;Helen F Irving-Rodgers;Margaret L Harland

  • Molecular composition of the peri-islet basement membrane in NOD mice: a barrier against destructive insulitis.

    Helen Irving-Rodgers;Andrew Ziolkowski;Christopher Parish;Yoshikazu Sado

  • The insulin-like growth factor, somatomedin C, induces the synthesis of cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P-450 and adrenodoxin in ovarian cells.

    J D Veldhuis;R J Rodgers;A Dee;E R Simpson

  • Stem Cells, Progenitor Cells, and Lineage Decisions in the Ovary

    Katja Hummitzsch;Richard A. Anderson;Dagmar Wilhelm;Ji Wu

  • Translation and implementation of the Australian-led PCOS guideline: clinical summary and translation resources from the International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

    Helena J Teede;Helena J Teede;Marie L Misso;Marie L Misso;Jacqueline A Boyle;Jacqueline A Boyle;Rhonda M Garad;Rhonda M Garad

  • Extracellular matrix in ovarian follicular development and disease.

    Helen F. Irving-Rodgers;Raymond J. Rodgers

  • Anchorage-Independent Culture of Bovine Granulosa Cells: The Effects of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor and Dibutyryl cAMP on Cell Division and Differentiation

    Tina C. Lavranos;Helen F. Rodgers;Ivan Bertoncello;Raymond J. Rodgers

  • Evidence summaries and recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: assessment and treatment of infertility

    M F Costello;M L Misso;A Balen;J Boyle

  • Dynamics of the membrana granulosa during expansion of the ovarian follicular antrum

    R.J Rodgers;H.F Irving-Rodgers;I.L van Wezel;M Krupa

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Norman
Robert J. Norman University of Adelaide
Helena J. Teede
Helena J. Teede Monash University
Jock K. Findlay
Jock K. Findlay Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Richard A. Anderson
Richard A. Anderson University of Edinburgh
Michael W. Parker
Michael W. Parker University of Melbourne
Yoshifumi Ninomiya
Yoshifumi Ninomiya Okayama University
Hugh H. Harris
Hugh H. Harris University of Adelaide
Darryl L. Russell
Darryl L. Russell University of Adelaide
Michael J. Davies
Michael J. Davies University of Copenhagen
Michael J. D'Occhio
Michael J. D'Occhio University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore options in Biology and Biochemistry, it’s worth considering a range of related online degrees and career pathways in healthcare and life sciences. These programs often provide flexibility for working professionals or students balancing multiple commitments.

Careers such as medical billing and coding are in demand, offering roles where detail-oriented skills are critical. If you’re interested in this area, learn about the medical billing and coding outlook, including job prospects and the pros and cons of this career.

Managing health data is another option, and accredited online programs make it easy to start. Discover top choices by reviewing the health information management online degree programs and their affordability.

If nutrition science interests you, consider the cheapest online nutrition degree options, which balance quality and cost for master's candidates.

For those drawn to medical technology, explore accredited ultrasound tech programs online. These blend foundational science knowledge with practical clinical skills for careers in diagnostic imaging.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond J. Rodgers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles