| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 57 | 4384 | 4025 | 1985 | 1793 | 207 | 10276 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Rachel Saunders-Pullman between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rachel Saunders-Pullman published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2010. 11 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.
227 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1997 | 1 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2 |
| 2000 | 2 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2004 | 3 |
| 2005 | 5 |
| 2006 | 4 |
| 2007 | 2 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2009 | 7 |
| 2010 | 20 |
| 2011 | 8 |
| 2012 | 9 |
| 2013 | 16 |
| 2014 | 14 |
| 2015 | 13 |
| 2016 | 14 |
| 2017 | 10 |
| 2018 | 13 |
| 2019 | 15 |
| 2020 | 11 |
| 2021 | 18 |
| 2022 | 9 |
| 2023 | 11 |
| 2024 | 6 |
| 2025 | 5 |
| Total | 227 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel Saunders-Pullman sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 207 publications — 64th percentile
64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | 207 |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel Saunders-Pullman sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile
56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | 57 |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
Laurie J. Ozelius;Geetha Senthil;Rachel Saunders-Pullman;Erin Ohmann
Mikhail Bogdanov;Wayne R. Matson;Lei Wang;Theodore Matson
Tania Fuchs;Sophie Gavarini;Rachel Saunders-Pullman;Rachel Saunders-Pullman;Deborah Raymond
Tania Fuchs;Rachel Saunders-Pullman;Rachel Saunders-Pullman;Ikuo Masuho;Marta San Luciano
R. Saunders-Pullman;J. Gordon-Elliott;M. Parides;S. Fahn
Susan B Bressman;Susan B Bressman;Deborah Raymond;Tania Fuchs;Gary A Heiman
L. Almasy;S. B. Bressman;D. Raymond;P. L. Kramer
Ziv Gan-Or;Laurie J. Ozelius;Anat Bar-Shira;Rachel Saunders-Pullman
Anat Mirelman;Hagar Bernad-Elazari;Avner Thaler;Eytan Giladi-Yacobi
Karen Marder;Yuanjia Wang;Roy N Alcalay;Helen Mejia-Santana
R. Saunders-Pullman;J. Shriberg;G. Heiman;D. Raymond
Rachel Saunders-Pullman;Anat Mirelman;Roy N Alcalay;Cuiling Wang
Rachel Saunders‐Pullman;Rachel Saunders‐Pullman;Carol Derby;Kaili Stanley;Alicia Floyd
Ziv Gan‐Or;Ziv Gan‐Or;Anat Mirelman;Ronald B. Postuma;Isabelle Arnulf
A. Schmidt;H. C. Jabusch;H. C. Jabusch;E. Altenmüller;J. Hagenah
Unknown
Rachel Saunders-Pullman
J. Hagenah;R. Saunders-Pullman;K. Hedrich;K. Kabakci
C. W. Hess;D. Raymond;P. de Carvalho Aguiar;S. Frucht
Alice S. Chen-Plotkin;Roger Albin;Roy Alcalay;Debra Babcock
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.