World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Economics and Finance
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
59
Citations
19355
World Ranking
862
National Ranking
94

Paul Geroski publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Geroski sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Paul Geroski D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Geroski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Paul Geroski was affiliated with the London Business School in the United Kingdom. Their academic contributions were primarily situated within the context of this institution.

Throughout their career, Geroski published research, although no specific recent papers are detailed in the available data. Likewise, there are no records of frequent co-authors, suggesting independent contributions or diverse collaboration patterns not captured here.

No particular publication venues were noted as frequent targets for their work. Similarly, there are no listed book publications associated with Geroski, indicating a professional focus largely on articles or other formats of academic dissemination.

The data does not specify main fields of study or subfields, nor does it identify particular topics of work, which limits insight into the precise academic domains Geroski contributed to within their discipline.

There are no awards recorded in the dataset related to Geroski's career, and their year of death is confirmed though not dated.

Best Publications

  • What do we know about entry

    P.A. Geroski

  • Models of technology diffusion

    P.A Geroski

  • The Profitability of Innovating Firms

    Geroski Geroski;Stephen Machin;John Van Reenen

  • The Firm and the Market: Studies on Multinational Enterprise and the Scope of the Firm.

    P. A. Geroski;Mark Casson

  • Founding Conditions and the Survival of New Firms

    Paul A. Geroski;José Mata;Pedro Portugal

  • INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY, AND MARKET STRUCTURE

    Unknown

  • Market dynamics and entry

    Paul Geroski

  • Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets

    Constantinos Markides;Paul Geroski

  • HOW PERSISTENTLY DO FIRMS INNOVATE

    P.A. Geroski;J. Van Reenen;C.F. Walters

  • Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity

    Paul Geroski

  • The Persistence of Profits - a European Comparison

    Paul A. Geroski;Alexis Jacquemin

  • Innovative Activity over the Business Cycle

    P. A. Geroski;C. F. Walters

  • Corporate Growth and Profitability

    Paul A. Geroski;Stephen J. Machin;Christopher F. Walters

  • Do Innovating Firms Outperform Non‐Innovators?*

    Paul Geroski;Steve Machin

  • The Convergence of Profits in the Long Run: Inter-firm and Inter-industry Comparisons

    Unknown

  • Entry, Innovation and Productivity Growth

    Paul A. Geroski

  • Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison

    Paul Geroski;Joachim Schwalbach

  • Coping with Recession: UK Company Performance in Adversity

    Paul Gregg;Paul A. Geroski

  • Changes in Concentration, Turbulence, and the Dynamics of Market Shares

    S. W. Davies;Paul A. Geroski

  • Learning and the sources of corporate growth

    Paul Geroski;Mariana Mazzucato

  • An Applied Econometrician's View of Large Company Performance

    Paul A Geroski

  • The Dynamics of Industrial Competition: A North American Perspective.

    P. A. Geroski;John R. Baldwin

  • The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring.

    Paul A. Geroski;Michael H. Best

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexis Jacquemin
Alexis Jacquemin Université Catholique de Louvain
Mariana Mazzucato
Mariana Mazzucato University College London
John Van Reenen
John Van Reenen London School of Economics and Political Science
Paul Gregg
Paul Gregg University of Bath
Stephen Machin
Stephen Machin London School of Economics and Political Science
Klaus Gugler
Klaus Gugler Vienna University of Economics and Business
Alistair Ulph
Alistair Ulph University of Manchester
Rachel Griffith
Rachel Griffith University of Manchester
Pedro Portugal
Pedro Portugal Banco de Portugal
Richard J. Gilbert
Richard J. Gilbert University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore opportunities in Economics and Finance, it’s helpful to consider related online degrees that can broaden your skill set and career possibilities. For instance, an office management associate degree offers essential administrative and managerial skills, ideal for those interested in supporting business operations or office environments.

For professionals aiming to specialize further, an online masters in human resources focuses on leadership and workforce management—skills crucial for financial institutions and large organizations.

As data-driven decision-making becomes increasingly vital, pursuing an online data analytics masters enables graduates to analyze economic trends, interpret financial data, and provide strategic insights.

Finally, a master's organizational leadership online prepares students for high-level roles that require leading teams, managing change, and developing business strategies—highly relevant skills in both economics and finance sectors.

By combining Economics and Finance studies with these in-demand programs, graduates can unlock versatile career pathways in government, business, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Geroski

Recently Published Articles