World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
48
Citations
10995
World Ranking
4044
National Ranking
1744

Olen C. Yoder publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olen C. Yoder sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 93 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Olen C. Yoder D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olen C. Yoder sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1990 - Fellow of the American Phytopathological Society

Overview

Olen C. Yoder is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. The academic's work has received recognition within the field of phytopathology, evidenced by the award of Fellow of the American Phytopathological Society in 1990.

The profile of their research work spans various topics and fields of study, although specific details regarding those areas are not documented here.

There are no available records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or major publication venues connected to Olen C. Yoder that can be referenced at this time.

Similarly, information regarding book publications, subfields of study, and the specific main topics of their research has not been provided.

Best Publications

  • Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium

    Li Jun Ma;H. Charlotte Van Der Does;Katherine A. Borkovich;Jeffrey J. Coleman

  • Phylogenomic analysis of type I polyketide synthase genes in pathogenic and saprobic ascomycetes

    Scott Kroken;N. Louise Glass;John W. Taylor;O. C. Yoder

  • Split-Marker Recombination for Efficient Targeted Deletion of Fungal Genes

    Natalie L. Catlett;Bee-Na Lee;O. C. Yoder;B. Gillian Turgeon

  • Toxins in Pathogenesis

    O C Yoder

  • Proposed nomenclature for mating type genes of filamentous ascomycetes.

    B. G. Turgeon;O. C. Yoder

  • Whole-Genome Analysis of Two-Component Signal Transduction Genes in Fungal Pathogens

    Natalie L. Catlett;Olen C. Yoder;B. Gillian Turgeon

  • Tagged mutations at the Tox1 locus of Cochliobolus heterostrophus by restriction enzyme-mediated integration.

    Shunwen Lu;L. Lyngholm;Ge Yang;C. Bronson

  • Isolation of DNA from filamentous fungi and separation into nuclear, mitochondrial, ribosomal, and plasmid components.

    Robert C. Garber;O.C. Yoder

  • Development of a fungal transformation system based on selection of sequences with promoter activity.

    B G Turgeon;R C Garber;O C Yoder

  • Molecular organization of mating type loci in heterothallic, homothallic, and asexual Gibberella/Fusarium species.

    Sung-Hwan Yun;Tsutomu Arie;Isao Kaneko;O.C. Yoder

  • Evolution of the fungal self-fertile reproductive life style from self-sterile ancestors

    Yun Sh;Berbee Ml;Yoder Oc;Turgeon Bg

  • A polyketide synthase is required for fungal virulence and production of the polyketide T-toxin.

    G Yang;M S Rose;B G Turgeon;O C Yoder

  • Methods for Selection of Mutants and In Vitro Culture of Cochliobolus heterostrophus

    J. Leach;B. R. Lang;O. C. Yoder

  • A G PROTEIN ALPHA SUBUNIT FROM COCHLIOBOLUS HETEROSTROPHUS INVOLVED IN MATING AND APPRESSORIUM FORMATION

    Benjamin A. Horwitz;Amir Sharon;Shun-Wen Lu;Vladimir Ritter

  • Cloning and analysis of the mating type genes from Cochliobolus heterostrophus

    B. G. Turgeon;H. Bohlmann;L. M. Ciuffetti;S. K. Christiansen

  • Efficient cloning of Ascomycete mating type genes by PCR amplification of the conserved MAT HMG box

    T. Arie;S.K. Christiansen;O.C. Yoder;B.G. Turgeon

  • Transformation of the fungal maize pathogen Cochliobolus heterostrophus using the Aspergillus nidulans amdS gene

    B. Gillian Turgeon;Robert C. Garber;O. C. Yoder

  • Functional analysis of all nonribosomal peptide synthetases in Cochliobolus heterostrophus reveals a factor, NPS6, involved in virulence and resistance to oxidative stress.

    Bee-Na Lee;Scott Kroken;David Y. T. Chou;Barbara Robbertse

  • Fungal genomics and pathogenicity.

    O.C Yoder;B.Gillian Turgeon

  • Genetic nomenclature and practice for plant pathogenic fungi.

    O. C. Yoder;B. Valent;F. Chumley

Frequent Co-Authors

B. Gillian Turgeon
B. Gillian Turgeon Cornell University
Wilhelm Schäfer
Wilhelm Schäfer Universität Hamburg
Benjamin A. Horwitz
Benjamin A. Horwitz Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Elizabeth D. Earle
Elizabeth D. Earle Cornell University
Richard C. Staples
Richard C. Staples Boyce Thompson Institute
Hans D. VanEtten
Hans D. VanEtten University of Arizona
Scott E. Baker
Scott E. Baker Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Gary C. Bergstrom
Gary C. Bergstrom Cornell University
Tsutomu Arie
Tsutomu Arie Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
Etienne G. J. Danchin
Etienne G. J. Danchin INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA opens the door to various health science careers, many of which offer flexible online learning options. If you’re interested in blending genetics with direct patient care, degree paths in nursing and medical assistance are worth exploring.

For registered nurses seeking further education, there are rn to bsn no clinical hours programs that allow you to earn your BSN entirely online, saving time and eliminating traditional clinical requirements. Those aiming for the highest levels of nursing can consider accelerated dnp programs, helping you achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree on a faster timeline.

If you prefer to enter the workforce quickly, there are medical assistant programs accelerated that enable you to gain medical skills and certification in as little as six weeks. Finally, if you’re searching for the right doctoral nursing school, discover your options with dnp school rankings to find a program that fits your goals and schedule.

These flexible and accelerated pathways offer valuable alternatives and can complement a background in genetics, helping you build a diverse and rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Olen C. Yoder