World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6481 3134 81 5721

Mitchell B. Chamlin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mitchell B. Chamlin between 1983 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mitchell B. Chamlin published across 39 years, from 1983 to 2021, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2006. 1 of the 81 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2006. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1983 2021

81 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mitchell B. Chamlin: publications per year, 1983 to 2021
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 3
1990 2
1991 2
1992 3
1993 1
1994 3
1995 2
1996 4
1997 3
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 6
2007 4
2008 5
2009 3
2010 1
2011 2
2012 2
2013 4
2014 3
2015 0
2016 2
2017 3
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
Total 81
Download as CSV

Mitchell B. Chamlin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell B. Chamlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 81 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 81
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mitchell B. Chamlin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell B. Chamlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mitchell B. Chamlin was affiliated with Texas State University in the United States. Their research work spanned several interdisciplinary fields including Medicine, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Health Professions.

Their main areas of study covered subfields such as Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics, and General Health Professions. The research topics they focused on included Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets, and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations.

Chamlin published scholarly work primarily in the Journal of Crime and Justice. The documented publication includes:

  • An examination of the unintended consequences of the legalization of recreational marijuana on alcohol-related behaviors, 2021, Journal of Crime and Justice

Their work contributed to research exploring the intersections of public health, economic behavior, and societal outcomes related to substance use policies. Although no frequent co-authors were listed, their work was situated at the convergence of epidemiological and economic analyses within health services research.

Best Publications

  • Social Structure and Crime Control Among Macrosocial Units

    Allen E. Liska;Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • Academic dishonesty and low self‐control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime

    John K. Cochran;Peter B. Wood;Christine S. Sellers;Wendy Wilkerson

  • ASSESSING MESSNER AND ROSENFELD'S INSTITUTIONAL ANOMIE THEORY: A PARTIAL TEST*

    Mitchell B. Chamlin;John K. Cochran

  • Social Support and Social Reform: A Progressive Crime Control Agenda

    Francis T. Cullen;John Paul Wright;Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • SOCIAL ALTRUISM AND CRIME

    Mitchell B. Chamlin;John K. Cochran

  • DETERRENCE OR BRUTALIZATION? AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF OKLAHOMA'S RETURN TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT*

    John K. Cochran;Mitchell B. Chamlin;Mark Seth

  • PROTESTANT FUNDAMENTALISM AND THE RETRIBUTIVE DOCTRINE OF PUNISHMENT

    Harold G. Grasmick;Elizabeth Davenport;Mitchell B. Chamlin;Robert J. Bursik

  • A Preliminary Examination of Ethnic Identification among Whites.

    Richard D. Alba;Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • Testing the Economic Production and Conflict Models of Crime Control

    Allen E. Liska;Mitchell B. Chamlin;Mark D. Reed

  • Racial Threat, Suspicion, and Police Behavior The Impact of Race and Place in Traffic Enforcement

    Kenneth J. Novak;Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • Shame, Embarrassment, and Formal Sanction Threats: Extending the Deterrence/Rational Choice Model to Academic Dishonesty

    John K. Cochran;Mitchell B. Chamlin;Peter B. Wood;Christine S. Sellers

  • A time-series analysis of the impact of heavy drinking on homicide and suicide mortality in Russia, 1956-2002.

    William Alex Pridemore;Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • The enduring racial divide in death penalty support

    John K. Cochran;Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • Economic Inequality, Legitimacy, and Cross-National Homicide Rates:

    Mitchell B. Chamlin;John K. Cochran

  • Individual and Contextual Effects on Stress and Job Satisfaction: A Study of Prison Staff.

    Judith R Blau;Stephen C Light;Mitchell B Chamlin

  • Conflict theory and police killings

    Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • Religion, Religiosity, and Nonmarital Sexual Conduct: An Application of Reference Group Theory

    John K. Cochran;Mitchell B. Chamlin;Leonard Beeghley;Melissa Fenwick

  • Can information change public opinion? Another test of the Marshall hypotheses

    John K. Cochran;Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • A Macro Social Analysis of Change in Police Force Size, 1972–1982: Controlling for Static and Dynamic Influences

    Mitchell B. Chamlin

  • An evaluation of the assumptions that underlie institutional anomie theory

    Mitchell B. Chamlin;John K. Cochran

Frequent Co-Authors

John K. Cochran
John K. Cochran University of South Florida
William Alex Pridemore
William Alex Pridemore University of Georgia
Harold G. Grasmick
Harold G. Grasmick University of Oklahoma
Christopher T. Lowenkamp
Christopher T. Lowenkamp University of Missouri–Kansas City
James Frank
James Frank University of Cincinnati
Francis T. Cullen
Francis T. Cullen University of Cincinnati
Lorraine Mazerolle
Lorraine Mazerolle University of Queensland
Richard B. Felson
Richard B. Felson Pennsylvania State University
John Paul Wright
John Paul Wright University of Cincinnati
Richard D. Alba
Richard D. Alba City University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to many online degree options and career paths. Students interested in counseling should consider exploring accredited cacrep schools, which provide essential training for future licensed counselors while keeping affordability in mind.

For those passionate about supporting families and relationships, an online mft degree is a pathway to becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist—a growing field that values strong communication and empathy skills.

Psychology remains a popular choice both for its career flexibility and foundational skills. Searching for a cheap psychology degree online makes it possible to pursue this path without high tuition costs, whether aiming for research, clinical roles, or further graduate studies.

Many are also drawn to social work, where accessible options such as the msw allow students to start making a difference in their communities sooner—for less. As online programs expand, exploring these options ensures your education is affordable, accredited, and aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mitchell B. Chamlin

Recently Published Articles