World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maximilian Röglinger

Maximilian Röglinger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 34 2332 2198 74 72 174 5582

Maximilian Röglinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maximilian Röglinger between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maximilian Röglinger published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 32 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 15 publications
2006 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maximilian Röglinger: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 3
2007 1
2008 1
2009 7
2010 3
2011 7
2012 12
2013 6
2014 5
2015 10
2016 8
2017 13
2018 14
2019 9
2020 15
2021 19
2022 17
2023 13
2024 17
2025 15
Total 195
Download as CSV

Maximilian Röglinger publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian Röglinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 170–174 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 174 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40 174
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Maximilian Röglinger D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian Röglinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135 34
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Maturity Models in Business Process Management

    Maximilian Röglinger;Jens Pöppelbuß;Jörg Becker

  • What makes a useful maturity model? : A framework for general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management

    Jens Pöppelbuß;Maximilian Röglinger

  • Understanding FinTech Start-Ups : A Taxonomy of Consumer-Oriented Service Offerings

    Henner Gimpel;Daniel Rau;Maximilian Röglinger

  • Digital Transformation : Changes and Chances – Insights based on an Empirical Study

    Henner Gimpel;Maximilian Röglinger

  • Big Data : A Fashionable Topic with(out) Sustainable Relevance for Research and Practice?

    Hans Ulrich Buhl;Maximilian Röglinger;Florian Moser;Julia Heidemann

  • How to Exploit the Digitalization Potential of Business Processes

    Marie-Sophie Denner;Louis Christian Püschel;Maximilian Röglinger

  • The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die

    Unknown

  • An Exploration into Future Business Process Management Capabilities in View of Digitalization : Results from a Delphi Study

    Georgi Dimov Kerpedzhiev;Ulrich Matthias König;Maximilian Röglinger;Michael Rosemann

  • An update for taxonomy designers: Methodological guidance from information systems research

    Dennis Kundisch;Jan Muntermann;Anna Maria Oberländer;Daniel Rau

  • Conceptualizing business-to-thing interactions – A sociomaterial perspective on the Internet of Things

    Anna Maria Oberländer;Maximilian Röglinger;Michael Rosemann;Alexandra Kees

  • Machine Learning in Business Process Monitoring: A Comparison of Deep Learning and Classical Approaches Used for Outcome Prediction

    Wolfgang Kratsch;Jonas Manderscheid;Maximilian Röglinger;Johannes Seyfried

  • Introduction to Digitalization Cases: How Organizations Rethink Their Business for the Digital Age

    Nils Urbach;Maximilian Röglinger

  • What does it Take to Implement Open Innovation? Towards an Integrated Capability Framework

    Sabiölla Hosseini;Alexandra Kees;Jonas Manderscheid;Maximilian Röglinger

  • Opportunities and Challenges for Process Mining in Organizations: Results of a Delphi Study

    Niels Martin;Niels Martin;Dominik Andreas Fischer;Georgi Dimov Kerpedzhiev;Kanika Goel

  • Value Orientation in Process Management : Research Gap and Contribution to Economically Well-Founded Decisions in Process Management

    Hans Ulrich Buhl;Maximilian Röglinger;Stefan Stöckl;Kathrin Susanne Braunwarth

  • Exogenous Shocks and Business Process Management

    Unknown

  • HOW TO IMPLEMENT AGILE IT SETUPS: A TAXONOMY OF DESIGN OPTIONS

    Jan Jöhnk;Maximilian Röglinger;Markus Thimmel;Nils Urbach

  • Quality-informed semi-automated event log generation for process mining

    Robert Andrews;Christopher G. J. van Dun;Moe Thandar Wynn;Wolfgang Kratsch

  • The Effects of Digital Technology on Opportunity Recognition

    Thomas Kreuzer;Anna Lindenthal;Anna Maria Oberländer;Maximilian Röglinger

  • Mindfully going omni-channel: An economic decision model for evaluating omni-channel strategies

    Sabiölla Hosseini;Marieluise Merz;Maximilian Röglinger;Annette Wenninger

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Rosemann
Michael Rosemann Queensland University of Technology
Nils Urbach
Nils Urbach Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences
Jörg Becker
Jörg Becker University of Münster
Jan vom Brocke
Jan vom Brocke University of Münster
Moe Thandar Wynn
Moe Thandar Wynn Queensland University of Technology
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jan Marco Leimeister
Jan Marco Leimeister University of Kassel
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede
Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede Queensland University of Technology
Carol Saunders
Carol Saunders University of Central Florida
Artem Polyvyanyy
Artem Polyvyanyy University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Maximilian Röglinger

Recently Published Articles