World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maj-Lis Smith

Maj-Lis Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
10928
World Ranking
6348
National Ranking
129

Maj-Lis Smith publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maj-Lis Smith sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Maj-Lis Smith D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maj-Lis Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maj-Lis Smith is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and conducts research primarily within the domain of Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work focuses particularly on the subfield of Animal Science and Zoology.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Livestock and Poultry Management
  • Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health

Smith has contributed to the academic literature with recent publications in recognized scientific venues. One of the recent papers authored includes:

  • Dietary Protein and Energy Levels at 3200 m Altitude for Slow-Growing Chickens, 2024, American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences

This particular article was published in the American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, which is among the venues where Smith has published their research.

Throughout their career, Maj-Lis Smith has collaborated with several co-authors, indicating a network of research partnerships. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mariela Ketty Meza-Morveli
  • Liz Beatriz Chino-Velasquez
  • Jesús Camero DeLaCuba
  • Oscar Gomez Quispe
  • Juan Elmer Moscoso-Muñoz

The scope of Smith's research encompasses animal nutrition and physiological responses under varied environmental conditions, with specific attention to livestock and poultry management practices. Their work on slow-growing chickens at high altitude levels adds to the understanding of animal dietary requirements in challenging ecological settings.

Best Publications

  • Models for studying long-term recovery following forebrain ischemia in the rat. 2. A 2-vessel occlusion model

    Maj‐Lis ‐L Smith;George Bendek;Nils Dahlgren;Ingmar Rosén

  • Differential regulation of mRNAs for nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and neurotrophin 3 in the adult rat brain following cerebral ischemia and hypoglycemic coma.

    Olle Lindvall;Patrik Ernfors;Johan Bengzon;Zaal Kokaia

  • Penumbral tissues salvaged by reperfusion following middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats.

    Hajime Memezawa;Maj Lis Smith;Bo K. Siesjo

  • The effect of mild hyperthermia and hypothermia on brain damage following 5, 10, and 15 minutes of forebrain ischemia.

    Hiroaki Minamisawa;Maj-Lis Smith;Bo K. Siesjö

  • The influence of mild body and brain hypothermia on ischemic brain damage.

    Hiroaki Minamisawa;Carl-Henrik Nordström;Maj-Lis Smith;Bo K. Siesjö

  • Ischemic penumbra in a model of reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat.

    H Memezawa;H Minamisawa;M L Smith;B K Siesjö

  • Changes in Extra- and Intracellular pH in the Brain during and following Ischemia in Hyperglycemic and in Moderately Hypoglycemic Rats

    M. L. Smith;R. von Hanwehr;B. K. Siesjö

  • Increased production of the TrkB protein tyrosine kinase receptor after brain insults

    Jean-Philippe Merlio;Patrik Ernfors;Zaal Kokaia;David S. Middlemas

  • Regulation of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Expression after Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion with and without Brain Damage

    Zaal Kokaia;Qi Zhao;Merab Kokaia;Eskil Elmér

  • Delayed treatment with the spin trap α-phenyl-N-tert-butyl nitrone (PBN) reduces infarct size following transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats

    Q. Zhao;K. Pahlmark;M.-L. Smith;B. K. Siesjö

  • Neuroprotective effects of a novel nitrone, NXY-059, after transient focal cerebral ischemia in the rat.

    Satoshi Kuroda;Ryoichi Tsuchidate;Maj-Lis Smith;Kirk R. Maples

  • Mechanisms of secondary brain damage in global and focal ischemia: a speculative synthesis

    Bo K. Siesjö;Ken-Ichiro Katsura;Qi Zhao;Jaroslava Folbergrová

  • Local Cerebral Blood Flow in the Recovery Period following Complete Cerebral Ischemia in the Rat

    Erik Kågström;Maj-Lis Smith;Bo K. Siesjö

  • Hyperthermia complicates middle cerebral artery occlusion induced by an intraluminal filament.

    Qi Zhao;H. Memezawa;M.-L. Smith;B. K. Siesjö

  • Amelioration by cyclosporin A of brain damage in transient forebrain ischemia in the rat

    Hiroyuki Uchino;Eskil Elmér;Keiko Uchino;Ping-An Li

  • Recirculation in the Rat Brain following Incomplete Ischemia

    Erik Kågström;Maj-Lis Smith;Bo K. Siesjö

  • Focal and Perifocal Changes in Tissue Energy State during Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Normo- and Hyperglycemic Rats

    Jaroslava Folbergrová;Hajime Memezawa;Maj-Lis Smith;Bo K. Siesjö

  • Extra- and intracellular pH during near-complete forebrain ischemia in the rat.

    Roger von Hanwehr;Maj‐Lis Smith;Bo K. Siesjö

  • Lactic Acidosis and Recovery of Mitochondrial Function following Forebrain Ischemia in the Rat

    Lars Hillered;Maj-Lis Smith;Bo K. Siesjö

  • Regional brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA and protein levels following transient forebrain ischemia in the rat

    Zaal Kokaia;H Nawa;H Uchino;Eskil Elmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Bo K. Siesjö
Bo K. Siesjö Lund University
Zaal Kokaia
Zaal Kokaia Lund University
Olle Lindvall
Olle Lindvall Lund University
Ingmar Rosén
Ingmar Rosén Lund University
Merab Kokaia
Merab Kokaia Lund University
Eskil Elmér
Eskil Elmér Lund University
Johan Bengzon
Johan Bengzon Lund University
Tadeusz Wieloch
Tadeusz Wieloch Lund University
Wolfgang Kuschinsky
Wolfgang Kuschinsky Heidelberg University
Håkan Persson
Håkan Persson Läkemedelsverket

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open new doors for neuroscience students who want flexibility and affordability. Many professionals begin their journey with online certificates—quick, practical programs that can significantly boost your resume and pay potential in healthcare and research roles.

If you're looking for accessible options, there are easy degrees to get online that focus on multidisciplinary sciences, psychology, or health studies. These choices can serve as stepping stones into specialized neuroscience careers or graduate programs.

For those interested in counseling or mental health services, pursuing cheap online msw programs allows you to combine neuroscience insights with social work practice—often at a fraction of traditional tuition costs.

Interested in applied behavioral analysis? Accredited bcba online masters programs are a cost-effective way to advance into clinical or research roles, blending neuroscience with in-demand mental health expertise.

Combining online study with neuroscience interests can unlock unique career pathways without the constraints of campus-based learning.

Best Scientists Citing Maj-Lis Smith

Recently Published Articles