World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lorenzo Leonetti

Lorenzo Leonetti

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
31
Citations
1946
World Ranking
3361
National Ranking
132

Lorenzo Leonetti publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenzo Leonetti sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 78 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Lorenzo Leonetti D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenzo Leonetti sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A cohesive fracture model for predicting crack spacing and crack width in reinforced concrete structures

    Unknown

  • Mechanical behavior of bio-inspired nacre-like composites: A hybrid multiscale modeling approach

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Andrea Pranno;Andrea Pranno;Stephan Rudykh

  • A multiscale damage analysis of periodic composites using a couple-stress/Cauchy multidomain model: Application to masonry structures

    Lorenzo Leonetti;Fabrizio Greco;Patrizia Trovalusci;Raimondo Luciano

  • A two-scale failure analysis of composite materials in presence of fiber/matrix crack initiation and propagation

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Paolo Lonetti

  • A study of concrete cover separation failure in FRP-plated RC beams via an inter-element fracture approach

    Umberto De Maio;Francesco Fabbrocino;Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti

  • A refined diffuse cohesive approach for the failure analysis in quasibrittle materials—part I: Theoretical formulation and numerical calibration

    Umberto De Maio;Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Raimondo Luciano

  • Failure Analysis of Ultra High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Structures Enhanced with Nanomaterials by Using a Diffuse Cohesive Interface Approach

    Umberto De Maio;Nicholas Fantuzzi;Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti

  • An investigation about debonding mechanisms in FRP-strengthened RC structural elements by using a cohesive/volumetric modeling technique

    Umberto De Maio;Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Paolo Nevone Blasi

  • Multiscale failure analysis of periodic masonry structures with traditional and fiber-reinforced mortar joints

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Raimondo Luciano;Patrizia Trovalusci

  • A refined diffuse cohesive approach for the failure analysis in quasibrittle materials—part II: Application to plain and reinforced concrete structures

    Umberto De Maio;Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Raimondo Luciano

  • A multiscale model for the numerical simulation of the anchor bolt pull-out test in lightweight aggregate concrete.

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Raimondo Luciano

  • A MULTISCALE/MULTIDOMAIN MODEL FOR THE FAILURE ANALYSIS OF MASONRY WALLS: A VALIDATION WITH A COMBINED FEM/DEM APPROACH

    Unknown

  • An interface-based detailed micro-model for the failure simulation of masonry structures

    Unknown

  • Non-linear macroscopic response of fiber-reinforced composite materials due to initiation and propagation of interface cracks

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Paolo Nevone Blasi

  • Crack propagation analysis in composite materials by using moving mesh and multiscale techniques

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Paolo Lonetti;Paolo Nevone Blasi

  • A multiscale analysis of instability-induced failure mechanisms in fiber-reinforced composite structures via alternative modeling approaches

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Paolo Lonetti;Raimondo Luciano

  • Investigation of mesh dependency issues in the simulation of crack propagation in quasi‐brittle materials by using a diffuse interface modeling approach

    Unknown

  • An adaptive multiscale strategy for the damage analysis of masonry modeled as a composite material

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Raimondo Luciano;Paolo Nevone Blasi

  • Adaptive multiscale modeling of fiber-reinforced composite materials subjected to transverse microcracking

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Paolo Nevone Blasi

  • A novel approach based on ALE and delamination fracture mechanics for multilayered composite beams

    Fabrizio Greco;Lorenzo Leonetti;Paolo Lonetti

Frequent Co-Authors

Fabrizio Greco
Fabrizio Greco University of Calabria
Paolo Lonetti
Paolo Lonetti University of Calabria
Raimondo Luciano
Raimondo Luciano Parthenope University of Naples
Stephan Rudykh
Stephan Rudykh University of Wisconsin–Madison
Nicholas Fantuzzi
Nicholas Fantuzzi University of Bologna
Sabrina Vantadori
Sabrina Vantadori University of Parma
Francesco Tornabene
Francesco Tornabene University of Salento
Francesco Fabbrocino
Francesco Fabbrocino Pegaso University
Luciano Feo
Luciano Feo University of Salerno

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. Understanding the online speech pathology degree programs cost is essential for those considering interdisciplinary fields or dual degrees to enhance their skill set and employability.

Veterans interested in advancing their education will find tailored options such as speech pathology degree online for veterans, which highlight specialized support and benefits. Similarly, accelerated programs offer the chance to fast-track education and enter the workforce sooner, as seen in accelerated speech pathology programs.

Moreover, interdisciplinary career paths like becoming an FBI profiler combine analytical and technical skills that students from engineering backgrounds can leverage. Exploring such pathways broadens professional horizons and underscores the value of complementary knowledge beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Lorenzo Leonetti

Recently Published Articles