World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
10865
World Ranking
9530
National Ranking
4040

John Zahorjan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Zahorjan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 79 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John Zahorjan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Zahorjan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Zahorjan is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their academic profile includes a focus on various aspects of computer science and engineering, although specific fields and topics of study have not been detailed in the available data.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or known publication venues tied to their profile in the present dataset. Additionally, no book publications or awards have been noted.

Despite the limited data on research outputs, such as publications or collaborations, their association with the University of Washington indicates involvement in academic research within a major research institution in the United States.

Best Publications

  • The challenges of mobile computing

    George H. Forman;John Zahorjan

  • Adaptive load sharing in homogeneous distributed systems

    D. L. Eager;E. D. Lazowska;J. Zahorjan

  • Measurement, modeling, and analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload

    Krishna P. Gummadi;Richard J. Dunn;Stefan Saroiu;Steven D. Gribble

  • Detour: informed Internet routing and transport

    S. Savage;T. Anderson;A. Aggarwal;D. Becker

  • Measurement-based models of delivery and interference in static wireless networks

    Charles Reis;Ratul Mahajan;Maya Rodrig;David Wetherall

  • A dynamic processor allocation policy for multiprogrammed shared-memory multiprocessors

    Cathy McCann;Raj Vaswani;John Zahorjan

  • Interactive wifi connectivity for moving vehicles

    Aruna Balasubramanian;Ratul Mahajan;Arun Venkataramani;Brian Neil Levine

  • Optimal and efficient merging schedules for video-on-demand servers

    Derek Eager;Mary Vernon;John Zahorjan

  • The limited performance benefits of migrating active processes for load sharing

    D. L. Eager;E. D. Lazowska;J. Zahorjan

  • Analyzing the MAC-level behavior of wireless networks in the wild

    Ratul Mahajan;Maya Rodrig;David Wetherall;John Zahorjan

  • Measurement-based characterization of 802.11 in a hotspot setting

    Maya Rodrig;Charles Reis;Ratul Mahajan;David Wetherall

  • Bandwidth Skimming: A Technique for Cost-Effective Video-on-Demand *

    Derek L. Eager;Mary K. Vernon;John Zahorjan

  • Processor scheduling in shared memory multiprocessors

    John Zahorjan;Cathy McCann

  • File access performance of diskless workstations

    Edward D. Lazowska;John Zahorjan;David R. Cheriton;Willy Zwaenepoel

  • Balanced job bound analysis of queueing networks

    John Zahorjan;Kenneth C. Sevcik;Derek L. Eager;Bruce Galler

  • Sustaining cooperation in multi-hop wireless networks

    Ratul Mahajan;Maya Rodrig;David Wetherall;John Zahorjan

  • Modeling and analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload

    Krishna Phani Gummadi;Richard J. Dunn;Stefan Saroiu;Steven Gribble

  • The implications of cache affinity on processor scheduling for multiprogrammed, shared memory multiprocessors

    Raj Vaswani;John Zahorjan

  • Detour: a Case for Informed Internet Routing and Transport

    Stefan Savage;Tom Anderson;Amit Aggarwal;David Becker

  • Understanding wifi-based connectivity from moving vehicles

    Ratul Mahajan;John Zahorjan;Brian Zill

  • A comparison of receiver-initiated and Sendes-initiated adaptive load sharing

    D. L. Eager;E. D. Lazowska;J. Zahorjan

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward D. Lazowska
Edward D. Lazowska University of Washington
Ratul Mahajan
Ratul Mahajan University of Washington
David Wetherall
David Wetherall Google (United States)
Derek L. Eager
Derek L. Eager University of Saskatchewan
David Notkin
David Notkin University of Washington
Henry M. Levy
Henry M. Levy University of Washington
Thomas Anderson
Thomas Anderson University of Washington
Thu D. Nguyen
Thu D. Nguyen Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Steven D. Gribble
Steven D. Gribble Google (United States)
Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways. Students interested in expanding their technical expertise may consider programs such as an online degree for mechanical engineering, which blends problem-solving skills with applied technology for roles in various engineering sectors.

For those fascinated by the principles underlying computer science, pursuing online physics degrees can be another pathway. These programs develop critical analytical skills and a strong foundation in scientific computing, applicable in both academic and industry environments.

The demand for skilled data professionals continues to grow. Enrolling in data science programs can lead to careers in analytics, machine learning, and big data management—fields highly sought after by today’s employers.

Lastly, an education in computer science often overlaps with electrical and electronics engineering. Discovering online electrical engineering career outcomes can help students understand the job opportunities available, from systems development to telecommunications.

Best Scientists Citing John Zahorjan

Recently Published Articles