What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Quantum mechanics
- Particle physics
- Nuclear physics
Nuclear physics, Particle physics, Large Hadron Collider, Hadron and Charged particle are his primary areas of study.
Joakim Nystrand studied Nuclear physics and Spectral line that intersect with Jet quenching.
The concepts of his Particle physics study are interwoven with issues in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and Centrality.
His work carried out in the field of Large Hadron Collider brings together such families of science as Impact parameter, Particle identification, Quantum chromodynamics, HERA and Proton.
His studies in Hadron integrate themes in fields like Particle, Meson, Elementary particle, Atomic physics and Elliptic flow.
His work in Charged particle addresses issues such as Time projection chamber, which are connected to fields such as STAR detector.
His most cited work include:
- Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus–nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX Collaboration (2002 citations)
- The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC (1000 citations)
- Suppression of hadrons with large transverse momentum in central Au + Au collisions at √sNN = 130 GeV (676 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Nuclear physics, Particle physics, Large Hadron Collider, Hadron and Rapidity.
His study in Charged particle extends to Nuclear physics with its themes.
His Particle physics study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Photon.
The Large Hadron Collider study combines topics in areas such as Range, Proton and Detector, Particle identification.
In Hadron, Joakim Nystrand works on issues like Quark, which are connected to Charm.
Joakim Nystrand has researched Rapidity in several fields, including Centrality, Parton, Impact parameter, Quarkonium and Muon.
He most often published in these fields:
- Nuclear physics (78.34%)
- Particle physics (55.96%)
- Large Hadron Collider (43.02%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Large Hadron Collider (43.02%)
- Nuclear physics (78.34%)
- Particle physics (55.96%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Joakim Nystrand spends much of his time researching Large Hadron Collider, Nuclear physics, Particle physics, Hadron and Rapidity.
Joakim Nystrand has included themes like Multiplicity, Meson and Spectral line in his Large Hadron Collider study.
His Nuclear physics research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Quantum chromodynamics and Charged particle.
His research links Lambda with Particle physics.
In his work, Charm is strongly intertwined with Quark, which is a subfield of Hadron.
His Rapidity research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Centrality, Momentum, Quarkonium and Muon.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Multiplicity dependence of light-flavor hadron production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV (64 citations)
- Centrality and pseudorapidity dependence of the charged-particle multiplicity density in Xe–Xe collisions at √sNN=5.44TeV (51 citations)
- Transverse momentum spectra and nuclear modification factors of charged particles in Xe–Xe collisions at sNN=5.44TeV (42 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Quantum mechanics
- Electron
- Particle physics
His scientific interests lie mostly in Nuclear physics, Large Hadron Collider, Quark–gluon plasma, Hadron and Meson.
His Nuclear physics research includes elements of Spectral line and Quantum chromodynamics.
His Large Hadron Collider research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Lambda, Scattering length and Nucleon.
In his research, Anisotropy and Electron is intimately related to Charged particle, which falls under the overarching field of Quark–gluon plasma.
His study with Meson involves better knowledge in Particle physics.
His Particle physics research integrates issues from Energy and Centrality.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
