World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
43
Citations
7205
World Ranking
4455
National Ranking
121

Jan M. Hoem publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan M. Hoem sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jan M. Hoem D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan M. Hoem sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan M. Hoem was a researcher affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany whose work primarily focused on social sciences, with a particular emphasis on gender studies and demography. Their research contributions addressed demographic trends, family dynamics, and gender preferences, situating their scholarship within broader social and educational sciences contexts.

They published several papers in the OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) repository at La Trobe University, which served as a frequent venue for their work. Notable publications included:

  • The impact of the first child on family stability, 2021, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • The Role of ConsensualUnions in Romanian TotalFertility, 2021, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Marriages connected with first births among cohabiting women in the Danish fertility survey of 1975, 2021, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Jan M. Hoem's work engaged with a range of subfields including gender studies, pediatrics and perinatology, political science, and education. Their scholarly topics centered on:

  • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social and Educational Sciences
  • Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management

Their collaborations extended to several frequent coauthors, notably:

  • Cornelia Mureşan
  • Britta Hoem
  • Per Båvner

This collective research contributed to advancing knowledge related to fertility patterns, union formation, and the social implications of family structure changes in contemporary populations. Jan M. Hoem's publications often explored the interplay between fertility decisions and social stability within families.

Best Publications

  • Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course

    Andres Vikat;Zsolt Spéder;Gijs Beets;Francesco C. Billari

  • Education and childlessness: The relationship between educational field, educational level, and childlessness among Swedish women born in 1955-59

    Jan M. Hoem;Gerda Neyer;Gunnar Andersson

  • Public Policy as the Fuel of Fertility: Effects of a Policy Reform on the Pace of Childbearing in Sweden in the 1980s:

    Jan M. Hoem

  • The Impact of Women's Employment on Second and Third Births in Modern Sweden

    Britta Hoem;Jan M. Hoem

  • Social policy and recent fertility change in Sweden.

    Jan M. Hoem

  • Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden.

    Elizabeth Thomson;Jan M. Hoem

  • The impact of education on modern family-union initiation

    Jan M. Hoem

  • Markov Chain Models in Life Insurance

    Jan M. Hoem

  • Autonomy or Conservative Adjustment?:The Effect of Public Policies and EducationalAttainment on Third Births in Austria, 1975-96

    Jan M. Hoem;Alexia Prskawetz;Gerda R. Neyer

  • Educational Gradients in Divorce Risks in Sweden in Recent Decades

    Jan M. Hoem

  • Statistical analysis of a multiplicative model and its application to the standardization of vital rates

    Hoem Jm;Ahlbom A

  • Overview Chapter 8: The impact of public policies on European fertility

    Jan M. Hoem

  • Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research: Part 1: Education and first childbearing

    Jan M. Hoem;Michaela R. Kreyenfeld

  • Traces of the Second Demographic Transition in Four Selected Countries in Central and Eastern Europe: Union Formation as a Demographic Manifestation

    Jan M. Hoem;Dora Kostova;Aiva Jasilioniene;Cornelia Mureşan

  • Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union

    Andres Vikat;Elizabeth Thomson;Jan M. Hoem

  • Educational attainment and ultimate fertility among Swedish women born in 1955-59

    Jan M. Hoem;Gerda R. Neyer;Gunnar Andersson

  • Sweden's family policies and roller-coaster fertility.

    Britta Hoem;Jan M. Hoem

  • Social differentials in speed-premium effects in childbearing in Sweden

    Gunnar Andersson;Jan M. Hoem;Ann-Zofie Duvander

  • Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research. Part 1: the role of education in the study of first childbearing.

    Hoem Jm;Kreyenfeld M

  • Experiments in modelling recent Danish fertility curves

    Jan M. Hoem;Dan Madsen;Jørgen Løvgreen Nielsen;Else-Marie Ohlsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Gunnar Andersson
Gunnar Andersson Stockholm University
Michaela Kreyenfeld
Michaela Kreyenfeld Hertie School
Elizabeth Thomson
Elizabeth Thomson Stockholm University
Ørnulf Borgan
Ørnulf Borgan University of Oslo
Hans-Peter Blossfeld
Hans-Peter Blossfeld University of Bamberg
Francesco C. Billari
Francesco C. Billari Bocconi University
Karsten Hank
Karsten Hank University of Cologne
Arnstein Aassve
Arnstein Aassve Bocconi University
Hans-Peter Kohler
Hans-Peter Kohler University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in flexible options for advancing your education in Social Sciences and Humanities, online study can provide valuable pathways. An increasing number of accredited institutions now offer one year online masters programs, making it possible to gain advanced credentials and relevant skills in less time than traditional on-campus degrees.

For adult learners looking to complete their undergraduate training efficiently, many colleges offer accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults. These programs are designed to accommodate busy schedules, often letting students apply transfer credits and finish sooner.

For those pursuing a social work career, affordability matters. There are now numerous affordable online msw programs that focus on providing access to high-quality training without overwhelming tuition costs.

Additionally, if your goal is a specialized career in behavior analysis, consider exploring bcba master's programs online. These programs can prepare you for Board Certified Behavior Analyst certification and for new roles in education, counseling, or healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Jan M. Hoem

Recently Published Articles