| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 43 | 4455 | 121 | 126 | 7205 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Jan M. Hoem between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan M. Hoem published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2006. 2 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.
132 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1968 | 1 |
| 1969 | 4 |
| 1970 | 1 |
| 1971 | 5 |
| 1972 | 2 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1 |
| 1976 | 2 |
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 3 |
| 1979 | 2 |
| 1980 | 4 |
| 1981 | 1 |
| 1982 | 3 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 3 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 3 |
| 1988 | 4 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 3 |
| 1991 | 2 |
| 1992 | 2 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 3 |
| 1997 | 1 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 6 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 4 |
| 2002 | 2 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2006 | 8 |
| 2007 | 8 |
| 2008 | 7 |
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 3 |
| 2011 | 6 |
| 2012 | 1 |
| 2013 | 4 |
| 2014 | 3 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 1 |
| 2017 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 4 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 2 |
| Total | 132 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan M. Hoem sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile
28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 44–53 | 28 | |
| 54–63 | 61 | |
| 64–73 | 161 | |
| 74–83 | 225 | |
| 84–93 | 301 | |
| 94–103 | 390 | |
| 104–113 | 406 | |
| 114–123 | 474 | |
| 124–133 | 453 | 126 |
| 134–143 | 434 | |
| 144–153 | 407 | |
| 154–163 | 411 | |
| 164–173 | 391 | |
| 174–183 | 313 | |
| 184–193 | 319 | |
| 194–203 | 304 | |
| 204–213 | 285 | |
| 214–223 | 246 | |
| 224–233 | 213 | |
| 234–243 | 170 | |
| 244–253 | 167 | |
| 254–263 | 162 | |
| 264–273 | 138 | |
| 274–283 | 138 | |
| 284–293 | 113 | |
| 294–303 | 106 | |
| 304–313 | 95 | |
| 314–323 | 101 | |
| 324–333 | 81 | |
| 334–343 | 69 | |
| 344–353 | 56 | |
| 354–363 | 36 | |
| 364–373 | 42 | |
| 374–383 | 41 | |
| 384–393 | 44 | |
| 394–403 | 27 | |
| 404–413 | 30 | |
| 414–423 | 20 | |
| 424–433 | 29 | |
| 434–443 | 29 | |
| 444–453 | 25 | |
| 454–463 | 19 | |
| 464–473 | 21 | |
| 474–483 | 11 | |
| 484–493 | 17 | |
| 494–503 | 7 | |
| 504–513 | 6 | |
| 514–523 | 12 | |
| 524–533 | 10 | |
| 534–543 | 7 | |
| 544–553 | 6 | |
| 554–563 | 12 | |
| 564–569 | 8 | |
| 570+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan M. Hoem sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile
46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 177 | |
| 31 | 210 | |
| 32 | 222 | |
| 33 | 188 | |
| 34 | 181 | |
| 35 | 243 | |
| 36 | 261 | |
| 37 | 272 | |
| 38 | 278 | |
| 39 | 300 | |
| 40 | 297 | |
| 41 | 308 | |
| 42 | 313 | |
| 43 | 300 | 43 |
| 44 | 269 | |
| 45 | 260 | |
| 46 | 228 | |
| 47 | 251 | |
| 48 | 203 | |
| 49 | 186 | |
| 50 | 187 | |
| 51 | 166 | |
| 52 | 138 | |
| 53 | 141 | |
| 54 | 131 | |
| 55 | 137 | |
| 56 | 109 | |
| 57 | 129 | |
| 58 | 95 | |
| 59 | 105 | |
| 60 | 106 | |
| 61 | 86 | |
| 62 | 94 | |
| 63 | 77 | |
| 64 | 79 | |
| 65 | 59 | |
| 66 | 68 | |
| 67 | 51 | |
| 68 | 49 | |
| 69 | 40 | |
| 70 | 43 | |
| 71 | 40 | |
| 72 | 50 | |
| 73 | 46 | |
| 74 | 43 | |
| 75 | 45 | |
| 76 | 45 | |
| 77 | 30 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 31 | |
| 80 | 29 | |
| 81 | 18 | |
| 82 | 21 | |
| 83 | 26 | |
| 84 | 15 | |
| 85 | 15 | |
| 86 | 19 | |
| 87 | 19 | |
| 88 | 12 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 19 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 13 | |
| 93 | 9 | |
| 94 | 13 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 7 | |
| 97 | 6 | |
| 98 | 6 | |
| 99 | 6 | |
| 100+ | 97 |
Jan M. Hoem was a researcher affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany whose work primarily focused on social sciences, with a particular emphasis on gender studies and demography. Their research contributions addressed demographic trends, family dynamics, and gender preferences, situating their scholarship within broader social and educational sciences contexts.
They published several papers in the OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) repository at La Trobe University, which served as a frequent venue for their work. Notable publications included:
Jan M. Hoem's work engaged with a range of subfields including gender studies, pediatrics and perinatology, political science, and education. Their scholarly topics centered on:
Their collaborations extended to several frequent coauthors, notably:
This collective research contributed to advancing knowledge related to fertility patterns, union formation, and the social implications of family structure changes in contemporary populations. Jan M. Hoem's publications often explored the interplay between fertility decisions and social stability within families.
Andres Vikat;Zsolt Spéder;Gijs Beets;Francesco C. Billari
Jan M. Hoem;Gerda Neyer;Gunnar Andersson
Jan M. Hoem
Britta Hoem;Jan M. Hoem
Jan M. Hoem
Elizabeth Thomson;Jan M. Hoem
Jan M. Hoem
Jan M. Hoem
Jan M. Hoem;Alexia Prskawetz;Gerda R. Neyer
Jan M. Hoem
Hoem Jm;Ahlbom A
Jan M. Hoem
Jan M. Hoem;Michaela R. Kreyenfeld
Jan M. Hoem;Dora Kostova;Aiva Jasilioniene;Cornelia Mureşan
Andres Vikat;Elizabeth Thomson;Jan M. Hoem
Jan M. Hoem;Gerda R. Neyer;Gunnar Andersson
Britta Hoem;Jan M. Hoem
Gunnar Andersson;Jan M. Hoem;Ann-Zofie Duvander
Hoem Jm;Kreyenfeld M
Jan M. Hoem;Dan Madsen;Jørgen Løvgreen Nielsen;Else-Marie Ohlsen
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
If you're interested in flexible options for advancing your education in Social Sciences and Humanities, online study can provide valuable pathways. An increasing number of accredited institutions now offer one year online masters programs, making it possible to gain advanced credentials and relevant skills in less time than traditional on-campus degrees.
For adult learners looking to complete their undergraduate training efficiently, many colleges offer accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults. These programs are designed to accommodate busy schedules, often letting students apply transfer credits and finish sooner.
For those pursuing a social work career, affordability matters. There are now numerous affordable online msw programs that focus on providing access to high-quality training without overwhelming tuition costs.
Additionally, if your goal is a specialized career in behavior analysis, consider exploring bcba master's programs online. These programs can prepare you for Board Certified Behavior Analyst certification and for new roles in education, counseling, or healthcare settings.
