World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
39
Citations
10833
World Ranking
2088
National Ranking
152

Filomeno Martina publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filomeno Martina sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 71 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Filomeno Martina D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filomeno Martina sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints

    Mary Kathryn Thompson;Giovanni Moroni;Tom Vaneker;Georges Fadel

  • Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing

    Stewart W. Williams;Filomeno Martina;Adrian C. Addison;Jialuo Ding

  • Investigation of the benefits of plasma deposition for the additive layer manufacture of Ti–6Al–4V

    Filomeno Martina;Jorn Mehnen;Stewart W. Williams;Paul A. Colegrove

  • Metal additive manufacturing in the commercial aviation industry: A review

    Annamaria Gisario;Michele Kazarian;Filomeno Martina;Mehrshad Mehrpouya

  • Microstructure and residual stress improvement in wire and arc additively manufactured parts through high-pressure rolling

    Paul Colegrove;Harry Edward Coules;Julian Fairman;Filomino Martina

  • A comparative study of additive manufacturing techniques: Residual stress and microstructural analysis of CLAD and WAAM printed Ti–6Al–4V components

    Blanka A. Szost;Sofiane Terzi;Filomeno Martina;Didier Boisselier

  • The effectiveness of combining rolling deformation with Wire–Arc Additive Manufacture on β-grain refinement and texture modification in Ti–6Al–4V

    Jack Donoghue;Alphons Anandaraj Antonysamy;F. Martina;P.A. Colegrove

  • Microstructure of Interpass Rolled Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V Components

    Filomeno Martina;Paul A. Colegrove;Stewart W. Williams;Jonathan Meyer

  • On the origin of microstructural banding in Ti-6Al4V wire-arc based high deposition rate additive manufacturing

    Alistair Ho;Hao Zhao;Jon W. Fellowes;Filomeno Martina

  • Application of bulk deformation methods for microstructural and material property improvement and residual stress and distortion control in additively manufactured components

    Paul A. Colegrove;Jack Donoghue;Filomeno Martina;Jianglong Gu

  • Residual stress of as-deposited and rolled wire+arc additive manufacturing Ti–6Al–4V components

    Filomeno Martina;M. J. Roy;B. A. Szost;S. Terzi

  • Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of maraging steel produced by wire + arc additive manufacture process

    Xiangfang Xu;Supriyo Ganguly;Jialuo Ding;Shun Guo

  • Tandem metal inert gas process for high productivity wire arc additive manufacturing in stainless steel

    Filomeno Martina;Jialuo Ding;Stewart W. Williams;Armando Caballero

  • Designing a WAAM based manufacturing system for defence applications

    Alessandro Busachi;John A. Erkoyuncu;Paul A. Colegrove;Filomeno Martina

  • A review of Additive Manufacturing technology and Cost Estimation techniques for the defence sector

    Alessandro Busachi;John Erkoyuncu;Paul A. Colegrove;Filomeno Martina

  • A modular path planning solution for Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing

    Florent Michel;Helen L. Lockett;Jialuo Ding;Filomeno Martina

  • Design for Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture: design rules and build orientation selection

    Helen L. Lockett;Jialuo Ding;Stewart W. Williams;Filomeno Martina

  • Fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate properties in wire + arc additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V

    Xiang Zhang;Xiang Zhang;Filomeno Martina;Jialuo Ding;X. Wang;X. Wang

  • Development of a laminar flow local shielding device for wire + arc additive manufacture

    J. Ding;P. Colegrove;F. Martina;S. Williams

  • Analysis of fracture toughness properties of wire + arc additive manufactured high strength low alloy structural steel components

    Philip Dirisu;Supriyo Ganguly;Ali Mehmanparast;Filomeno Martina

Frequent Co-Authors

Stewart W. Williams
Stewart W. Williams Cranfield University
Paul A. Colegrove
Paul A. Colegrove Cranfield University
Jialuo Ding
Jialuo Ding Cranfield University
Philip B. Prangnell
Philip B. Prangnell University of Manchester
Xiang Zhang
Xiang Zhang University of Hong Kong
Philip J. Withers
Philip J. Withers University of Manchester
Adam T. Clare
Adam T. Clare University of Nottingham
Ian Gibson
Ian Gibson University of Twente
Rajkumar Roy
Rajkumar Roy City, University of London
Armando Caballero
Armando Caballero Universidade de Vigo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, understanding related fields can open up diverse career pathways. Some may consider interdisciplinary approaches, such as combining engineering with behavioral sciences or healthcare technology. For example, the accelerated ABA program offers a fast-track in applied behavior analysis, which can complement work in human factors engineering and ergonomics within aerospace environments.

Moreover, there is growing demand for professionals with skills in communication disorders affecting pilots and crew members. Hence, knowledge of speech language pathology graduate programs can provide unique expertise relevant to this niche.

For those interested in pursuing these paths, finding easiest SLP programs to get into could be a strategic way to get started. These options allow for a smoother transition and quicker entry into specialized roles alongside engineering careers.

Cost considerations are always important when choosing an additional degree. Reviewing online speech pathology degree costs and fees helps plan finances effectively while expanding your qualifications for versatile career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Filomeno Martina