World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Filippo Coletti

Filippo Coletti

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 30 3440 3234 1149 1021 156 2575

Filippo Coletti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Filippo Coletti between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Filippo Coletti published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2019. 16 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2019. 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
2008 2026

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Filippo Coletti: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 4
2009 1
2010 4
2011 9
2012 7
2013 15
2014 8
2015 8
2016 11
2017 17
2018 12
2019 25
2020 22
2021 4
2022 7
2023 9
2024 17
2025 15
2026 1
Total 196
Download as CSV

Filippo Coletti publications per year - data summary

  • Filippo Coletti, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from University of Minnesota, has 196 publications recorded across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2008 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2009 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 10.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.3 per year counting only the 19 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 49 publications, 25% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2008-2014: 48 publications (6.9 per year); 2015-2021: 99 publications (14.1 per year); 2022-2026: 49 publications (9.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Filippo Coletti publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filippo Coletti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–156 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 156 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155 156
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Filippo Coletti publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,445 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 63 ranges running from 47–56 to 659+ publications.
  • Filippo Coletti, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from University of Minnesota, records 156 publications - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists score the same or lower than Filippo Coletti, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 217–226 publications range, and Filippo Coletti ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 147–156 publications, holding 155 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 46% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 197–206 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 659 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Filippo Coletti D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filippo Coletti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83 30
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Filippo Coletti D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,445 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 64 ranges running from 30 to 93+ D-Index.
  • Filippo Coletti, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from University of Minnesota, records 30 D-Index - the 2nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 2% of ranked Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists score the same or lower than Filippo Coletti, and about 98% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 43 D-Index range, and Filippo Coletti ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 34 D-Index, holding 189 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 45 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Best Publications

  • Particle-Laden Turbulence: Progress and Perspectives

    Luca Brandt;Luca Brandt;Filippo Coletti

  • Turbulent transport in an inclined jet in crossflow

    F. Coletti;M.J. Benson;C.J. Elkins

  • Volumetric velocimetry for fluid flows

    Unknown

  • Three‑dimensional inspiratory flow in the upper and central human airways

    A. J. Banko;Filippo Coletti;D. Schiavazzi;C. J. Elkins

  • Flow field investigation in rotating rib-roughened channel by means of particle image velocimetry

    Filippo Coletti;Filippo Coletti;Thomas Maurer;Thomas Maurer;Tony Arts;Alberto Di Sante;Alberto Di Sante

  • Three-dimensional flow field around and downstream of a subscale model rotating vertical axis wind turbine

    Kevin J. Ryan;Filippo Coletti;Christopher J. Elkins;John O. Dabiri

  • Snowflakes in the atmospheric surface layer: observation of particle-turbulence dynamics

    Andras Nemes;Teja Dasari;Jiarong Hong;Michele Guala

  • Dynamics of small heavy particles in homogeneous turbulence: a Lagrangian experimental study

    Unknown

  • Turbulent flow in rib-roughened channel under the effect of Coriolis and rotational buoyancy forces

    Filippo Coletti;David Lo Jacono;Irene Cresci;Irene Cresci;Tony Arts

  • Radiation induces turbulence in particle-laden fluids

    Rémi Zamansky;Filippo Coletti;Marc Massot;Ali Mani;Ali Mani

  • Settling of heated particles in homogeneous turbulence

    Ari Frankel;Hadi Pouransari;Filippo Coletti;Ali Mani

  • Optimization of a U-Bend for Minimal Pressure Loss in Internal Cooling Channels: Part I—Numerical Method

    Tom Verstraete;Filippo Coletti;Je´re´my Bulle;Timothe´e Vanderwielen

  • The spatial structure of the logarithmic region in very-high-Reynolds-number rough wall turbulent boundary layers

    Michael Heisel;Teja Dasari;Yun Liu;Jiarong Hong

  • A matching pursuit approach to solenoidal filtering of three-dimensional velocity measurements

    Daniele Schiavazzi;Filippo Coletti;Gianluca Iaccarino;John K. Eaton

  • Inertial particle velocity and distribution in vertical turbulent channel flow: A numerical and experimental comparison

    Unknown

  • Generating and controlling homogeneous air turbulence using random jet arrays

    Unknown

  • Particle–fluid–wall interaction of inertial spherical particles in a turbulent boundary layer

    Unknown

  • Transport of inertial particles in high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers

    Unknown

  • Hemodynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm characterized by in vitro 4D flow MRI

    Omid Amili;Daniele Schiavazzi;Sean Moen;Bharathi Jagadeesan

  • Life and death of inertial particle clusters in turbulence

    Yuanqing Liu;Lian Shen;Rémi Zamansky;Filippo Coletti

Frequent Co-Authors

John K. Eaton
John K. Eaton Stanford University
Michele Guala
Michele Guala University of Minnesota
Jiarong Hong
Jiarong Hong University of Minnesota
Ali Mani
Ali Mani Stanford University
Victor H. Barocas
Victor H. Barocas University of Minnesota
Gianluca Iaccarino
Gianluca Iaccarino Stanford University
John O. Dabiri
John O. Dabiri California Institute of Technology
Luca Brandt
Luca Brandt Polytechnic University of Turin
Rebecca Fahrig
Rebecca Fahrig Siemens Healthcare (United States)
Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele
Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can broaden career prospects. For example, those interested in the healthcare dimension might consider accelerated programs like 5-year accelerated speech pathology programs, which offer a fast-track route to specialized expertise.

In addition, understanding different career pathways is crucial. Areas such as criminal profiling demonstrate how technical problem-solving skills can apply outside traditional engineering roles. Insights into criminal profiler salary and job outlook can help students evaluate opportunities in forensic science and law enforcement fields.

Those considering interdisciplinary roles might explore various counseling degrees. Detailed information about types of therapy degrees can guide students in selecting programs that align with their interests and strengths, creating diverse career options.

For individuals seeking a more manageable study load or quicker entry into the workforce, understanding the easiest degree in counseling options can be beneficial. These programs often provide flexible and supportive pathways without compromising quality education.

Best Scientists Citing Filippo Coletti

Recently Published Articles