World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
E. Kathleen Adams

E. Kathleen Adams

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
32
Citations
4051
World Ranking
3472
National Ranking
1859

E. Kathleen Adams publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Kathleen Adams sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 108 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

E. Kathleen Adams D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Kathleen Adams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Inadequate Physical Activity and Health Care Expenditures in the United States

    Susan A. Carlson;Susan A. Carlson;Janet E. Fulton;Michael Pratt;Michael Pratt;Zhou Yang

  • Impact of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on mammography and pap test utilization among white, Hispanic, and African American women: 1996–2000

    E. Kathleen Adams;Nancy Breen;Peter J. Joski

  • Hospital Choice of Rural Medicare Beneficiaries: Patient, Hospital Attributes, and the Patient–Physician Relationship

    Wan-Tzu Connie Tai;Frank W Porell;E Kathleen Adams

  • Patient satisfaction with primary care: does type of practitioner matter?

    Douglas Roblin;Edmund Becker;E Adams;David Howard

  • Neonatal health care costs related to smoking during pregnancy

    E. Kathleen Adams;Vincent P. Miller;Carla Ernst;Brenda K. Nishimura

  • Use of Midlevel Practitioners to Achieve Labor Cost Savings in the Primary Care Practice of an MCO

    Douglas W Roblin;David H Howard;Edmund R Becker;E Kathleen Adams

  • The Financial Effect of Value-Based Purchasing and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program on Safety-Net Hospitals in 2014: A Cohort Study

    Matlin Gilman;Jason M. Hockenberry;E. Kathleen Adams;Arnold S. Milstein

  • Safety-net hospitals more likely than other hospitals to fare poorly under Medicare's value-based purchasing.

    Matlin Gilman;E. Kathleen Adams;Jason M. Hockenberry;Arnold S. Milstein

  • California Safety-Net Hospitals Likely To Be Penalized By ACA Value, Readmission, And Meaningful-Use Programs

    Matlin Gilman;E. Kathleen Adams;Jason M. Hockenberry;Ira B. Wilson

  • Predicting hospital choice for rural Medicare beneficiaries: the role of severity of illness.

    Unknown

  • Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of pregnancy-related health care among Medicaid pregnant women.

    Norma I. Gavin;E. Kathleen Adams;Katherine E. Hartmann;M. Beth Benedict

  • Preventive care: Female cancer screening, 1996–2000

    E Kathleen Adams;Curtis S Florence;Kenneth E Thorpe;Edmund R Becker

  • Hospital Choice of Medicare Beneficiaries in a Rural Market: Why Not the Closest?

    Unknown

  • Impacts of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion on Women of Reproductive Age: Differences by Parental Status and State Policies.

    Emily M. Johnston;Andrea E. Strahan;Peter Joski;Anne L. Dunlop

  • Competitive effects of scope of practice restrictions: Public health or public harm?

    Sara Markowitz;E. Kathleen Adams;Mary Jane Lewitt;Anne L. Dunlop

  • Hospital Choice Models: A Review and Assessment of their Utility for Policy Impact Analysis

    Unknown

  • Prenatal care initiation among very low-income women in the aftermath of welfare reform: does pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage make a difference?

    Deborah L. Rosenberg;Arden S. Handler;Kristin Rankin;Meagan Zimbeck

  • Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version

    Jill G. Mauldin;Patrick D. Mauldin;Terry I. Feng;E.Kathleen Adams

  • Mammography rates after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation.

    David H. Howard;E. Kathleen Adams

  • Health service use and outcomes among disabled Medicaid pregnant women.

    Norma I. Gavin;M. Beth Benedict;E. Kathleen Adams

Frequent Co-Authors

Sara Markowitz
Sara Markowitz Emory University
Edmund R. Becker
Edmund R. Becker Emory University
Ira B. Wilson
Ira B. Wilson Brown University
Arnold Milstein
Arnold Milstein Stanford University
David Howard
David Howard Newcastle University
Michael Pratt
Michael Pratt University of California, San Diego
Genevieve M. Kenney
Genevieve M. Kenney Urban Institute
Willard G. Manning
Willard G. Manning University of Chicago
Terri L. Young
Terri L. Young University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing E. Kathleen Adams

Recently Published Articles