World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
4361
World Ranking
2879
National Ranking
40

Dirk Roekaerts publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Roekaerts sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 172 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Dirk Roekaerts D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Roekaerts sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Modeling of turbulent dilute spray combustion

    Patrick Jenny;Dirk Roekaerts;Nijso Beishuizen

  • Ignition kernel formation and lift-off behaviour of jet-in-hot-coflow flames

    Unknown

  • Numerical Simulation of Delft-Jet-in-Hot-Coflow (DJHC) Flames Using the Eddy Dissipation Concept Model for Turbulence–Chemistry Interaction

    Unknown

  • Flameless combustion and its potential towards gas turbines

    Unknown

  • Spectral radiative effects and turbulence/radiation interaction in a non-luminous turbulent jet diffusion flame

    Unknown

  • Role of entrainment in the stabilisation of jet-in-hot-coflow flames

    Unknown

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics for Chemical Reactor Engineering

    Unknown

  • Soot volume fraction in a piloted turbulent jet non-premixed flame of natural gas

    N.H. Qamar;Z.T. Alwahabi;Q.N. Chan;G.J. Nathan

  • Monte Carlo PDF modelling of a turbulent natural-gas diffusion flame

    P.A. Nooren;H.A. Wouters;T.W.J. Peeters;D. Roekaerts

  • Spray flame structure in conventional and hot-diluted combustion regime

    Unknown

  • Numerical investigation of burner positioning effects in a multi-burner flameless combustion furnace

    Unknown

  • Turbulence radiation interaction in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of nonpremixed piloted turbulent laboratory-scale flames

    A Habibi;B Merci;Djem Roekaerts

  • Comparative study of micromixing models in transported scalar PDF simulations of turbulent nonpremixed bluff body flames

    Bart Merci;Dirk Roekaerts;Bertrand Naud;Stephen B. Pope

  • Study of the performance of three micromixing models in transported scalar PDF simulations of a piloted jet diffusion flame ( Delft Flame III )

    Bart Merci;Dirk Roekaerts;Bertrand Naud

  • Modeling of spray jet flame under MILD condition with non-adiabatic FGM and a new conditional droplet injection model

    Unknown

  • Behavior of a 300 kWth regenerative multi-burner flameless oxidation furnace

    Unknown

  • Application of a New Cubic Turbulence Model to Piloted and Bluff-Body Diffusion Flames

    Bart Merci;Erik Dick;Jan Vierendeels;D Roekaerts

  • Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a FLOX Combustor Firing Low Calorific Value Gases

    Unknown

  • Transient response of the Delft jet-in-hot coflow flames

    Unknown

  • PDF modeling and simulations of pulverized coal combustion – Part 1: Theory and modeling

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart Merci
Bart Merci Ghent University
Ulrich Maas
Ulrich Maas Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Simone Hochgreb
Simone Hochgreb University of Cambridge
Shuzhong Wang
Shuzhong Wang Xi'an Jiaotong University
Graham J. Nathan
Graham J. Nathan University of Adelaide
Qing Nian Chan
Qing Nian Chan University of New South Wales
William A. Sirignano
William A. Sirignano University of California, Irvine
Patrick Jenny
Patrick Jenny ETH Zurich
Jan Vierendeels
Jan Vierendeels Ghent University
Christian Hasse
Christian Hasse Technical University of Darmstadt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, considering related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and provide flexible learning options. Many online programs are designed to accommodate diverse learners, including those seeking accelerated paths or affordable tuition.

When evaluating options, prospective students often look for programs with lower barriers to entry. Resources like the easiest slp masters programs to get into provide insights into programs with more accessible admissions, which can inform decisions even outside speech-language pathology fields.

Cost is another crucial factor. Understanding the full cost of online speech pathology degree programs sheds light on tuition and fees, helping students budget for their education effectively.

Veterans benefit from tailored support and flexible scheduling in many fields. Identifying military friendly online speech pathology degree programs highlights how military training can be leveraged toward engineering careers as well.

Finally, accelerated options such as 5-year accelerated speech pathology programs offer a faster route to advanced credentials, a valuable consideration for motivated students aiming to enter the workforce sooner.

Exploring these diverse pathways and program features can help Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering students make informed choices that align with their career goals and lifestyle needs.

Best Scientists Citing Dirk Roekaerts

Recently Published Articles