World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel O. Cajueiro

Daniel O. Cajueiro

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
34
Citations
5883
World Ranking
3082
National Ranking
3

Daniel O. Cajueiro publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel O. Cajueiro sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 127 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Daniel O. Cajueiro D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel O. Cajueiro sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel O. Cajueiro is affiliated with the University of Brasília in Brazil. Their research primarily focuses on Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with significant contributions in several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Artificial Intelligence, Modeling and Simulation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Finance.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics, notably in COVID-19 epidemiological studies and pandemic impacts, complex systems and time series analysis, topic modeling, banking stability, regulation, and efficiency, electoral systems, political participation, and advanced text analysis techniques.

Recent publications by Daniel O. Cajueiro include:

  • Modeling and forecasting the early evolution of the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • The impacts of interest rates on banks' loan portfolio risk-taking, 2022, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
  • A comprehensive review of automatic text summarization techniques: method, data, evaluation and coding, 2023, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Modeling and forecasting the early evolution of the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • An optimal predictive control strategy for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) social distancing policies in Brazil, 2020, Annual Reviews in Control

Daniel O. Cajueiro frequently publishes in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), SSRN Electronic Journal, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Energy Economics, and Scientific Reports.

The scientist collaborates regularly with a group of coauthors including Douglas Silveira, Régis Augusto Ely, Saulo B. Bastos, Arthur Gomes Nery, and Victor Rafael Rezende Celestino.

Best Publications

  • The Hurst exponent over time: testing the assertion that emerging markets are becoming more efficient

    Daniel O Cajueiro;Benjamin M Tabak

  • The relationship between banking market competition and risk-taking: Do size and capitalization matter?

    Benjamin M. Tabak;Benjamin M. Tabak;Dimas M. Fazio;Daniel O. Cajueiro;Daniel O. Cajueiro

  • The effects of loan portfolio concentration on Brazilian banks return and risk.

    Benjamin M. Tabak;Benjamin M. Tabak;Dimas M. Fazio;Daniel O. Cajueiro;Daniel O. Cajueiro

  • Are the crude oil markets becoming weakly efficient over time? A test for time-varying long-range dependence in prices and volatility☆

    Benjamin M. Tabak;Daniel O. Cajueiro

  • Ranking efficiency for emerging markets

    Daniel O. Cajueiro;Benjamin M. Tabak

  • Evidence of long range dependence in Asian equity markets: the role of liquidity and market restrictions

    Daniel O. Cajueiro;Benjamin M. Tabak

  • Topological properties of stock market networks: The case of Brazil

    Benjamin M. Tabak;Benjamin M. Tabak;Thiago R. Serra;Daniel O. Cajueiro;Daniel O. Cajueiro

  • Does financial market liberalization increase the degree of market efficiency? The case of the Athens stock exchange

    Daniel O. Cajueiro;Periklis Gogas;Benjamin M. Tabak;Benjamin M. Tabak

  • Modeling and forecasting the early evolution of the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil.

    Saulo B. Bastos;Daniel O. Cajueiro

  • Ranking efficiency for emerging equity markets II

    Daniel O. Cajueiro;Benjamin M. Tabak

  • The role of banks in the Brazilian interbank market: Does bank type matter?

    Daniel O. Cajueiro;Benjamin M. Tabak;Benjamin M. Tabak

  • Long-range dependence and multifractality in the term structure of LIBOR interest rates

    Daniel Oliveira Cajueiro;Benjamin Miranda Tabak

  • Testing for time-varying long-range dependence in volatility for emerging markets

    Daniel O. Cajueiro;Benjamin M. Tabak

  • Systemically important banks and financial stability: The case of Latin America

    Benjamin M. Tabak;Benjamin M. Tabak;Dimas M. Fazio;Daniel O. Cajueiro;Daniel O. Cajueiro;Daniel O. Cajueiro

  • Directed clustering coefficient as a measure of systemic risk in complex banking networks

    Benjamin M. Tabak;Marcelo Takami;Jadson M.C. Rocha;Daniel O. Cajueiro

  • An optimal predictive control strategy for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) social distancing policies in Brazil.

    Marcelo Menezes Morato;Saulo Benchimol Bastos;Daniel Oliveira Cajueiro;Julio Elias Normey-Rico

  • A comparison of DEA and SFA using micro- and macro-level perspectives: Efficiency of Chinese local banks

    Thiago Christiano Silva;Thiago Christiano Silva;Thiago Christiano Silva;Benjamin Miranda Tabak;Daniel Oliveira Cajueiro;Marina Villas Boas Dias

  • A note on the relevance of the q-exponential function in the context of intertemporal choices

    Daniel O. Cajueiro

  • Testing for predictability in equity returns for European transition markets

    Daniel O. Cajueiro;Benjamin M. Tabak

  • Testing for long-range dependence in world stock markets

    Daniel Oliveira Cajueiro;Benjamin Miranda Tabak

  • The Relationship Between Banking Market Competition and Risk-taking: Do Size and Capitalization Matter?

    Benjamin M. Tabak;Benjamin M. Tabak;Dimas M. Fazio;Daniel O. Cajueiro;Daniel O. Cajueiro

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin Miranda Tabak
Benjamin Miranda Tabak Fundação Getulio Vargas
Julio E. Normey-Rico
Julio E. Normey-Rico Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in economics or finance, exploring related online degree and certification pathways can help you reach your goals faster. Today, a wide range of flexible programs are available to fit different interests, schedules, and career plans.

Pursuing an online finance degree can offer a solid foundation in investment, financial analysis, and banking, opening doors to numerous job opportunities in the financial sector. If you’re looking to move quickly into management or leadership roles, consider one of the fastest mba programs, which allow you to earn a valuable credential in less time than traditional MBA degrees.

For those interested in accounting, obtaining a bookkeeping certification is a practical step. But with multiple options available, you may wonder which bookkeeping certification is best based on your career focus and industry needs. Alternatively, if you prefer administrative roles, an office administration degree online can provide you with versatile business and organizational skills that are highly valued in various industries.

These online degrees and certifications offer flexibility, enabling you to study at your own pace while building the expertise you need to succeed in the dynamic fields of economics and finance.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel O. Cajueiro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles