World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
53
Citations
8415
World Ranking
2940
National Ranking
1205

Charles W. Naeser publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Naeser sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 154 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Charles W. Naeser D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Naeser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1958 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Charles W. Naeser was affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their career was centered on geological studies conducted under this institution.

Naeser was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1958. This honor reflects a formal acknowledgment by a major scientific society during their professional lifetime.

Their research outputs do not include recent papers, frequent co-authors, or repeated publication venues available in the data. Similarly, details regarding books published or specific fields and subfields of study were not provided.

There is no available information on particular main topics covered by their work beyond their general affiliation with geological research. Despite the limited data on specific publications or research themes, Naeser's association with a national geological survey indicates involvement in earth science investigations and related scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Geochronology and thermal history of the Coast Plutonic Complex, near Prince Rupert, British Columbia

    T. Mark Harrison;Richard Lee Armstrong;C. W. Naeser;J. E. Harakal

  • The timing of uplift, volcanism, and rifting peripheral to the Red Sea: A case for passive rifting?

    Robert G. Bohannon;Charles W. Naeser;Dwight L. Schmidt;Robert A. Zimmermann

  • Fission track annealing in apatite and sphene

    Unknown

  • Fission-Track Dating and Geologic Annealing of Fission Tracks

    Unknown

  • Recent rapid uplift in the Bolivian Andes: Evidence from fission-track dating

    Michael T. Benjamin;Noye M. Johnson;Charles W. Naeser

  • History of Uplift and Relief of the Himalaya During the Past 18 Million Years: Evidence from Fission-Track Ages of Detrital Zircons from Sandstones of the Siwalik Group

    P. F. Cerveny;N. D. Naeser;P. K. Zeitler;C. W. Naeser

  • Age constraints on Jerritt Canyon and other carlin-type gold deposits in the Western United States; relationship to mid-Tertiary extension and magmatism

    A. H. Hofstra;L. W. Snee;R. O. Rye;H. W. Folger

  • The fading of fission tracks in the geologic environment- Data from deep drill holes

    C.W. Naeser

  • Fission-track evidence for Quaternary uplift of the Nanga Parbat region, Pakistan

    Peter K. Zeitler;Noye M. Johnson;Charles W. Naeser;Rashid A. K. Tahirkheli

  • Magnetic Polarity Stratigraphy And Mammalian Fauna Of The Deseadan (Late Oligocene-Early Miocene) Salla Beds Of Northern Bolivia

    Bruce J. MacFadden;Kenneth E. Campbell;Richard L. Cifelli;Oscar Siles

  • Unroofing history of a suture zone in the Himalaya of Pakistan by means of fission-track annealing ages

    Peter K. Zeitler;Rashid A.K. Tahirkheli;Charles W. Naeser;Noye M. Johnson

  • The occurrence and fission-track ages of late neogene and quaternary volcanic sediments, Siwalik group, Northern Pakistan

    Gary D. Johnson;Peter Zeitler;C.W. Naeser;N.M. Johnson

  • Fission Track Dating

    Unknown

  • Fission-track dating of British Ordovician and Silurian stratotypes

    R. J. Ross;C. W. Naeser;G. A. Izett;J. D. Obradovich

  • Fission-track dating of apatite and zircon: An interlaboratory comparison

    C.W. Naeser;R.A. Zimmermann;G.T. Cebula

  • Multiple ages of mid-Tertiary mineralization and alteration in the western San Juan Mountains, Colorado

    P. W. Lipman;F. S. Fisher;H. H. Mehnert;C. W. Naeser

  • The terminal eocene event and the polish connection

    J.A. Van Couvering;Marie-Pierre Aubry;Marie-Pierre Aubry;W.A. Berggren;W.A. Berggren;J.P. Bujak

  • Middle Miocene tectonic development of the Transition Zone, Salta Province, northwest Argentina: Magnetic stratigraphy from the Metan Subgroup, Sierra de Gonzalez

    J.H. Reynolds;C.I. Galli;R.M. Hernández;B.D. Idleman

  • Fission-track and K-Ar ages of natural glasses

    Charles W. Naeser;Glen Arthur Izett;John D. Obradovich

  • Oligocene and Miocene metamorphism, folding, and low-angle faulting in northwestern Utah

    Robert R. Compton;Victoria R. Todd;Robert E. Zartman;Charles W. Naeser

  • New geochronologic and palaeomagnetic data for the hominid-bearing Hadar Formation of Ethiopia

    J. L. Aronson;T. J. Schmitt;R. C. Walter;M. Taieb

  • 40 Ar/ 39 Ar, K/Ar, and fission track geochronology of sediment-hosted disseminated gold deposits at Post-Betze, Carlin Trend, northeastern Nevada

    Greg B. Arehart;K. A. Foland;C. W. Naeser;Stephen E. Kesler

  • Magnetic polarity stratigraphy, age and tectonic setting of fluvial sediments in an eastern Andean foreland basin, San Juan Province, Argentina

    Noye M. Johnson;Teresa E. Jordan;Patricia A. Johnsson;Charles W. Naeser

Frequent Co-Authors

Noye M. Johnson
Noye M. Johnson Dartmouth College
Peter K. Zeitler
Peter K. Zeitler Lehigh University
Kenneth R. Ludwig
Kenneth R. Ludwig Berkeley Geochronology Center
Edwin H. McKee
Edwin H. McKee United States Geological Survey
Bruce J. MacFadden
Bruce J. MacFadden University of Florida
Andrew J.W. Gleadow
Andrew J.W. Gleadow University of Melbourne
Robert O. Rye
Robert O. Rye United States Geological Survey
Paul E. Damon
Paul E. Damon University of Arizona
Anthony J. Hurford
Anthony J. Hurford University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens diverse career paths that often intersect with other fields. For example, those interested in information management might wonder, is a masters in library science worth it. This degree can complement Earth Science professionals who handle extensive research data and archives.

On a more creative side, visual documentation of natural phenomena is crucial. Pursuing a digital photography degree online offers skills that enhance fieldwork and reporting. Veterans may find specialized support through military friendly online photography degree programs, providing tailored benefits and flexible learning options.

Language proficiency also plays a vital role in global research and communication. For those seeking efficient and cost-effective options, the cheapest online spanish degree programs combine affordability with strong career returns, assisting Earth Science graduates in expanding their professional reach.

Choosing the right online degree related to Earth Science can broaden your expertise and enhance job prospects in this evolving field. These interdisciplinary pathways offer valuable skills to complement your core knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Charles W. Naeser

Recently Published Articles