World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 53 2940 1205 154 8415

Charles W. Naeser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles W. Naeser between 1965 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles W. Naeser published across 52 years, from 1965 to 2016, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1981. 1 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1981. 1965: 2 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 3 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 4 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 8 publications 1977: 8 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 9 publications 1981: 14 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
1965 2016

157 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles W. Naeser: publications per year, 1965 to 2016
Year Publications
1965 2
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 3
1970 2
1971 4
1972 1
1973 3
1974 1
1975 1
1976 8
1977 8
1978 4
1979 6
1980 9
1981 14
1982 8
1983 5
1984 5
1985 11
1986 4
1987 7
1988 3
1989 7
1990 10
1991 4
1992 1
1993 2
1994 6
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 2
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
Total 157
Download as CSV

Charles W. Naeser publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Naeser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 154 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495 154
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles W. Naeser D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Naeser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178 53
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1958 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Charles W. Naeser was affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their career was centered on geological studies conducted under this institution.

Naeser was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1958. This honor reflects a formal acknowledgment by a major scientific society during their professional lifetime.

Their research outputs do not include recent papers, frequent co-authors, or repeated publication venues available in the data. Similarly, details regarding books published or specific fields and subfields of study were not provided.

There is no available information on particular main topics covered by their work beyond their general affiliation with geological research. Despite the limited data on specific publications or research themes, Naeser's association with a national geological survey indicates involvement in earth science investigations and related scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Geochronology and thermal history of the Coast Plutonic Complex, near Prince Rupert, British Columbia

    T. Mark Harrison;Richard Lee Armstrong;C. W. Naeser;J. E. Harakal

  • The timing of uplift, volcanism, and rifting peripheral to the Red Sea: A case for passive rifting?

    Robert G. Bohannon;Charles W. Naeser;Dwight L. Schmidt;Robert A. Zimmermann

  • Fission track annealing in apatite and sphene

    Unknown

  • Fission-Track Dating and Geologic Annealing of Fission Tracks

    Unknown

  • Recent rapid uplift in the Bolivian Andes: Evidence from fission-track dating

    Michael T. Benjamin;Noye M. Johnson;Charles W. Naeser

  • History of Uplift and Relief of the Himalaya During the Past 18 Million Years: Evidence from Fission-Track Ages of Detrital Zircons from Sandstones of the Siwalik Group

    P. F. Cerveny;N. D. Naeser;P. K. Zeitler;C. W. Naeser

  • Age constraints on Jerritt Canyon and other carlin-type gold deposits in the Western United States; relationship to mid-Tertiary extension and magmatism

    A. H. Hofstra;L. W. Snee;R. O. Rye;H. W. Folger

  • The fading of fission tracks in the geologic environment- Data from deep drill holes

    C.W. Naeser

  • Fission-track evidence for Quaternary uplift of the Nanga Parbat region, Pakistan

    Peter K. Zeitler;Noye M. Johnson;Charles W. Naeser;Rashid A. K. Tahirkheli

  • Magnetic Polarity Stratigraphy And Mammalian Fauna Of The Deseadan (Late Oligocene-Early Miocene) Salla Beds Of Northern Bolivia

    Bruce J. MacFadden;Kenneth E. Campbell;Richard L. Cifelli;Oscar Siles

  • Unroofing history of a suture zone in the Himalaya of Pakistan by means of fission-track annealing ages

    Peter K. Zeitler;Rashid A.K. Tahirkheli;Charles W. Naeser;Noye M. Johnson

  • The occurrence and fission-track ages of late neogene and quaternary volcanic sediments, Siwalik group, Northern Pakistan

    Gary D. Johnson;Peter Zeitler;C.W. Naeser;N.M. Johnson

  • Fission Track Dating

    Unknown

  • Fission-track dating of British Ordovician and Silurian stratotypes

    R. J. Ross;C. W. Naeser;G. A. Izett;J. D. Obradovich

  • Fission-track dating of apatite and zircon: An interlaboratory comparison

    C.W. Naeser;R.A. Zimmermann;G.T. Cebula

  • Multiple ages of mid-Tertiary mineralization and alteration in the western San Juan Mountains, Colorado

    P. W. Lipman;F. S. Fisher;H. H. Mehnert;C. W. Naeser

  • The terminal eocene event and the polish connection

    J.A. Van Couvering;Marie-Pierre Aubry;Marie-Pierre Aubry;W.A. Berggren;W.A. Berggren;J.P. Bujak

  • Middle Miocene tectonic development of the Transition Zone, Salta Province, northwest Argentina: Magnetic stratigraphy from the Metan Subgroup, Sierra de Gonzalez

    J.H. Reynolds;C.I. Galli;R.M. Hernández;B.D. Idleman

  • Fission-track and K-Ar ages of natural glasses

    Charles W. Naeser;Glen Arthur Izett;John D. Obradovich

  • Oligocene and Miocene metamorphism, folding, and low-angle faulting in northwestern Utah

    Robert R. Compton;Victoria R. Todd;Robert E. Zartman;Charles W. Naeser

  • New geochronologic and palaeomagnetic data for the hominid-bearing Hadar Formation of Ethiopia

    J. L. Aronson;T. J. Schmitt;R. C. Walter;M. Taieb

  • 40 Ar/ 39 Ar, K/Ar, and fission track geochronology of sediment-hosted disseminated gold deposits at Post-Betze, Carlin Trend, northeastern Nevada

    Greg B. Arehart;K. A. Foland;C. W. Naeser;Stephen E. Kesler

  • Magnetic polarity stratigraphy, age and tectonic setting of fluvial sediments in an eastern Andean foreland basin, San Juan Province, Argentina

    Noye M. Johnson;Teresa E. Jordan;Patricia A. Johnsson;Charles W. Naeser

Frequent Co-Authors

Noye M. Johnson
Noye M. Johnson Dartmouth College
Peter K. Zeitler
Peter K. Zeitler Lehigh University
Kenneth R. Ludwig
Kenneth R. Ludwig Berkeley Geochronology Center
Edwin H. McKee
Edwin H. McKee United States Geological Survey
Bruce J. MacFadden
Bruce J. MacFadden University of Florida
Andrew J.W. Gleadow
Andrew J.W. Gleadow University of Melbourne
Robert O. Rye
Robert O. Rye United States Geological Survey
Paul E. Damon
Paul E. Damon University of Arizona
Anthony J. Hurford
Anthony J. Hurford University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens diverse career paths that often intersect with other fields. For example, those interested in information management might wonder, is a masters in library science worth it. This degree can complement Earth Science professionals who handle extensive research data and archives.

On a more creative side, visual documentation of natural phenomena is crucial. Pursuing a digital photography degree online offers skills that enhance fieldwork and reporting. Veterans may find specialized support through military friendly online photography degree programs, providing tailored benefits and flexible learning options.

Language proficiency also plays a vital role in global research and communication. For those seeking efficient and cost-effective options, the cheapest online spanish degree programs combine affordability with strong career returns, assisting Earth Science graduates in expanding their professional reach.

Choosing the right online degree related to Earth Science can broaden your expertise and enhance job prospects in this evolving field. These interdisciplinary pathways offer valuable skills to complement your core knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Charles W. Naeser

Recently Published Articles