What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Fault
- Sedimentary rock
- Seismology
His primary areas of study are Seismology, Fault, Seismic hazard, Tectonics and Paleoseismology.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Seismology, Glacial period are connected with Period and other disciplines.
Many of his research projects under Fault are closely connected to Surface, Kinematics, Oblique case and Field data with Surface, Kinematics, Oblique case and Field data, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
His Seismic hazard research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Structural basin and Holocene.
His Holocene research incorporates themes from Scale, Geodesy and Echelon formation.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Bedrock, Escarpment and Plateau in addition to Tectonics.
His most cited work include:
- Spatial and temporal variations in growth rates along active normal fault systems: an example from The Lazio–Abruzzo Apennines, central Italy (232 citations)
- Trench investigations of the 1915 Fucino earthquake fault scarps (Abruzzo, central Italy): Geological evidence of large historical events (134 citations)
- Fault scarps and deformation rates in Lazio–Abruzzo, Central Italy: Comparison between geological fault slip-rate and GPS data (92 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Alessandro Maria Michetti mainly focuses on Seismology, Seismic hazard, Fault, Tectonics and Quaternary.
In his study, Alessandro Maria Michetti carries out multidisciplinary Seismology and Intensity research.
His research in Seismic hazard intersects with topics in Landslide, Induced seismicity and Scale.
In general Fault, his work in Active fault and Fault scarp is often linked to Deformation, Surface and Field data linking many areas of study.
His Quaternary research includes elements of Structural basin, Geomorphology and Holocene.
His Holocene research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Glacial period, Pleistocene and Subsidence.
He most often published in these fields:
- Seismology (68.94%)
- Seismic hazard (27.33%)
- Fault (23.60%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Seismology (68.94%)
- Fault (23.60%)
- Structural basin (10.56%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Seismology, Fault, Structural basin, Geochemistry and Holocene.
His work in the fields of Seismology, such as Seismic hazard, Active fault and Earthquake environmental effects, overlaps with other areas such as Field data and Intensity.
His Seismic hazard research integrates issues from Archaeoseismology and Strain partitioning.
In the field of Fault, his study on Fault scarp overlaps with subjects such as Surface.
He works mostly in the field of Structural basin, limiting it down to concerns involving Pleistocene and, occasionally, Loess.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Quaternary, Vegetation and Mesolithic.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Surface ruptures following the 30 October 2016 Mw 6.5 Norcia earthquake, central Italy (73 citations)
- Dual control of fault intersections on stop-start rupture in the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence (55 citations)
- Earthquake Hazard and the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI) Scale (40 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Fault
- Sedimentary rock
- Paleontology
His primary scientific interests are in Seismology, Fault, Field data, Subduction and Geochemistry.
His Seismology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Bedrock and Geodetic datum.
His Fault study frequently links to related topics such as Quaternary.
His Subduction research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Landslide and Epicenter.
His work carried out in the field of Geochemistry brings together such families of science as Structural basin and Groundwater chemistry.
His Paleoseismology research includes themes of Glacial period, Levelling and Pleistocene.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
