A scientific researcher’s position in the ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), which exclusively considers papers and citation metrics relevant to the specific discipline under examination. This discipline-focused metric ensures that the evaluation accurately reflects a researcher’s impact within Economics and Finance rather than their overall scholarly output.
Scope of Research and Ranking Criteria
The ranking methodology entailed a thorough examination of 279,971 scientist profiles identified from diverse bibliometric sources across all scientific disciplines. Within this dataset, 3,000 scientists specializing in Economics and Finance were specifically analyzed for inclusion.
To qualify for this ranking, researchers were required to have a D-index of at least 30, with a majority of their tier publications situated in the domain of Economics and Finance. Additionally, a scientist’s awards and notable achievements within this field were carefully considered as supplementary factors. The D-index threshold is adjusted in increments of 10, relative to the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline, while ensuring that the top 1% of leading experts are incorporated into the list.
Moreover, to maintain consistency and precision in the ranking, candidates were selected only if there is a proximity of 30% or less between their general H-index and their discipline-specific D-index. This criterion helps distinguish those who demonstrate sustained excellence specifically within Economics and Finance.
Verification Processes and Methodological Rigor
Recognizing that raw bibliometric data alone cannot serve as an absolute measure of a scholar’s contributions, the researchers producing this ranking undertook extensive manual verification of scientist profiles. This process involved cross-correlation against publications indexed in a broad array of trustworthy academic databases and publication outlets.
While not a direct factor in determining ranking positions, the quantity of papers published in prominent journals and conference proceedings is recognized as a meaningful secondary indicator of a scientist’s influence and active engagement in their field.
The final ranking positions are established using each researcher’s D-index, derived from data collected through OpenAlex and CrossRef. These databases are selected for their comprehensive coverage and their standing as reliable, community-trusted sources.
For a detailed explanation of the methodology employed in this ranking, readers are encouraged to visit our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Vision
At Research.com, our mission is to inspire researchers, industry leaders, policymakers, and academic institutions worldwide to closely examine emerging trends and the trajectory of leading experts across disciplines. By providing transparent, meticulously curated rankings, we aim to facilitate recognition of the foremost contributors in specific fields of study, whether by country, institution, or area of expertise.
We believe that illuminating the accomplishments and directions of top scientists fosters collaboration, innovation, and informed decision-making in scientific research and policy. Our commitment to methodological rigor and data integrity underpins every ranking we publish, ensuring that the scientific community can rely on these evaluations as credible and valuable reference points.
