The 9th edition of Research.com ranking of the best scientists in the
arena of Computer Science was created using data
combined from various data sources including OpenAlex and
CrossRef. The bibliometric data for estimating the citation-based metrics were
acquired on 21-12-2022. Position in the ranking is based on a
scholar’s D-index (Discipline H-index), which
takes into account only papers and citation
values for an examined discipline.
Show more
The scope of our Computer Science research
Research.com’s best scholars ranking is a trustworthy
lineup of leading researchers from the field of
Computer Science, established by means of a thorough
study of 166,880 scientists discovered
from various bibliometric data sources. For the discipline of
Computer Science, more than 14402 researchers were
analysed.
What is D-index inclusion threshold for Computer Science
The D-index threshold for including a scholar to be
considered is set to 30 if
the majority of of their publications are in the area of Computer Science. The
approval criteria for scientists to be
considered into the ranking of top scholars are based on the D-index, proportion
of the contributions made within the selected field of study
plus the awards and achievements of the researchers. The
D-index threshold for considering leading scholars is
set as an increment of 10 depending on the overall number of researchers
assessed for each area od study whilst
ensuring that the top 1% of leading scientists are
added into the ranking. We expect a proximity of
30% or less between a scholar’s general H-index and their D-index.
Extra verification methods
Since our main goal is to ensure that only
genuine scientists are listed in
our ranking we believe that numbers are never
meant to be a full means to quantify the
output of scholars. For that reason
we manually check every profile and cross-correlate it against publications in a
varied range of reliable sources. Even though it’s not a
element contributing to a researcher’s position in
the ranking, the amount of documents published in
major journals and conference proceedings should form a
reliable secondary signal of their contribution to research in a
selected area of science. Position in the ranking is
based on every scholar’s D-index
using metrics gathered from OpenAlex and
CrossRef, which are the most trustworthy and well-known bibliometric
databases of this kind available to the scientific community. A
thorough explanation of our research policy
can be found on our
methodology page.
Our agenda
Our goal is to inspire scientists,
entrepreneurs and politicians
worldwide to examine where leading experts are heading
and to give a way for the whole research community to
get to know who the leading experts in specific
fields of research, in various countries, or even within research
institutions are.
Show more
Key findings for Computer Science
With 2 scholars Russia ranks in spot 52
globally.
As far as institutions are concerned, the institution with the highest number of leading scientists in Russia is Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology with 1 researchers affiliated with it being features in the Computer Science ranking. It is followed by National Research University Higher School of Economics with 1 scholars.
Prominent scholars featured in Russia are affiliated with Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
Professor Andrzej Cichocki from Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology is featured as the best scholar in Russia in our ranking with a D-index of 113. Ranking on spot no. 2 in Russia is Sergei O. Kuznetsov from National Research University Higher School of Economics with a D-index of 35.
The average D-index for the top 10% researchers is 74 in comparison to an average of 74 for all 2 researchers listed in our ranking.
The average number of publications within the field of Computer Science for the top 5% of researchers in the ranking is 536 against an average of 536 for all 2 scientists.
The average number of citations for the top 1% scholars is 28834 against an average of 28834 for all 2 scientists.
Useful resources:
