| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 532 | 135 | 220 | 14 |
| Medicine | 1516 | 115 | 206 | 16 |
Toxicology Letters generally zeroes in on subjects such as Internal medicine, Pharmacology, Endocrinology, Biochemistry and Toxicity. Internal medicine research is the primary subject tackled in Toxicology Letters with a focus on Kidney. The study on Pharmacology presented is investigated in conjunction with research in In vitro.
The journal connects research in In vitro with the related topic of In vivo. The journal connects the study in Biochemistry with the closely related area of Molecular biology.
The published papers focus on Biochemistry, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Toxicity and Pharmacology. The journal papers investigate Biochemistry research which frequently intersects with Molecular biology. In addition to Toxicity research, the journal articles aim to explore topics under Toxicology and Immunology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Toxicology Letters (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Toxicology Letters (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 74.59% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 2.46% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 2.46% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 5.91% of all publications and 89.16% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Eun Jung Park;Ji Seok Han;Eun Jun Park;Eunsol Seong
(2020)Ronald N. Kostoff;Paul Heroux;Michael Aschner;Aristides Tsatsakis
(2020)Jie Zhao;Cen Xie;Kanglong Wang;Shogo Takahashi
(2020)Nga T. Nguyen;Kuo Du;Jephte Y. Akakpo;David S. Umbaugh
(2021)Asrin Ahmadi;Hossein Niknahad;Huifeng Li;Ali Mobasheri
(2021)José Eudes Gomesm Pinheiro Júnior;Paola Zambelli Moraes;Marina Diaz Rodriguez;Maylla Ronacher Simões
(2020)Alexandra Nehring;Daniel Bury;Benedikt Ringbeck;Hans-Willi Kling
(2020)Michael-Adrien Vitoux;Karima Kessal;Stéphane Melik Parsadaniantz;Martine Claret
(2020)Yi Wen;Jackie Chen;Junya Li;Waqar Arif
(2020)For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional medical studies, a variety of related online degree programs offer valuable career pathways. Pursuing an online nutritionist degree provides a strong foundation in dietetics and wellness, essential for promoting patient health and preventive care.
Healthcare administration is another critical field, and enrolling in cahme accredited online mha programs ensures a robust education in managing health organizations effectively while meeting quality standards.
For clinicians aiming for leadership roles, online options like the doctor of nursing practice offer advanced training designed for improving clinical practice and healthcare outcomes without requiring traditional clinical hours.
Additionally, those interested in research or academic careers can explore a phd in healthcare administration online, which prepares graduates for top-tier leadership and policy-making positions in healthcare systems worldwide.
