World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Systematic Biology
H-index 46

Systematic Biology

1063-5157

Published by: Oxford University Press

https://academic.oup.com/sysbio

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Ecology and Evolution 46 210 197 40
Biology and Biochemistry 238 61 69 25

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 340
Documents by Best Scientists*: 295
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 8
SCIMAGO H-index: 208
SCIMAGO SJR: 2.945
Impact Factor: 5.7

Overview

Top Research Topics at Systematic Biology?

The aim of Systematic Biology is to expand the discussion of research in Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetic tree, Phylogenetics, Ecology and Zoology. Evolutionary biology research featured in Systematic Biology incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Lineage (evolution), Coalescent theory, Systematics, Phylogenomics and Cladistics. The Cladistics works, particularly on Cladogram are tackled in Systematic Biology.

The Phylogenetic tree works featured in the journal incorporate elements from Taxon, Statistics and Tree (data structure). Bayesian probability is a primary topic of Statistics research in it. The Phylogenetics research presented falls under the domain of Genetics.

Biogeography is part of Ecology studies tackled in it. Research on Biogeography addressed in it frequently intersections with the field of Vicariance. Specifically, studies on Taxonomy (biology) are prevalent in the Zoology works discussed.

  • Evolutionary biology (31.71%)
  • Phylogenetic tree (29.35%)
  • Phylogenetics (22.41%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. (14458 citations)
  • MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice across a Large Model Space (13299 citations)
  • New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0 (11078 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Systematic Biology:

The most cited publications are mainly concerned with subjects like Phylogenetic tree, Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetics, Statistics and Ecology. The journal papers address concerns in Phylogenetic tree which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Taxon, Zoology and Tree (data structure). The published articles explore research in Evolutionary biology alongside concepts in Coalescent theory and other areas of study in Tree rearrangement.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Genus
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Systematic Biology is mainly concerned with subjects like Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetic tree, Phylogenetics, Coalescent theory and Phylogenomics. It explores issues in Evolutionary biology which can be linked to other research areas like Clade, Taxon, Lineage (evolution), Introgression and Gene flow. The studies on Phylogenetic tree discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Tree (data structure), Inference and Data set.

The subject of Biogeography, which is connected to the field of Biological dispersal, serves as the foundation of the Phylogenetics research featured in it. The work on Coalescent theory tackled in Systematic Biology brings together disciplines like Systematics, Statistics and Genome. In addition to Phylogenomics research, it aims to explore topics under Reticulate evolution, Tree of life, DNA sequencing and Monophyly.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Phylogenomics Reveals Ancient Gene Tree Discordance in the Amphibian Tree of Life. (34 citations)
  • The Origin of the Legumes is a Complex Paleopolyploid Phylogenomic Tangle Closely Associated with the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) Mass Extinction Event (22 citations)
  • Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Data Sets: Testing Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l. (19 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Systematic Biology (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Gareth Nelson (59 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • James S. Farris (43 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • David A. Morrison (39 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • David M. Hillis (35 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • John P. Huelsenbeck (35 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Systematic Biology (based on the number of publications) are:

  • American Museum of Natural History (209 papers) published 19 papers at the last edition, 14 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of California, Berkeley (115 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • Harvard University (106 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of Michigan (102 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • National Museum of Natural History (67 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition, 7 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 34.97% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 16.08% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 20.28% of all publications and 28.67% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Top Publications

  • A Comprehensive Phylogenomic Platform for Exploring the Angiosperm Tree of Life.

    William J Baker;Paul Bailey;Vanessa Barber;Abigail Barker

    (2021)
    301 Citations
  • Interrogating Genomic-Scale Data for Squamata (Lizards, Snakes, and Amphisbaenians) Shows no Support for Key Traditional Morphological Relationships

    Frank T Burbrink;Felipe G Grazziotin;R Alexander Pyron;David Cundall

    (2020)
    299 Citations
  • Exploration of Plastid Phylogenomic Conflict Yields New Insights into the Deep Relationships of Leguminosae.

    Rong Zhang;Yin-Huan Wang;Yin-Huan Wang;Jian-Jun Jin;Gregory W Stull;Gregory W Stull

    (2020)
    265 Citations
  • Phylogenomic Resolution of the Cetacean Tree of Life Using Target Sequence Capture

    Michael R McGowen;Michael R McGowen;Georgia Tsagkogeorga;Sandra Álvarez-Carretero;Mario Dos Reis

    (2020)
    245 Citations
  • Phylogenomics Reveals Ancient Gene Tree Discordance in the Amphibian Tree of Life.

    Paul M Hime;Paul M Hime;Alan R Lemmon;Emily C Moriarty Lemmon;Elizabeth Prendini

    (2021)
    202 Citations
  • Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Data Sets: Testing Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l.

    Diego F Morales-Briones;Gudrun Kadereit;Delphine T Tefarikis;Michael J Moore

    (2021)
    157 Citations
  • The Multispecies Coalescent Over-Splits Species in the Case of Geographically Widespread Taxa.

    E Anne Chambers;David M Hillis

    (2020)
    138 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options related to Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse career pathways. For those interested in healthcare management, pursuing a health administration degree online provides essential skills in healthcare systems and leadership, complementing scientific knowledge.

Biology majors have a broad range of opportunities, including high-paying roles in research, healthcare, and biotechnology. Insights into promising job roles can be found through biology careers, helping students align their educational path with market demand.

Those eager to fast-track their education might consider an accelerated biology degree, offering a condensed timeline to enter the workforce while maintaining a strong academic foundation.

Additionally, students interested in the human body and fitness sciences can benefit from exercise science degrees online. This field blends biology with practical applications in health and wellness careers, expanding options beyond traditional laboratory roles.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal

Recently Published Articles