World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Qualitative Inquiry
H-index 13

Qualitative Inquiry

1077-8004

Published by: SAGE

https://journals.sagepub.com/home/qix

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Social Sciences and Humanities 290 21 53 13

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 26
Documents by Best Scientists*: 57
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 3
SCIMAGO H-index: 111
SCIMAGO SJR: 1.032
Impact Factor: 1.8

Overview

Top Research Topics at Qualitative Inquiry?

The journal facilitates discussions on Epistemology, Qualitative research, Narrative, Autoethnography and Gender studies. Epistemology research presented in Qualitative Inquiry encompasses a variety of subjects, including Context (language use), Reflexivity and Politics. The concepts on Qualitative research presented in Qualitative Inquiry can also apply to other research fields, including Pedagogy and Social psychology.

Narrative studies tackled cover an aspect of the field of Literature. The work on Autoethnography tackled in it brings together disciplines like Aesthetics, Psychoanalysis and Ethnography. While Aesthetics is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Poetry and Embodied cognition.

The study on Ethnography presented in it intersects with subjects under the field of Media studies. Most of the works presented in it deals with Gender studies but it intersects with the subject of Identity (social science).

  • Epistemology (28.12%)
  • Qualitative research (20.00%)
  • Narrative (16.71%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research (7793 citations)
  • Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research (2604 citations)
  • Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research: (1984 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Qualitative Inquiry:

The journal papers mainly tackle studies in Epistemology, Qualitative research, Narrative, Ethnography and Social psychology. Issues in Epistemology were discussed in the journal articles, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Reflexivity and Interpretation (philosophy). The published papers facilitate discussions on Qualitative research that incorporate concepts from other fields like Context (language use), Pedagogy, Interview and Gender studies.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Law
  • World War II
  • Epistemology

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Qualitative Inquiry investigates areas of study like Autoethnography, Qualitative research, Epistemology, Aesthetics and 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak. Qualitative Inquiry addresses concerns in Autoethnography which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Psychoanalysis, Visual arts and Ethnography. Issues in Qualitative research were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Pedagogy and Media studies.

Qualitative Inquiry explores research in Aesthetics and the adjacent study of Poetry. The in-depth study on Poetry also explores topics in the intersecting field of Narrative. The journal held discussions to help close the divide between the fields of 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Pandemic.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New: (22 citations)
  • Science With and for Society Through Qualitative Inquiry (19 citations)
  • Conventional and postqualitative research an invitation to dialogue. (6 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Qualitative Inquiry (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Yvonna S. Lincoln (28 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
  • Mirka Koro-Ljungberg (23 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Maria K. E. Lahman (22 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Graham Badley (21 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • Norman K. Denzin (21 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Qualitative Inquiry (based on the number of publications) are:

  • University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign (85 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
  • University of Georgia (57 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of South Florida (47 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Arizona State University (44 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • University of Barcelona (39 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 10.27% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 18.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.24% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.47% of all publications and 53.61% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Pathways in Qualitative Inquiry and Associated Fields

An interesting aspect of the field of qualitative inquiry that wasn't touched on in the article is its potential career pathways and job opportunities. This greatly influences how research topics are approached and studied. For instance, a common career path within this field is becoming a substance abuse counselor. In order to become one, especially in the Washington area, specific certification is required which also involves a solid grasp on qualitative inquiry for effective client treatment and counseling. For those interested in this career path, learning more about the Substance abuse counselor certification Washington can provide helpful insights. It's an excellent application of the aspects of qualitative inquiry discussed throughout this article, and offers a real-world example of how theory and research combine to create impactful careers and societal contributions.

Top Publications

  • Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New:

    Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre

    (2021)
    286 Citations
  • “With Constructivist Grounded Theory You Can’t Hide”: Social Justice Research and Critical Inquiry in the Public Sphere:

    Kathy Charmaz

    (2020)
    149 Citations
  • Why Post Qualitative Inquiry

    Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre

    (2021)
    109 Citations
  • From Doxastic to Epistemic: A Typology and Critique of Qualitative Interview Styles

    Astrid Berner-Rodoreda;Till Bärnighausen;Caitlin Kennedy;Svend Brinkmann

    (2020)
    57 Citations
  • The Lure of the New and the Hold of the Dogmatic

    Elizabeth Adams St.Pierre

    (2020)
    31 Citations
  • Saturation: An Overworked and Misunderstood Concept?

    (2023)
    28 Citations
  • Poststructuralism and Post Qualitative Inquiry: What Can and Must Be Thought

    (2022)
    27 Citations
  • Methods for Researching Automated Futures

    (2022)
    23 Citations
  • The Faces of Institutionalized Discrimination and Systemic Oppression in Higher Education: Uncovering the Lived Experience of Bias and Procedural Inequity:

    Yvonna S. Lincoln;Christine A. Stanley

    (2021)
    19 Citations
  • Making a Spectacle of Oneself in the Academy Using the H-Index: From Becoming an Artificial Person to Laughing at Absurdities

    Andrew C. Sparkes

    (2021)
    18 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse career opportunities across multiple fields. For students looking for flexibility and cost-effective options, pursuing an online interdisciplinary studies tuition costs program can be an excellent choice, combining various disciplines aligned with personal interests and career goals.

If advancement is a priority, many opt for the quickest cheapest masters degree options in History or related humanities areas, which help enhance expertise without lengthy or expensive commitments. These online degrees balance affordability and speed, making them appealing to working professionals.

For those interested in library sciences, it’s important to understand whether do you need a masters to be a librarian in the USA. Generally, a master’s degree in library science is required for most librarian roles, offering specialized knowledge and credentials needed for career growth.

Additionally, careers in communication often benefit from targeted training. Students from non-SLP backgrounds can explore online slp programs that provide bridge pathways into speech-language pathology, expanding career options while accommodating diverse academic histories and schedules.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal