Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

Top Research Topics at Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews?

The primary areas of discussion in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews are Neuroscience, Cognition, Developmental psychology, Cognitive psychology and Internal medicine. Presentations on Neuroscience include those discussing Dopamine, Neuroimaging, Prefrontal cortex, Central nervous system and Amygdala. The majority of Dopamine studies are focused on the issues of Dopaminergic.

The studies on Cognition discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Disease and Clinical psychology. While Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews focused on Clinical psychology, it was also able to explore topics like Meta-analysis and Psychiatry. The journal explores research in Developmental psychology and the adjacent study of Anxiety.

Research on Cognitive psychology addressed in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews frequently intersections with the field of Perception. Discussions in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews are anchored in the subject of Internal medicine and the similar topic of Endocrinology.

• Neuroscience (39.01%)
• Cognition (18.34%)
• Developmental psychology (14.34%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations (4171 citations)
• Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. (2110 citations)
• Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex (1747 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews:

The journal articles primarily tackle Neuroscience, Developmental psychology, Cognition, Cognitive psychology and Internal medicine. Prefrontal cortex, Amygdala, Dopamine, Central nervous system and Neuroimaging are among the areas of Neuroscience tackled in the journal papers. In addition to Developmental psychology research, the journal papers aim to explore topics under Social relation, Context (language use) and Anxiety.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:

• Giovanni Laviola (28 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Joaquim Radua (27 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
• Michael Berk (27 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 6 more than at the previous edition,
• Simon B. Eickhoff (25 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Jaak Panksepp (25 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:

• King's College London (138 papers) published 19 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
• Max Planck Society (112 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Melbourne (86 papers) published 17 papers at the last edition, 12 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Toronto (86 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Radboud University Nijmegen (84 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 2.16% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 19.38% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.59% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.40% of all publications and 54.63% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

A Look Into Criminal Psychology: Its Intersection With Current Research Topics

While Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews extensively cover Neurosciences and related fields, it would be interesting to delve into how these research topics intersect with an intriguing subject like Criminal Psychology, another significant field within psychology.

Criminal Psychology, also referred to as forensic psychology, involves understanding the minds and behaviors of criminals. Understanding areas such as cognition, the workings of the central nervous system, perception, and anxiety, as discussed in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, plays a pivotal role in comprehending criminal behavior. For instance, dysfunctions or abnormalities in areas such as Dopamine, Amygdala, and Prefrontal Cortex, pivotal study areas in Neuroscience, have been linked with criminal tendencies and behaviors.

Given that this connection between criminal psychology and neuroscience is becoming more transparent, it offers an appealing opportunity for both seasoned professionals and emerging scholars. Those interested in delving into this exciting intersection or pursuing a career in criminal psychology may consider several credible criminal psychology courses. A range of comprehensive programs by well-regarded criminal psychology colleges in Nebraska might be ideal for this purpose.

Moving forward, it would be interesting to observe an increased focus on the intersection of criminal or forensic psychology within prominent studies highlighted under Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.