| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 758 | 12 | 17 | 9 |
The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Metallurgy, Inorganic chemistry, Leaching (metallurgy), Mineralogy and Copper. Topics like Iron ore, Beneficiation, Roasting, Smelting and Nickel are tackled as part of the discussions on Metallurgy. The Iron ore works featured in it incorporate elements from Hematite and Pelletizing.
Most of the works presented in the journal deals with Pelletizing but it intersects with the subject of Pellets. Studies on Nickel discussed in it link to the field of Cobalt. It holds forums on Inorganic chemistry that merges themes from other disciplines such as Extraction (chemistry), Adsorption, Dissolution, Metal and Aqueous solution.
It emphasizes research on Leaching (metallurgy), which includes concerns such as Hydrometallurgy. Most of the Mineralogy studies addressed also intersect with Chemical engineering.
The most cited papers are mainly concerned with subjects like Metallurgy, Inorganic chemistry, Leaching (metallurgy), Mineralogy and Iron ore. The concepts on Inorganic chemistry presented in the journal articles can also apply to other research fields, including Metal ions in aqueous solution, Adsorption and Aqueous solution. The most cited papers with studies in Leaching (metallurgy) featured incorporate elements of Waste management and Dissolution.
The concepts of Metallurgy, Leaching (metallurgy), Iron ore, Nuclear chemistry and Scientific method are tackled in the journal. It focuses on Metallurgy as well as the interrelated topic of Lithium. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review explores research in Hydrometallurgy and overlapping concepts in Cobalt and Extraction (chemistry) to expand the discourse in Lithium.
Topics in Leaching (metallurgy) were tackled in line with various other fields like Secondary resource, Refractory (planetary science) and Chalcopyrite, Copper. While Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review focused on Iron ore, it was also able to explore topics like Phase (matter), Pellet, Pelletizing and Roasting. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Nuclear chemistry, it also covered topics in Solvent extraction and Methanesulfonic acid.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.33% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 32.18% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 21.84% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 24.14% of all publications and 21.84% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Feng Gao;Afolabi Uthmon Olayiwola;Biao Liu;Shaona Wang
(2021)Junfeng Wan;Hao Du;Feng Gao;Shaona Wang
(2021)Jiafeng Li;Hongying Yang;Linlin Tong;Wolfgang Sand
(2021)Jun Liu;Zhe Hu;Guangyi Liu;Yaoguo Huang
(2020)George Blankson Abaka-Wood;Jonas Addai-Mensah;William Skinner
(2021)Hammad Siddiqi;V. K. Chandaliya;A. Suresh;P. S. Dash
(2020)Zhiyong Gao;Jian Deng;Wei Sun;Jianjun Wang
(2020)Doyun Shin;Jeonghyun Park;Hyunsik Park;Jae Chun Lee
(2020)Zhili Li;Feng Rao;Shaoxian Song;Alejandro Uribe-Salas
(2020)For students studying Chemistry in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse and rewarding careers. Fields such as healthcare and medical technology often overlap with chemistry, offering practical applications of chemical knowledge. For example, those interested in combining chemistry with patient care might consider radiology tech programs online. These programs provide affordable pathways into diagnostic imaging careers where understanding chemical interactions is beneficial.
Another accessible route is through medical assistant programs that accept financial aid, which are ideal for students seeking hands-on roles that support healthcare providers. Financial aid availability helps widen access to these practical programs.
For professionals aiming to elevate their qualifications, best online DNP programs offer advanced practice opportunities in nursing without requiring clinical hours, making it easier to balance study and work.
Pharmacy careers remain closely linked to chemistry expertise. Students interested in this path should explore pharmacy school online accredited programs, which provide flexibility while meeting professional standards.
Choosing any of these related degrees can enhance your chemistry foundation and expand your career prospects across science and healthcare fields.
