| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 441 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
| Ecology and Evolution | 710 | 15 | 12 | 3 |
The journal primarily tackles Ecology, Botany, Vegetation, Agronomy and Habitat. In the Ecology research discussed, Species richness, Plant community, Introduced species, Understory and Invasive species are all tackled. The study on Species richness presented in Journal of The Torrey Botanical Society intersects with the topics under Species diversity.
Most of the Understory studies addressed also intersect with Forestry. Botany studies presented in it focus on topics such as Germination, Seedling, Taxonomy (biology), Genus and Pollination.
The most cited publications primarily focus on research topics in Ecology, Botany, Understory, Species richness and Vegetation. While Botany is the key highlight in the most cited publications, thet also covered some subjects on Agronomy and Beech bark disease. The published articles address concerns in the field of Understory by exploring it in line with topics in Forestry which intersect with Agroforestry, Canopy and Hardwood subjects.
Journal of The Torrey Botanical Society investigates studies in Botany, Ecology, Genus, Type (biology) and Old-growth forest. The journal served as a forum through which researchers explored different topics like Botany and Taxonomy (general). It concentrates on Ecology topics that focus on Lichen, Moss, Indigenous, Resource (biology) and Zamiaceae.
It explores research in Taxonomy (biology) and overlapping concepts in Morphometric analysis, Endemism, Triplaris and Morphometrics to expand the discourse in Genus. Some problems in Type (biology) that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under Vriesea, Bromeliaceae, Rosaceae and Synonym (taxonomy). The journal holds forums on Old-growth forest that merges themes from other disciplines such as Dominance (ecology), State forest, Shade tolerance and Understory.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of The Torrey Botanical Society (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of The Torrey Botanical Society (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 5.88% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 12.50% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 18.75% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.00% of all publications and 43.75% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
O. Roger Anderson;Kevin L. Griffin
(2021)Jamie M. Waterman;Anthony W. D'Amato;David R. Foster;David A. Orwig
(2020)Emily R. Nettesheim;Laura M. Ladwig;Ellen I. Damschen
(2021)For those interested in advancing their education in Plant Science and Agronomy, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Similar to fields like nursing, where programs such as direct entry msn programs online offer accelerated routes, agricultural studies also provide flexible online options for students balancing other commitments.
Choosing the right institution is crucial. Comparing programs, much like evaluating which school is better snhu vs wgu, helps ensure that learners select a curriculum that best fits their career goals and learning style in plant sciences or agronomy.
Additionally, understanding career specialization can enhance job prospects. For example, healthcare professionals are exploring niches like becoming a functional medicine np. Similarly, agronomy students may choose areas like sustainable agriculture or crop genetics to differentiate themselves in the job market.
Finally, salary outcomes vary widely by specialization, as shown in studies such as dnp salary by specialty. Prospective students should research industry trends to align their education with high-demand, rewarding careers in agriculture and plant science.
