| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 231 | 55 | 78 | 16 |
The topics of Historical geology, Archaeology, Geotourism, Geodiversity and Geopark are the focal point of discussions in the journal. The research on Historical geology featured in Geoheritage combines topics in other fields like Natural (archaeology), Earth science, Geoheritage and Environmental resource management. The research on Archaeology tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Volcano and Landform.
Volcano research is the primary subject tackled in Geoheritage with a focus on Lava. Geotourism research discussed in the journal aim to provide more information in the subject of Tourism. Topics in Geodiversity explored in the journal were investigated in conjunction with research in Natural heritage and National park.
The work tackled in the journal goes beyond the discipline of Environmental planning as it also encompasses Environmental protection.
The journal articles primarily focus on research topics in Geotourism, Historical geology, Archaeology, Environmental resource management and Tourism. Issues in Geotourism were discussed in the most cited publications, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Natural (archaeology), Environmental planning, Geodiversity, Cultural heritage and Geopark. While the most cited articles focused on Historical geology, they were also able to explore topics like Earth science, Sedimentary rock, Karst, Geoheritage and Landform.
The objective of Geoheritage is to combine knowledge in the areas of Historical geology, Geotourism, Archaeology, Geodiversity and Geopark. In addition to Historical geology research, it aims to explore topics under Natural (archaeology), Resource (biology), Cave, Geoheritage and Cultural heritage. Geotourism research presented falls under the umbrella topic of Tourism.
The concepts on Archaeology presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Outcrop and Sea level. Geoheritage explores issues in Geodiversity which can be linked to other research areas like Context (language use), Earth science, Environmental resource management, Vegetation and Lithology. While Geopark is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Volcano, Tectonics, Portuguese, Local community and Sociology of scientific knowledge.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Geoheritage (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Geoheritage (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 10.23% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.46% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 22.78% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 21.52% of all publications and 39.24% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Ilmars Gravis;Károly Németh;Chris Twemlow;Boglárka Németh
(2020)Boglárka Németh;Károly Németh;Jon N. Procter;Trisia Farrelly
(2021)Gurmeet Kaur;Anuvinder Ahuja;Som Nath Thakur;Manoj Pandit
(2020)Marie-Noëlle Guilbaud;María del Pilar Ortega-Larrocea;Silke Cram;Benjamin van Wyk de Vries
(2021)I.S. Liso;M. Chieco;A. Fiore;L. Pisano
(2020)Gurmeet Kaur;Parminder Kaur;Anuvinder Ahuja;Amritpaul Singh
(2020)Getaneh Addis Tessema;Getaneh Addis Tessema;Jan van der Borg;Amare Sewnet Minale;Anton Van Rompaey
(2021)Viktor Vereb;Viktor Vereb;Benjamin van Wyk de Vries;Miruts Hagos;Dávid Karátson
(2020)Studying Earth Science in the USA can open doors to diverse career pathways, many of which also benefit from specialized online degree programs. For students considering advanced studies, knowing how hard is it to get into speech pathology grad school can provide insight into competitive graduate programs in related health and science fields.
Cost is always a significant factor when pursuing higher education. Exploring the online speech pathology school cost gives useful context on tuition and fees, which can be comparable to certain Earth Science interdisciplinary programs offered online.
For those intrigued by practical applications of Earth Science in forensic environments, career options like becoming a forensic autopsy technician offer a unique blend of science and investigation. Learn more about this path by visiting forensic autopsy technician.
Additionally, Earth Science students with an interest in mental health and human behavior might consider online clinical psychology masters programs. These programs provide flexible opportunities to gain advanced qualifications aligned with a broad understanding of environmental and social impacts.
