Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Top Research Topics at Gastrointestinal Endoscopy?

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy was organized to reinforce research efforts on Surgery, Radiology, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology and General surgery. Many of the research works in Surgery, specifically Endoscopy, Stent and Randomized controlled trial, closely connected to disciplines like In patient. Most of the works presented in it deals with Endoscopy but it intersects with the subject of Esophagus.

The journal encompasses presentations on Radiology, specifically Endoscopic ultrasound, Biopsy and Fine-needle aspiration. It explores issues in Internal medicine which can be linked to other research areas like Oncology and Pathology.

• Surgery (36.75%)
• Radiology (24.14%)
• Internal medicine (21.48%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus (2168 citations)
• Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. (1205 citations)
• A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. (1062 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Gastrointestinal Endoscopy:

The most cited articles aim to foster the development of research in Surgery, Endoscopy, Internal medicine, Radiology and Gastroenterology. Many of the studies tackled in the journal publications connect Surgery with a similar field of study like Colonoscopy. In addition to Endoscopy research, the most cited publications aim to explore topics under Stomach, Esophagus, Esophageal disease, General surgery and Pancreatitis.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Surgery
• Cancer

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is organized to address concerns in the fields of Surgery, Radiology, Internal medicine, General surgery and MEDLINE. The in-depth study on Surgery also explores topics in the intersecting field of Adverse effect. The journal focused on Radiology research but expanded to cover Lumen (anatomy).

While Internal medicine is the focus of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, it also provided insights into the studies of Gastroenterology and Oncology. The journal connects research in MEDLINE with the related topic of Text mining. Most of the Barrett's esophagus studies addressed also intersect with Dysplasia.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (49 citations)
• Ulcer severity grading in video capsule images of patients with Crohn's disease: an ordinal neural network solution. (18 citations)
• Barrett’s esophagus after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (15 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (based on the number of publications) are:

• Todd H. Baron (429 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Mouen A. Khashab (383 papers) published 28 papers at the last edition, 7 less than at the previous edition,
• Michael B. Wallace (381 papers) published 22 papers at the last edition, 9 less than at the previous edition,
• Stuart Sherman (365 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition,
• Christopher C. Thompson (343 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 59 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (based on the number of publications) are:

• Mayo Clinic (1237 papers) published 63 papers at the last edition, 26 less than at the previous edition,
• Indiana University (438 papers) published 14 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Johns Hopkins University (436 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 24 less than at the previous edition,
• Cleveland Clinic (428 papers) published 26 papers at the last edition, 10 less than at the previous edition,
• Veterans Health Administration (412 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 11 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 60.89% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 27.63% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 6.80% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.67% of all publications and 48.90% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Comparing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy with Other Academic Journals

It would be also interesting to see how Gastrointestinal Endoscopy compares with other similar academic journals. For instance, if you are interested in broadening your research interests to complement your studies in nurse practitioner programs, you can consider looking at studies from other related fields. Especially, if you are seeking a nurse practitioner program in Tennessee, it will be essential to deeply understand the subject of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. By comparing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy with similar journals, you could gain insights into the different research topics, the most cited papers, and the experience levels of the authors. This will enable you to understand the broader academic landscape in the field of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and related studies. Moreover, comparing the citation counts can also provide a measure of the impact of the research. It could also shed light on emerging trends and most debated issues in the field. Lastly, taking note of the authors and institutions regularly contributing to these journals can show where groundbreaking research often originates. Potentially, these could be the institutions where you might want to study your nurse practitioner programs in Tennessee. Remember, a truly comprehensive and rounded research process involves exploring multiple sources and not constraining oneself to a single academic journal. This approach will not only give you a wider breadth of knowledge but could also lead you to novel and diverse ideas.