| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecology and Evolution | 574 | 8 | 21 | 6 |
Fottea facilitates discussions on Botany, Ecology, Taxon, Genus and Taxonomy (biology). The studies in Botany featured incorporate elements of 16S ribosomal RNA, Nostocales and Phylogenetic tree. Topics in Phylogenetic tree were tackled in line with various other fields like Evolutionary biology, Ribosomal RNA and Phylogenetics.
Fottea primarily discusses Ecology topics, particularly Algae, Phytoplankton, Habitat, Plankton and Flora. The journal centers on topics in Algae, with a focus on Green algae. While the journal focused on Taxon, it was also able to explore topics like Diatom, Zoology, Morphology (biology) and Biogeography.
In addition to Diatom research, it aims to explore topics under Paleontology, Species richness and Benthic zone. Fottea is mostly focused on Genus, specifically Type species. Fottea holds forums on Taxonomy (biology) that merges themes from other disciplines such as Sensu, Anabaena and Monophyly.
The most cited papers investigate areas of study like Botany, Genus, Taxon, Ecology and Taxonomy (biology). The most cited articles with studies in Botany featured incorporate elements of Polyphyly, 16S ribosomal RNA and Anabaena. The most cited articles explore topics in Genus which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Phylogenetics, Lineage (evolution) and Phylogenetic tree.
Fottea aims to foster the development of research in Genus, Botany, Taxon, Taxonomy (biology) and Diatom. The research on Genus tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Phytoplankton, Benthos, 16S ribosomal RNA, Strain (biology) and Mountain stream. In addition to Botany research, Fottea aims to explore topics under Type (biology) and Filamentous cyanobacteria.
The discussions emphasized the topic of Taxon in an attempt to further explore the field of Ecology. While Taxonomy (biology) is the key highlight in it, it also covered some subjects on Phylogenetic tree and Phylogenetics, Cosmopolitan distribution and Peninsula. Diatom research featured in it incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Biodiversity, Paleontology and Eastern china, China.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Fottea (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Fottea (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 100.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, nan% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another nan% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included nan% of all publications and nan% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Jiří Komárek;Jeffrey R. Johansen;Jan Šmarda;Otakar Strunecký
(2020)Jiří Komárek
(2020)David Heudre;Carlos E. Wetzel;Horst Lange-Bertalot;Bart Van de Vijver
(2021)Bart Van de Vijver;Käthe Robert;Andrzej Witkowski;Suncica Bosak
(2020)Bart Van de Vijver;David M. Williams;Martyn Kelly;Amelie Jarlman
(2021)John Patrick Kociolek;Qingmin You;Pan Yu;Yanling Li
(2021)Jan Kollár;Eveline Pinseel;Wim Vyverman;Aloisie Poulíčková
(2021)Saber;A b>Abdullah;Ehab F. El-Belely;Ahmed A. El-Refaey
(2020)For those interested in Ecology and Evolution, branching into health-related fields can provide unique interdisciplinary opportunities. Programs such as the best online health information management degree cahiim accredited offer robust training in managing critical health data, which is increasingly important in studies of environmental health and epidemiology.
Additionally, students looking to enter healthcare quickly might consider exploring the easiest accelerated nursing programs. These programs can prepare professionals who engage directly with the impact of environmental factors on human health.
For those interested in the administrative side, certifications such as the certified coding specialist can enhance career prospects, particularly in roles where coding and health informatics intersect with ecological data tracking.
Lastly, professionals seeking advancement in clinical practice may find the post masters fnp certification a valuable credential. This certification enables the application of ecological knowledge to patient-centered care, especially in communities affected by environmental changes.
