Economic History Review

Top Research Topics at The Economic History Review?

The Economic History Review aims to foster the development of research in Economic history, Economy, Political economy, Ancient history and Archaeology.

• Economic history (15.78%)
• Economy (11.30%)
• Political economy (7.97%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• The Collapse of Complex Societies. (1119 citations)
• The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. (1057 citations)
• The imperialism of free trade (669 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at The Economic History Review:

The published papers generally zeroe in on subjects such as Economy, Economic history, Political economy, Industrial Revolution and Market economy. Many of the studies tackled in the journal papers connect Economy with a similar field of study like Politics.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• World War II
• Law
• China

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The Economic History Review focuses on Economic history, Demographic economics, Ancient history, Colonialism and Humanities. The studies on Economic history discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Central bank, Politics, Making-of and German. Topics in Demographic economics were tackled in line with various other fields like Poverty, Wage and Human capital.

The study on Human capital presented in it intersects with subjects under the field of Numeracy. The majority of Ancient history studies in the journal are focused on the subject of Plague (disease). The journal links adjacent topics like Colonialism with Capitalism.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• The growth pattern of British children, 1850–1975† (5 citations)
• Two worlds of female labour: gender wage inequality in western Europe, 1300–1800† (3 citations)
• The German bank–growth nexus revisited: savings banks and economic growth in Prussia† (2 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in The Economic History Review (based on the number of publications) are:

• J. A. van Houtte (63 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Sidney Pollard (55 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Erich Maschke (41 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Werner Conze (34 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Frédéric Mauro (34 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in The Economic History Review (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Cambridge (245 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• London School of Economics and Political Science (203 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• University of Oxford (152 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• University of Bristol (128 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Manchester (98 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 7.14% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 29.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.69% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.58% of all publications and 45.05% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Linking Research with Education

With all the insightful research work recognized in The Economic History Review, those aspiring to delve into the world of Economic History may wonder where to kick-start their journey. It is crucial to ensure that the foundational knowledge is solid to form a strong base to grow into a qualified researcher. For this, it's pivotal to choose an institution committed to providing the necessary resources and exposure in this vast field. Many renowned universities around the world offer various courses and programs to guide you on this path. If you dream of making a tremendous positive impact through your research, ensuring quality education is the key. In particular, if you're based in South Carolina and are interested in specializing in economics or related fields, you can check out the list of best accounting programs in South Carolina. This resource will help aspiring researchers find the right platform to start their academic journey, fostering a bridge between academic education and practical research.