| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 80 | 425 | 404 | 30 |
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology investigates studies in Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Basalt, Olivine and Mantle (geology). Aside from discussions in Geochemistry, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology also deals with the subject of Plagioclase which intersects with Amphibole disciplines. While Mineralogy is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Crystallization, Mineral, Silicate, Analytical chemistry and Quartz.
The studies in Basalt featured incorporate elements of Trace element, Magma and Phenocryst, Volcanic rock. The work on Olivine tackled in it brings together disciplines like Spinel and Ultramafic rock. The research on Mantle (geology) discussed in it draws on the closely related field of Crust.
The studies on Metamorphism discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Gneiss, Granulite, Metamorphic facies and Zircon. The work on Mafic presented in it focuses on Felsic in particular. It connects the study in Metamorphic rock with the closely related area of Biotite.
The published papers tackle a plethora of topics, such as Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Basalt, Olivine and Mantle (geology). In addition to Mineralogy research, the published papers aim to explore topics under Crystallization, Quartz, Plagioclase, Silicate and Analytical chemistry. The most cited papers explore issues in Basalt which can be linked to other research areas like Trace element and Phenocryst, Volcanic rock.
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology covers a variety of subjects, including Geochemistry, Magma, Mantle (geology), Mafic and Analytical chemistry. Discussions in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology are anchored in the subject of Geochemistry and the similar topic of Craton. The study of Magma encompasses disciplines such as Plagioclase, as well as fields such as Anorthite, Layered intrusion, Pyroxene and Amphibole, all of which overlap with one another.
While work presented in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology provided substantial information on Mantle (geology), it also covered topics in Spinel, Carbonate and Olivine. Research in Continental arc and the interrelating topic of Batholith were among the subjects of interest in the Mafic studies discussed in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. It primarily dealt with subjects of interest in Analytical chemistry but also expanded the discussion to include studies in
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.59% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 21.18% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 23.53% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 18.82% of all publications and 36.47% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Daniela Rubatto;Marcel Burger;Pierre Lanari;Bodo Hattendorf
(2020)Jon Blundy;Jon Blundy;Elena Melekhova;Luca Ziberna;Madeleine C. S. Humphreys
(2020)Wendy A. Bohrson;Wendy A. Bohrson;Frank J. Spera;Jussi S. Heinonen;Jussi S. Heinonen;Guy A. Brown
(2020)Xiaobing Zhang;Feng Guo;Bo Zhang;Liang Zhao
(2020)Greta Rustioni;Andreas Audetat;Hans Keppler
(2021)Liang Guo;Liang Guo;Oliver Jagoutz;William J. Shinevar;Hong-Fei Zhang
(2020)Pursuing an Earth Science degree online opens the door to diverse career pathways, from environmental consulting to geotechnical engineering. The availability of asha accredited slpa programs online showcases how specialized programs can align with professional standards, ensuring quality education even in remote formats.
Choosing a reputable institution is crucial. Many students prioritize attending a non profit university to benefit from strong support services and recognized accreditation, factors that play a key role in career advancement within Earth Science fields.
For military personnel and veterans exploring Earth Science careers, finding good online colleges for military can provide tailored resources, flexible scheduling, and financial benefits that accommodate their unique needs.
Additionally, supplementing a degree with easy licenses and certifications to get online can enhance employability and salary potential, offering practical credentials that align with evolving industry demands in Earth Science.