Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Top Research Topics at Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions?

The scientific interests tackled in the journal are Surgery, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Radiology and Percutaneous coronary intervention. Surgery study tackled is connected to the field of Angioplasty. Myocardial infarction, Coronary artery disease, Stenosis, Revascularization and Artery are all aspects of Internal medicine research featured in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.

The study on Myocardial infarction presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Clinical endpoint. The presented studies in Hemodynamics, Valve replacement and Mace fall within the purview of Cardiology but it also intertwines with topics in In patient. The in-depth study on Valve replacement also explores topics in the intersecting field of Transcatheter aortic.

Topics in Radiology were tackled in line with various other fields like Lesion and Complication. Percutaneous coronary intervention research presented in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions encompasses a variety of subjects, including Randomized controlled trial, Conventional PCI and Acute coronary syndrome. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions encompasses presentations on Stent, specifically Restenosis, Drug-eluting stent and Coronary stent.

• Surgery (48.52%)
• Internal medicine (45.83%)
• Cardiology (43.36%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement (460 citations)
• 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. (443 citations)
• Erosion of Amplatzer septal occluder device after closure of secundum atrial septal defects: Review of registry of complications and recommendations to minimize future risk (442 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions:

The most cited articles focus on Surgery, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Angioplasty and Radiology. The most cited articles explore research in Surgery and the adjacent study of Stenosis. The most cited publications with studies in Cardiology featured incorporate elements of Stroke and Catheter.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (based on the number of publications) are:

• Antonio Colombo (176 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Morton J. Kern (168 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Emmanouil S. Brilakis (150 papers) published 14 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Roxana Mehran (145 papers) published 16 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Lowell F. Satler (132 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (based on the number of publications) are:

• Boston Children's Hospital (278 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 6 less than at the previous edition,
• Mayo Clinic (269 papers) published 33 papers at the last edition, 13 more than at the previous edition,
• Harvard University (256 papers) published 17 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Cleveland Clinic (205 papers) published 26 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• MedStar Washington Hospital Center (197 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 9 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 11.67% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 23.58% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.94% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.90% of all publications and 48.58% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Employment Opportunities and Career Advancement in Cardiology and Related Fields

One potential missing section is a section that discusses real-life applications of these research trends, such as how they can influence career prospects and opportunities for advancement in related fields. This would not only be helpful for readers but it would also provide valuable context to the topic. For instance, those researching and gaining knowledge in Surgery, Internal Medicine, and Cardiology, the top three research areas in the Journal, could be looking at promising career pathways. Be it as physician, a nurse practitioner specializing in Cardiovascular medicine, or a medical researcher, there are diverse opportunities in these fields. Understanding the research trends and being able to contribute to them sets one apart in these competitive fields.

For example, if you're living in Kentucky and thinking about becoming a nurse practitioner specializing in Cardiology, knowing the latest trends and hottest research topics in this field can immensely contribute to growing your career. You can read more on this topic on our detailed guide on how to become a nurse practitioner in Kentucky. This guide can equip you with the knowledge and strategies to prepare you not only to become a nurse practitioner but one who is proficient and updated with the latest trends in Cardiology.

At the end of the day, it's not just about understanding the research trends and most cited articles in your field. It's about applying this knowledge to real-life situations and using it to enrich your career and ultimately contribute to the advancement of healthcare.