| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 250 | 292 | 302 | 29 |
Catalysis, Inorganic chemistry, Organic chemistry, Selectivity and Chemical engineering are the subjects of interest in Catalysis Communications. The Catalysis works, particularly on Photocatalysis are tackled in Catalysis Communications. Photocatalysis study tackled is connected to the field of Visible spectrum.
Methanol, Nanoparticle, Metal, Calcination and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy are some topics wherein Inorganic chemistry research discussed in Catalysis Communications have an impact. Topics in Organic chemistry explored in it were investigated in conjunction with research in Medicinal chemistry and Polymer chemistry. Selectivity and Zeolite are closely related fields of research discussed in the journal.
Catalysis Communications addresses concerns in Chemical engineering which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Nanotechnology and Mesoporous material.
The most cited articles are organized to address concerns in the fields of Catalysis, Inorganic chemistry, Organic chemistry, Chemical engineering and Selectivity. Catalysis research is the primary subject tackled in the journal articles with a focus in Photocatalysis. Aside from discussions in Inorganic chemistry, the journal papers also deal with the subject of Methane which intersects with Carbon dioxide reforming disciplines.
Catalysis, Chemical engineering, Selectivity, Nuclear chemistry and Inorganic chemistry are among the topics commonly tackled in the journal. Catalysis Communications explores the study of Catalysis to improve our understanding of the broader topic of Organic chemistry. It focuses on Chemical engineering but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Photocatalysis, Carbon, NOx and Oxide.
The close relationship between Zeolite and Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory is one of the points of interest dissected in Selectivity research. The research on Nuclear chemistry featured in it combines topics in other fields like Acetic acid, Phase (matter), Oxygen and Doping. It holds forums on Inorganic chemistry that merges themes from other disciplines such as Decomposition and Methane.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Catalysis Communications (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Catalysis Communications (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 9.29% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 12.65% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 12.05% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.66% of all publications and 59.64% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Jamal Rahimi;Reza Taheri-Ledari;Maryam Niksefat;Ali Maleki
(2020)Unknown
(2023)Jingjing Guo;Weinan Yang;Yani Zhang;Lina Gan
(2020)Xianguang Meng;Xianguang Meng;Peixiao Zong;Liang Wang;Fan Yang
(2020)Paulina Rokicka-Konieczna;Agnieszka Wanag;Agnieszka Sienkiewicz;Ewelina Kusiak-Nejman
(2020)Nasar Mansir;Siow Hwa Teo;Siow Hwa Teo;Nurul-Asikin Mijan;Nurul-Asikin Mijan;Yun Hin Taufiq-Yap;Yun Hin Taufiq-Yap
(2021)Georgios Varvoutis;Maria Lykaki;Sofia Stefa;Eleni Papista
(2020)Xiang-Xiang Wang;Sugang Meng;Sujuan Zhang;Xiuzhen Zheng
(2020)Chunhua Wang;Anjie Wang;Zhiquan Yu;Yao Wang
(2021)For students interested in expanding their education beyond a Chemistry degree, there are several online degree programs that can complement or diversify career opportunities. For those inclined towards healthcare, exploring the easiest nurse practitioner degree programs can provide a practical route to advanced clinical roles without the extensive prerequisites of traditional pathways.
Another viable option is the growing field of healthcare administration, where roles such as medical billing and coding are critical. Learning about the medical billing and coding jobs reveals a stable career path that benefits from attention to detail and offers flexibility, often through remote work opportunities.
Additionally, professionals looking to upgrade their nursing qualifications may find programs like rn to bsn without clinicals appealing. These programs help bridge the gap between registered nursing and advanced nursing practice, with an emphasis on theoretical coursework that can be completed online.
For those aiming for the highest levels of nursing practice, exploring online dnp programs offers a streamlined path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree, blending online flexibility with clinical expertise. Together, these related online degrees provide a broad spectrum of options for Chemistry graduates seeking versatile and impactful careers.
