| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 519 | 28 | 35 | 11 |
| Engineering and Technology | 960 | 15 | 20 | 8 |
The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Microfluidics, Nanotechnology, Biomedical engineering, Analytical chemistry and Electrode. In addition to Microfluidics research, the journal aims to explore topics under Biophysics, Microchannel, Chromatography, Optoelectronics and Polydimethylsiloxane. The journal facilitates discussions on Nanotechnology that incorporate concepts from other fields like Chip, Polymer and Microfabrication.
The research on Biomedical engineering featured in the journal combines topics in other fields like Cell culture, Cell, Drug delivery and In vivo. Studies on Cell culture discussed in the journal link to the field of Cell biology. More specifically, the research on Electrode in it is related to Microelectrode.
The published papers mainly deal with areas of study such as Nanotechnology, Microfluidics, Biomedical engineering, Analytical chemistry and Cell culture. The most cited publications hold forums on Nanotechnology that merge themes from other disciplines such as Electrode, Chip, Polymer and Microfabrication. The journal papers explore research in Microelectromechanical systems and overlapping concepts in Micropump to expand the discourse in Biomedical engineering.
Biomedical Microdevices investigates areas of study like Biomedical engineering, Electrode, Microfluidics, Biocompatibility and Volumetric flow rate. The work on Biomedical engineering tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Diffusion assay, Organ-on-a-chip and Perfusion. In Biomedical Microdevices, Electrical impedance and Optoelectronics, Electrical measurements are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Electrode research.
Lab-on-a-chip is part of Microfluidics studies tackled in Biomedical Microdevices. The presentations focused mostly on Microchannel in an attempt to further explore topics in Nanotechnology. The study on Nanotechnology featured in the journal expounds on the topic of Drug delivery in particular.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Biomedical Microdevices (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Biomedical Microdevices (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.57% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 1.85% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.41% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.11% of all publications and 79.63% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Chiara A. M. Fois;Aaron Schindeler;Aaron Schindeler;Peter Valtchev;Fariba Dehghani
(2021)Can Huang;Jose A Wippold;Dimitra Stratis-Cullum;Arum Han
(2020)Tianqi Liu;Guohua Jiang;Gao Song;Gao Song;Jiangying Zhu;Jiangying Zhu
(2020)Jinglong Liu;Zhaoyang Liu;Xin Li;Lihang Zhu
(2020)Lei Zhang;Baoe Li;Xianlin Zhang;Donghui Wang
(2020)Kan-Zhi Liu;Ganghong Tian;Alex C.-T. Ko;Matthias Geissler
(2020)Zhenqing Li;Yadong Li;Shinichi Sekine;Heqi Xi
(2020)Zixiang Wang;Lin Cheng;Xiaoyun Wei;Bo Cai
(2020)Xiao Li;Man Zhang;Yujie Hu;Jian Xu
(2020)For students interested in Chemistry and related fields, exploring online degree options can open up diverse career paths. Programs like online radiology tech programs offer specialized training in medical imaging, blending chemistry with healthcare technology. These programs are often affordable and accessible, making them a practical choice for many.
Those considering support roles in healthcare might find value in online medical assistant programs fafsa approved. Financial aid options like FAFSA approval increase accessibility for students seeking flexible, online healthcare education.
Advanced nursing professionals can advance their careers through msn to dnp programs, which often include options to complete a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree online without clinicals, providing convenience for working nurses balancing education with professional commitments.
For those interested in pharmaceutical sciences, choosing an pharmacy school online accredited ensures a credible and recognized pathway toward becoming a licensed pharmacist, blending chemistry knowledge with patient care and medication management.
Overall, these online degrees provide flexible, accredited pathways for building a career that intersects with Chemistry in healthcare and medicine, accommodating diverse learning needs and professional goals.
