| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 509 | 14 | 24 | 5 |
Ars Mathematica Contemporanea mainly tackles studies in Combinatorics, Discrete mathematics, Graph, Automorphism and Cayley graph. Combinatorics and Order (group theory) are closely related fields of research discussed in it. It aims to address concerns in Discrete mathematics, specifically in the areas of Indifference graph, Symmetric graph, 1-planar graph, Pathwidth and Line graph.
The majority of 1-planar graph studies presented zero in on Cograph. The journal facilitates discussions on Graph that incorporate concepts from other fields like Eigenvalues and eigenvectors and Automorphism group. Research on Automorphism addressed in it frequently intersections with the field of Transitive relation.
The most cited papers are mainly concerned with subjects like Combinatorics, Discrete mathematics, Graph, Chordal graph and Indifference graph. The presentations in the published papers discussing Combinatorics offer insights in topics such as 1-planar graph, Polytope, Wiener index, Automorphism and Line graph. The published articles explore issues in Graph which can be linked to other research areas like Chromatic scale, Eigenvalues and eigenvectors and Conjecture.
Ars Mathematica Contemporanea mainly deals with areas of study such as Combinatorics, Graph, Vertex (geometry), Type (model theory) and Order (group theory). The journal focuses on Combinatorics research which is adjacent to topics in Set (abstract data type). The presented studies in Outerplanar graph fall within the purview of Graph but it also intertwines with topics in The Intersect.
The work on Vertex (geometry) tackled in it brings together disciplines like Time complexity, Homogeneous space, Conjecture, Graph property and Simple (abstract algebra). Topics in Type (model theory) were tackled in line with various other fields like Point (geometry), Word (group theory), Primitive permutation group and Projective test. The concepts on Order (group theory) presented in Ars Mathematica Contemporanea can also apply to other research fields, including Dihedral group, Group (mathematics), Pure mathematics, Prime (order theory) and Cayley graph.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Ars Mathematica Contemporanea (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Ars Mathematica Contemporanea (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 20.34% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 21.28% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 4.26% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 10.64% of all publications and 63.83% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Ebrahim Ghorbani;Willem H. Haemers;Hamid Reza Maimani;Leila Parsaei Majd
(2020)Sandi Klavžar;Douglas F. Rall;Ismael Gonzalez Yero
(2021)Paul M. Terwilliger
(2021)Marco Buratti;Douglas Robert Stinson
(2020)Sebastian M. Cioabă;Krystal Guo;Willem H. Haemers
(2021)Shaofei Du;Klavdija Kutnar;Dragan Marušič
(2020)Stephen P. Glasby;Emilio Pierro;Cheryl E. Praeger
(2021)Exploring a Mathematics degree in the USA opens numerous pathways, including fields like finance, engineering, data science, and education. For those considering interdisciplinary growth, related online degrees can enhance career prospects and offer flexibility. For example, pursuing the cheapest online marketing degree can complement analytical skills with business acumen, ideal for roles in market research or analytics.
Similarly, professionals looking to advance into leadership positions might find the one year MBA an efficient way to gain management expertise without a long time commitment. This pathway is highly recommended for mathematicians aiming for executive roles or entrepreneurial ventures.
Students interested in human capital and organizational management can explore online human resource management masters programs. These degrees complement analytical backgrounds with people management skills, opening doors to HR analytics and strategic roles.
For those inclined towards healthcare analytics or biostatistics, the best online nursing programs provide a route into the nursing field, blending clinical insights with quantitative expertise. This diversity in online programs ensures that Mathematics graduates can tailor their education to evolving job markets while benefiting from affordable and flexible learning options.
