Published by: Elsevier
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/archaeological-research-in-asia
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 470 | 14 | 16 | 6 |
The objective of Archaeological Research in Asia is to combine knowledge in the areas of Archaeology, China, Prehistory, Bronze Age and Period (geology). Holocene, Radiocarbon dating, Excavation, Assemblage (archaeology) and Cave are some of the study areas of Archaeology discussed. The close relationship between Pleistocene and Biological dispersal is one of the points of interest dissected in Holocene research.
The research on Excavation featured in it combines topics in other fields like Context (language use) and Pottery. Urbanization, Urbanism and Economy are some topics wherein China research discussed in it have an impact. Prehistory research presented in Archaeological Research in Asia encompasses a variety of subjects, including Mainland, Plateau and Ethnology.
The research on Bronze Age tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Range (biology), Steppe, Craft production and Bronze. It addresses concerns in Period (geology) which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Chronology and Human settlement. The majority of Ecology studies are focused on the issues of Agriculture.
The most cited publications focus largely on the fields of Archaeology, Agriculture, South asia, Ancient history and Holocene. The most cited publications aim to address concerns in Archaeology, specifically in the areas of Prehistory, Bead, Craft production, Chronology and Assemblage (archaeology). While work presented in the most cited articles provide substantial information on Holocene, it also covers topics in Period (geology), Rock art and Sedentism.
Archaeological Research in Asia mainly tackles studies in Archaeology, Holocene, Bronze Age, Prehistory and Excavation. The journal explores research in Archaeology alongside concepts in Context (language use) and other areas of study in China and Social organization. Some problems in Holocene that were presented in Archaeological Research in Asia overlapped with concepts under Bow and arrow, Pleistocene, Paleosol, Physical geography and Chronology.
While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Bronze Age, it also covered topics in Haplogroup Z, Ancient DNA and Herbivore. Issues in Prehistory were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Mainland, Anatomy and Age at death. The concepts on Excavation presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Structural basin and Domestication.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Archaeological Research in Asia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Archaeological Research in Asia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 12.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 40.91% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 25.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.91% of all publications and 18.18% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Franziska Kobe;Elena V. Bezrukova;Christian Leipe;Christian Leipe;Alexander A. Shchetnikov
(2020)Anindya Sarkar;Arati Deshpande Mukherjee;Shubhra Sharma;Torsa Sengupta
(2020)Yew Seng Tai;Patrick Daly;E. Edwards Mckinnon;Andrew Parnell
(2020)Maria Guagnin;Ceri Shipton;Louise Martin;Eleanor Kingwell-Banham
(2021)Nils Vanwezer;William Timothy Treal Taylor;William Timothy Treal Taylor;Jamsranjav Bayarsaikhan;Sebastian F.M. Breitenbach
(2021)Meir Finkel;Avi Gopher;Aviad Agam;Aviad Agam
(2020)Cloé Georjon;U. Aung Aung Kyaw;Daw Tin Tin Win;Daw Thu Thu Win
(2021)Exploring Earth Science opens doors to a variety of related fields that also emphasize understanding the natural world and improving lives. For those interested in mental health, clinical psychology masters programs offer robust online options, allowing students to study remotely while preparing for impactful careers.
Another growing field connected to Earth Science’s emphasis on human well-being is speech therapy. Individuals considering a career change can learn about the speech language pathologist salary and job outlook, essential information for anyone pursuing this rewarding healthcare profession.
Importantly, those seeking to become certified speech language pathologists should consider asha accredited programs. These online degrees meet the strict standards required for accreditation, ensuring quality education and eligibility for licensure.
When choosing an institution, it’s wise to consider the reputation and affordability of your online degree. non profit online colleges often provide accredited, high-quality programs with a student-focused approach, making them excellent choices for many learners.
