World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
World Scientific

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB)

Location: Hawaii , United States

Submission deadline: 8/1/2022

Conference dates: 1/3/2023 - 1/7/2023

Research H-index
10

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Medicine 21 28 46 5
Biology and Biochemistry 10 29 67 6
Computer Science 445 31 57 8
Genetics 4 20 35 4

Call for Papers

PSB will bring together top researchers from North America, the Asian Pacific nations, Europe and around the world to exchange research results and address open issues in all aspects of computational biology. PSB will provide a forum for the presentation of work in databases, algorithms, interfaces, visualization, modeling and other computational methods, as applied to biological problems, with emphasis on applications in data-rich areas of molecular biology. PSB intends to attract a balanced combination of computer scientists and biologists, presenting significant original research, demonstrating computer systems, and facilitating formal and informal discussions on topics of importance to computational biology.

To provide focus for the very broad area of biological computing, PSB is organized into a series of specific sessions. Each session will involve both formal research presentations and open discussion groups.

Digital health technology data in biocomputing: Research efforts and considerations for expanding access
Graph Representations and Algorithms in Biomedicine
Overcoming health disparities in precision medicine
Precision Medicine: Using computation and artificial intelligence to improve healthcare and public health
SALUD: Scalable Applications of cLinical risk Utility and preDiction
Towards Ethical Biomedical Informatics

Overview

This comprehensive ranking presents the most influential scientific conferences within the field of Computer Science, providing a valuable resource for academics, researchers, and professionals seeking authoritative insights. The ranking has been meticulously prepared by Research.com, a leading source for science research across major disciplines, including Computer Science, and renowned for delivering trusted data on scientific contributions since 2014.

Each conference’s position in the ranking is determined by a unique bibliometric score devised by Research.com. This score rigorously incorporates both the estimated h-index of the conference and the number of leading scientists who have contributed to it over the past three years, ensuring that the rankings accurately reflect both scholarly impact and active participation by prominent experts.

The Impact Score values included in this ranking were collected as of 2024-11-27, guaranteeing up-to-date and relevant assessment. The process of compiling the rankings entailed an exhaustive review of more than 2,742 conferences, selected following a detailed and rigorous examination of over 148,739 scientific documents published in the last three years by a distinguished cohort of 13,184 leading scientists in Computer Science. This rigorous approach underscores the depth of research and the complexity of analysis employed by our expert team.

For a thorough understanding of the detailed methodology used to compute these ranking scores, including specific bibliometric indicators and criteria, readers are invited to consult our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing at Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Marylyn D. Ritchie (16 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
  • Russ B. Altman (13 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Jason H. Moore (10 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
  • Dana C. Crawford (10 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Sarah A. Pendergrass (8 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Stanford University (48 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • Vanderbilt University (18 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • Pennsylvania State University (16 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • Case Western Reserve University (14 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Dartmouth College (13 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2016 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 54.55% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 5.45% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.55% of all publications and 25.45% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online computer science degrees offers flexibility and accessibility for students across the globe. Many learners prioritize affordability, which is why programs like the computer science bachelor degree online have gained popularity. These programs provide solid foundations at a lower cost compared to traditional on-campus options.

For those with a military background, specialized options such as online cybersecurity degree programs for veterans create tailored pathways that leverage prior experience and support veteran students through their transition into civilian tech careers.

The growth of artificial intelligence has introduced new career roles like AI trainers, who play a crucial role in developing and refining AI systems. Understanding the skills, salary, and career trajectories of ai trainers can help aspiring professionals navigate this emerging field effectively.

Additionally, expanding your expertise through targeted learning can be achieved by enrolling in the best online cyber security courses. These courses often offer certificates that boost credentials and open doors to a wide range of IT security roles.

Best Scientists who published in this Conference

Related Articles