World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
7613
World Ranking
18452
National Ranking
1444

Terence A. Brown publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terence A. Brown sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 163 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Terence A. Brown D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terence A. Brown sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Terence A. Brown is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Within these fields, their work focuses notably on Plant Science, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with additional interests in Atmospheric Science and Endocrinology.

Their publications reflect a strong emphasis on wheat and barley genetics and pathology, genetic diversity and population structure, and genetic mapping and diversity in plants and animals. Related research topics also include plant and fungal interactions, studies on yeasts and rust fungi, tree-ring climate responses, and aspects of archaeology and ancient environmental studies.

Terence A. Brown has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Ancient DNA typing indicates that the "new" glume wheat of early Eurasian agriculture is a cultivated member of the Triticum timopheevii group, 2020, Journal of Archaeological Science
  • Multiregional origins of the domesticated tetraploid wheats, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Episodes of gene flow and selection during the evolutionary history of domesticated barley, 2021, BMC Genomics
  • Climatic controls on the survival and loss of ancient types of barley on North Atlantic Islands, 2023, Climatic Change
  • Genetic erosion in domesticated barley and a hypothesis of a North African centre of diversity, 2024, Ecology and Evolution

Their frequent coauthors include Peter Civáň, Konstantina Drosou, B. Czajkowska, Hugo R. Oliveira, and Sandra Kennedy. Most of their collaborative work has involved topics related to plant genetics and evolutionary biology.

In terms of publication venues, Terence A. Brown has multiple works featured in the Journal of Archaeological Science, with additional contributions to PLoS ONE, Climatic Change, BMC Genomics, and Ecology and Evolution.

Best Publications

  • Making ends meet: a model for RNA splicing in fungal mitochondria

    R. Wayne Davies;Richard B. Waring;John A. Ray;Terence A. Brown

  • SELENIUM: TOXICITY AND TOLERANCE IN HIGHER PLANTS

    T. A. Brown;A. Shrift

  • The complex origins of domesticated crops in the Fertile Crescent

    Terence A. Brown;Martin K. Jones;Wayne Powell;Robin G. Allaby

  • The genetic expectations of a protracted model for the origins of domesticated crops

    Robin G. Allaby;Dorian Q. Fuller;Terence A. Brown

  • Gene cloning: an introduction.

    T. A. Brown

  • Population-Based Resequencing Reveals That the Flowering Time Adaptation of Cultivated Barley Originated East of the Fertile Crescent

    Huw Jones;Fiona J. Leigh;Ian Mackay;Mim A. Bower

  • Three geographically separate domestications of Asian rice.

    Peter Civáň;Hayley Craig;Cymon J. Cox;Terence A. Brown

  • Exclusion of Selenium from Proteins of Selenium-Tolerant Astragalus Species

    Terence A. Brown;Alex Shrift

  • Evolution of the high molecular weight glutenin loci of the A, B, D, and G genomes of wheat

    Robin G. Allaby;Monica Banerjee;Terence A. Brown

  • Close relationship between certain nuclear and mitochondrial introns. Implications for the mechanism of RNA splicing.

    R.B. Waring;C. Scazzocchio;T.A. Brown;R.W. Davies

  • The limits of biomolecular palaeopathology: ancient DNA cannot be used to study venereal syphilis

    Abigail S. Bouwman;Terence A. Brown

  • Sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifolia ): a beneficial forage legume

    Christine Hayot Carbonero;Irene Mueller-Harvey;Terence A. Brown;Lydia Smith

  • How ancient DNA may help in understanding the origin and spread of agriculture

    Terence A. Brown

  • Internal structure of a mitochondrial intron of Aspergillus nidulans

    R B Waring;R W Davies;C Scazzocchio;T A Brown

  • DNA from primitive maize landraces and archaeological remains: implications for the domestication of maize and its expansion into South America

    Fabio Oliveira Freitas;Gerhard Bendel;Robin G. Allaby;Terence A. Brown

  • Genotype of a historic strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Abigail S. Bouwman;Sandra L. Kennedy;Romy Müller;Richard H. Stephens

  • GluDy allele variations in Aegilops tauschii and Triticum aestivum: implications for the origins of hexaploid wheats.

    Rachel J. Giles;Terence A. Brown

  • Deficiencies and challenges in the study of ancient tuberculosis DNA

    Alicia K. Wilbur;Abigail S. Bouwman;Anne C. Stone;Charlotte A. Roberts

  • The Aspergillus nidulans mitochondrial genome

    T A Brown;R B Waring;C Scazzocchio;R W Davies

  • AFLP data and the origins of domesticated crops

    Robin G Allaby;Terence A Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Scazzocchio
Claudio Scazzocchio Imperial College London
Wayne Powell
Wayne Powell Scotland's Rural College
Huw Jones
Huw Jones Aberystwyth University
Cymon J. Cox
Cymon J. Cox University of Algarve
Richard P. Evershed
Richard P. Evershed University of Bristol
Richard F. Preziosi
Richard F. Preziosi Plymouth University
Ian Mackay
Ian Mackay National Institute of Agricultural Botany
Daniel J. Turner
Daniel J. Turner Wellcome Sanger Institute
Alessio Papini
Alessio Papini University of Florence
Jérôme Salse
Jérôme Salse INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of rewarding careers, many of which now offer flexible online study options. For those looking to quickly enter the healthcare field, rad tech online programs provide a path to jobs in radiologic technology, blending science with hands-on patient care.

Nutrition science is another growing area. Professionals interested in advanced credentials should consider the top dietetics masters programs, which prepare you for specialized roles in dietetics, wellness, and research.

Entry-level healthcare careers are also accessible through online medical assistant programs with financial aid, making training more affordable for students in any location.

If you're already a medical assistant, moving up the career ladder is possible with ma to lpn bridge programs online, designed to help you become a licensed practical nurse.

By leveraging these flexible online education options, you can create a personalized career path within the life sciences, healthcare, and biotechnology sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Terence A. Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles