World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
43
Citations
8390
World Ranking
4896
National Ranking
246

Stephen F. Cox publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Cox sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 100 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Stephen F. Cox D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Cox sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Sedimentary rock
  • Mineral

His primary areas of study are Permeability, Fault, Geochemistry, Fluid dynamics and Hydrothermal circulation. His work deals with themes such as Porosity and Dissolution, which intersect with Permeability. His work on Pressure solution is typically connected to Cementation as part of general Porosity study, connecting several disciplines of science.

His study in Fault is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Shear, Geotechnical engineering, Poromechanics and Shear stress. He has researched Geochemistry in several fields, including Fold and Shear zone. His Fluid dynamics research incorporates themes from Geophysics, Crust, Coupling and Petroleum engineering.

His most cited work include:

  • High fluid pressures during regional metamorphism and deformation: Implications for mass transport and deformation mechanisms (465 citations)
  • Faulting processes at high fluid pressures: An example of fault valve behavior from the Wattle Gully Fault, Victoria, Australia (281 citations)
  • Principles of Structural Control on Permeability and Fluid Flow in Hydrothermal Systems (262 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Stephen F. Cox focuses on Geochemistry, Fluid dynamics, Mineralogy, Permeability and Slip. Stephen F. Cox has included themes like Fold, Shear zone and Geomorphology in his Geochemistry study. In his research, Dilatant, Induced seismicity and Deformation is intimately related to Petrology, which falls under the overarching field of Fluid dynamics.

His Mineralogy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Quartz and Grain boundary. His studies in Permeability integrate themes in fields like Porosity, Hydrothermal circulation and Differential stress. His research in Slip intersects with topics in Seismology and Shear.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Geochemistry (23.08%)
  • Fluid dynamics (21.98%)
  • Mineralogy (20.88%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Slip (19.78%)
  • Fracture (6.59%)
  • Asperity (3.30%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Slip, Fracture, Asperity, Fluid viscosity and Nucleation. Slip combines with fields such as Forensic engineering, Political science, Scholarship, Training program and Research council in his investigation. His Fracture research includes themes of Fluid dynamics, Hydrothermal circulation and Permeability.

His Asperity research incorporates elements of Molecular vibration, Dynamic pressure, Spectral line, Quenching and Millisecond. Geotechnical engineering and Fault slip are fields of study that intersect with his Nucleation study.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Melt Welding and Its Role in Fault Reactivation and Localization of Fracture Damage in Seismically Active Faults (10 citations)
  • Rheological Controls on Asperity Weakening During Earthquake Slip (4 citations)
  • Rupture nucleation and fault slip: Fracture versus friction (1 citations)

Best Publications

  • High fluid pressures during regional metamorphism and deformation: Implications for mass transport and deformation mechanisms

    M. A. Etheridge;V. J. Wall;S. F. Cox;R. H. Vernon

  • Principles of Structural Control on Permeability and Fluid Flow in Hydrothermal Systems

    Stephen Cox;Mark Knackstedt;Jean Braun

  • Faulting processes at high fluid pressures: An example of fault valve behavior from the Wattle Gully Fault, Victoria, Australia

    Stephen F. Cox

  • Coupling between Deformation, Fluid Pressures, and Fluid Flow in Ore-Producing Hydrothermal Systems at Depth in the Crust

    Stephen F. Cox

  • Deformational and metamorphic processes in the formation of mesothermal vein-hosted gold deposits — examples from the Lachlan Fold Belt in central Victoria, Australia

    S.F. Cox;V.J. Wall;M.A. Etheridge;T.F. Potter

  • Crack-seal fibre growth mechanisms and their significance in the development of oriented layer silicate microstructures

    S.F. Cox;M.A. Etheridge

  • The application of failure mode diagrams for exploring the roles of fluid pressure and stress states in controlling styles of fracture‐controlled permeability enhancement in faults and shear zones

    Stephen Cox

  • Structural and geochemical controls on the development of turbidite-hosted gold quartz vein deposits, Wattle Gully Mine, central Victoria, Australia

    S. F. Cox;S. S. Sun;M. A. Etheridge;V. J. Wall

  • Evolution of strength recovery and permeability during fluid–rock reaction in experimental fault zones

    Eric Tenthorey;Stephen F Cox;Hilary F Todd

  • The role of fluids in syntectonic mass transport, and the localization of metamorphic vein-type ore deposists

    S.F. Cox;M.A. Etheridge;V.J. Wall

  • Injection-Driven Swarm Seismicity and Permeability Enhancement: Implications for the Dynamics of Hydrothermal Ore Systems in High Fluid-Flux, Overpressured Faulting Regimes—An Invited Paper

    Stephen F. Cox

  • Deformational controls on the dynamics of fluid flow in mesothermal gold systems

    Stephen F. Cox

  • Rare earth and trace element mobility in mid-crustal shear zones: insights from the Mont Blanc Massif (Western Alps)

    Yann Rolland;Stephen Cox;Anne-Marie Boullier;Giorgio Pennacchioni

  • Fault-segment rupture, aftershock-zone fluid flow, and mineralization

    Steven Micklethwaite;Stephen F. Cox

  • Antitaxial crack-seal vein microstructures and their relationship to displacement paths

    Stephen F Cox

  • Cohesive strengthening of fault zones during the interseismic period: An experimental study

    Eric Tenthorey;Stephen F. Cox

  • Fault-valve behaviour in optimally oriented shear zones: an example at the Revenge gold mine, Kambalda, Western Australia

    Phung T Nguyen;Lyal B Harris;Chris McA Powell;Stephen F Cox

  • Coupled grain-scale dilatancy and mass transfer during deformation at high fluid pressures: examples from Mount Lyell, Tasmania

    S.F Cox;M.A Etheridge

  • The influence of room temperature deformation on porosity and permeability in calcite aggregates

    Shuqing Zhang;Stephen F. Cox;Mervyn S. Paterson

  • The St Ives mesothermal gold system, Western Australia: a case of golden aftershocks?

    Stephen Cox;K Ruming

Frequent Co-Authors

M. A. Etheridge
M. A. Etheridge Monash University
János Urai
János Urai RWTH Aachen University
Anne-Marie Boullier
Anne-Marie Boullier Grenoble Alpes University
Yann Rolland
Yann Rolland Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Giorgio Pennacchioni
Giorgio Pennacchioni University of Padua
Olivier Vidal
Olivier Vidal Grenoble Alpes University
John D. Fitz Gerald
John D. Fitz Gerald Australian National University
Jean Braun
Jean Braun University of Potsdam
Michael K. Gagan
Michael K. Gagan Australian National University
Mark A. Knackstedt
Mark A. Knackstedt Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to diverse educational paths, including unique cross-disciplinary opportunities. For those interested in blending creative skills with scientific knowledge, programs like photography programs online for veterans offer specialized training that can enhance environmental documentation and fieldwork reporting.

Language skills can also expand career horizons in Earth Science, especially with global collaboration becoming essential. Many students consider online Spanish degree for military veterans as a flexible option to gain proficiency, which is valuable in regions heavily influenced by Spanish-speaking communities.

Additionally, focused short programs like those featured in short Spanish degrees can fast-track language acquisition, making it easier for Earth Science professionals to communicate and collaborate internationally.

For those pursuing creative aspects alongside scientific research, online offerings such as online MFA creative writing programs provide invaluable skills in effectively communicating complex scientific concepts to broader audiences.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen F. Cox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles