World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
5319
World Ranking
13937
National Ranking
5540

Salah E. Elmaghraby publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salah E. Elmaghraby sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 115 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Salah E. Elmaghraby D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salah E. Elmaghraby sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

Salah E. Elmaghraby was affiliated with North Carolina State University in the United States. Their academic and research career included work recognized by professional organizations in the field of operations research and management sciences.

In 2004, Salah E. Elmaghraby was named a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS). This honor reflects involvement and contributions to this professional research community over the course of their career.

Data on specific research topics, publication venues, co-authors, recent papers, and subfields of study are not available. No detailed record of book publications or main topics of research work has been provided.

Best Publications

  • The Economic Lot Scheduling Problem (ELSP): Review and Extensions

    Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • Activity networks: Project planning and control by network models

    Salah Eldin Elmaghraby

  • Optimal procedures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks

    Erik L. Demeulemeester;Willy S. Herroelen;Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • The Analysis of Activity Networks Under Generalized Precedence Relations GPRs

    Salah E. Elmaghraby;Jerzy Kamburowski

  • Activity nets: A guided tour through some recent developments

    Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • On criticality and sensitivity in activity networks

    Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • The scheduling of activities to maximize the net present value of projects

    Salah E. Elmaghraby;Willy S. Herroelen

  • Scheduling Jobs on a Number of Identical Machines

    Salah E. Elmaghraby;Sung H. Park

  • Resource allocation via dynamic programming in activity networks

    Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • An Algebra for the Analysis of Generalized Activity Networks

    Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • A hybrid three-stage flowshop problem : Efficient heuristics to minimize makespan

    Fouad Riane;Abdelhakim Artiba;Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • On the Expected Duration of PERT Type Networks

    Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • The machine sequencing problem – review and extensions

    Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • Approximating the Criticality Indices of the Activities in PERT Networks

    Bajis M. Dodin;Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • On the fallacy of averages in project risk management

    Salah E. Elmaghraby

  • Economic manufacturing quantities under conditions of learning and forgetting (EMQ/LaF)

    Salah E. Elm'aghraby

  • SCHEDULING HYBRID FLOWSHOPS IN PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD ASSEMBLY LINES

    Z. H. Jin;K. Ohno;T. Ito;S. E. Elmaghraby

  • On the measurement of complexity in activity networks

    Salah E. Elmaghraby;Willy S. Herroelen

  • The planning and scheduling of production systems : methodologies and applications

    A Artiba;Salah Eldin Elmaghraby

  • Adaptive resource allocation in multimodal activity networks

    Anabela Pereira Tereso;Maria Madalena Teixeira de Araújo;Salah Elmaghraby

  • The economic lot scheduling problem under power-of-two policy

    Ming-Jong Yao;S.E. Elmaghraby

  • The Planning and Scheduling of Production Systems

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Mladen A. Vouk
Mladen A. Vouk North Carolina State University
Sven Axsäter
Sven Axsäter Lund University
Andrew B. Whinston
Andrew B. Whinston The University of Texas at Austin
Shimon Y. Nof
Shimon Y. Nof Purdue University West Lafayette
Roel Leus
Roel Leus KU Leuven
August-Wilhelm Scheer
August-Wilhelm Scheer Saarland University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a wide array of flexible online degree options and evolving career pathways. For students seeking an affordable route, exploring the cheapest online bachelor degree programs can help reduce educational costs while building a strong foundation for tech-related roles.

Many universities now offer distance learning options for other STEM fields as well. If you're interested in fields like software engineering or systems architecture, you may be wondering, can you get an engineering degree online? The answer is yes—online engineering degrees are increasingly accessible and popular.

For those aiming for leadership roles, an online executive mba can help professionals expand their management skills and boost career advancement, especially in tech-driven industries.

Additionally, students interested in data management, digital archiving, or information systems may consider pursuing an online mlis degree, aligning technology expertise with informational sciences.

These diverse online pathways offer flexibility and affordability, equipping graduates with the skills needed for success in today’s competitive digital landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Salah E. Elmaghraby

Recently Published Articles