World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
7599
World Ranking
5600
National Ranking
288

Roberto Cilia publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Cilia sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Roberto Cilia D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Cilia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The modern pre-levodopa era of Parkinson’s disease: insights into motor complications from sub-Saharan Africa

    Roberto Cilia;Albert Akpalu;Fred Stephen Sarfo;Momodou Cham

  • Continuous theta burst stimulation of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces changes in impulsivity level.

    Sang Soo Cho;Ji Hyun Ko;Giovanna Pellecchia;Giovanna Pellecchia;Thilo Van Eimeren;Thilo Van Eimeren

  • Reduced dopamine transporter density in the ventral striatum of patients with Parkinson's disease and pathological gambling

    Roberto Cilia;Ji Hyun Ko;Sang Soo Cho;Thilo van Eimeren

  • Drug-induced deactivation of inhibitory networks predicts pathological gambling in PD

    T. van Eimeren;G. Pellecchia;R. Cilia;B. Ballanger

  • Effects of COVID-19 on Parkinson's Disease Clinical Features: A Community-Based Case-Control Study.

    Roberto Cilia;Salvatore Bonvegna;Giulia Straccia;Nico Golfrè Andreasi

  • Natural history of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease and the long-duration response to levodopa.

    Roberto Cilia;Emanuele Cereda;Albert Akpalu;Fred Stephen Sarfo

  • Functional Abnormalities Underlying Pathological Gambling in Parkinson Disease

    Roberto Cilia;Chiara Siri;Giorgio Marotta;Ioannis U. Isaias

  • Pathological gambling in patients with Parkinson's disease is associated with fronto-striatal disconnection: a path modeling analysis.

    Roberto Cilia;Roberto Cilia;Sang Soo Cho;Sang Soo Cho;Thilo van Eimeren;Thilo van Eimeren;Giorgio Marotta

  • Glucocerebrosidase mutations and synucleinopathies: Toward a model of precision medicine.

    Fabio Blandini;Roberto Cilia;Silvia Cerri;Gianni Pezzoli

  • Behavioural adverse effects of dopaminergic treatments in Parkinson's disease: incidence, neurobiological basis, management and prevention.

    Angelo Antonini;Roberto Cilia

  • Cerebral blood flow changes induced by pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: A [15O] H2O PET study

    Benedicte Ballanger;Andres M. Lozano;Andres M. Lozano;Elena Moro;Thilo van Eimeren;Thilo van Eimeren

  • Mucuna pruriens in Parkinson disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover study

    Roberto Cilia;Janeth Laguna;Erica Cassani;Emanuele Cereda

  • LRRK2 G2019S mutation and Parkinson's disease: a clinical, neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric study in a large Italian sample.

    Stefano Goldwurm;Michela Zini;Alessio Di Fonzo;Alessio Di Fonzo;Danilo De Gaspari

  • Dopamine Transporter SPECT Imaging in Corticobasal Syndrome

    Roberto Cilia;Carlo Rossi;Daniela Frosini;Duccio Volterrani

  • Molecular imaging to track Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonisms: New imaging frontiers

    Antonio P. Strafella;Nicolaas I. Bohnen;Joel S. Perlmutter;David Eidelberg

  • Surgical, Medical, and Hardware Adverse Events in a Series of 141 Patients Undergoing Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease

    Francesco Vergani;Andrea Landi;David Pirillo;Roberto Cilia

  • Imaging essential tremor.

    Ioannis U. Isaias;Giorgio Marotta;Shigeki Hirano;Margherita Canesi

  • Impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease: seeking a roadmap toward a better understanding

    Roberto Cilia;Thilo van Eimeren

  • Brain networks underlining verbal fluency decline during STN-DBS in Parkinson's disease: an ECD-SPECT study.

    Roberto Cilia;Chiara Siri;Giorgio Marotta;Danilo De Gaspari

  • Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index: diagnostic accuracy of a fully automated algorithm in comparison with the manual measurement in a large Italian multicentre study in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy

    Salvatore Nigro;Gennarina Arabia;Angelo Antonini;Luca Weis

Frequent Co-Authors

Gianni Pezzoli
Gianni Pezzoli University of Milan
Angelo Antonini
Angelo Antonini University of Padua
Ioannis U. Isaias
Ioannis U. Isaias University of Würzburg
Rosanna Asselta
Rosanna Asselta Humanitas University
Roberto Eleopra
Roberto Eleopra Misericordia University
Antonio P. Strafella
Antonio P. Strafella University of Toronto
Thilo van Eimeren
Thilo van Eimeren University of Cologne
Stefano Duga
Stefano Duga Humanitas University
Roberto Ceravolo
Roberto Ceravolo University of Pisa
Ubaldo Bonuccelli
Ubaldo Bonuccelli University of Pisa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Cilia

Recently Published Articles