World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
44
Citations
6053
World Ranking
5940
National Ranking
318

Rahman Daiyan publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rahman Daiyan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 109 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Rahman Daiyan D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rahman Daiyan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Tuning the Coordination Structure of CuNC Single Atom Catalysts for Simultaneous Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 and NO3– to Urea

    Unknown

  • Nitrate reduction to ammonium: from CuO defect engineering to waste NOx-to-NH3 economic feasibility

    Rahman Daiyan;Thanh Tran-Phu;Thanh Tran-Phu;Priyank Kumar;Kevin Iputera

  • A hybrid plasma electrocatalytic process for sustainable ammonia production

    Jing Sun;David Alam;Rahman Daiyan;Hassan Masood

  • Opportunities and Challenges for Renewable Power-to-X

    Rahman Daiyan;Iain MacGill;Rose Amal

  • Techno-economic Analysis of Hydrogen Electrolysis from Off-Grid Stand-Alone Photovoltaics Incorporating Uncertainty Analysis

    Jonathon Yates;Rahman Daiyan;Robert Patterson;Renate Egan

  • A framework for assessing economics of blue hydrogen production from steam methane reforming using carbon capture storage & utilisation

    Muhammad Haider Ali Khan;Rahman Daiyan;Peter Neal;Nawshad Haque

  • Electroreduction of CO2 to CO on a Mesoporous Carbon Catalyst with Progressively Removed Nitrogen Moieties

    Rahman Daiyan;Xin Tan;Rui Chen;Wibawa Hendra Saputera

  • Nanostructured β-Bi2O3 Fractals on Carbon Fibers for Highly Selective CO2 Electroreduction to Formate

    Thanh Tran‐Phu;Rahman Daiyan;Zelio Fusco;Zhipeng Ma

  • A Disquisition on the Active Sites of Heterogeneous Catalysts for Electrochemical Reduction of CO 2 to Value‐Added Chemicals and Fuel

    Rahman Daiyan;Wibawa Hendra Saputera;Wibawa Hendra Saputera;Hassan Masood;Josh Leverett

  • Alternatives to Water Photooxidation for Photoelectrochemical Solar Energy Conversion and Green H2 Production

    Unknown

  • A green hydrogen credit framework for international green hydrogen trading towards a carbon neutral future

    Zhao Yang Dong;Jiajia Yang;Li Yu;Rahman Daiyan

  • Highly Selective Reduction of CO2 to Formate at Low Overpotentials Achieved by a Mesoporous Tin Oxide Electrocatalyst

    Rahman Daiyan;Xunyu Lu;Wibawa Hendra Saputera;Yun Hau Ng

  • Shipping the sunshine: An open-source model for costing renewable hydrogen transport from Australia

    Unknown

  • Impurity Tolerance of Unsaturated Ni-N-C Active Sites for Practical Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

    Unknown

  • Defective Metal Oxides: Lessons from CO2RR and Applications in NOxRR

    Unknown

  • Electronically Modified Atomic Sites Within a Multicomponent Co/Cu Composite for Efficient Oxygen Electroreduction

    Qingran Zhang;Priyank Kumar;Xiaofeng Zhu;Rahman Daiyan

  • Modulating Activity through Defect Engineering of Tin Oxides for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

    Rahman Daiyan;Emma Catherine Lovell;Nicholas M. Bedford;Wibawa Hendra Saputera;Wibawa Hendra Saputera

  • Advantages of eutectic alloys for creating catalysts in the realm of nanotechnology-enabled metallurgy

    Jianbo Tang;Rahman Daiyan;Mohammad B. Ghasemian;Shuhada A. Idrus-Saidi

  • Designing Undercoordinated Ni-Nx and Fe-Nx on Holey Graphene for Electrochemical CO2 Conversion to Syngas.

    Josh Leverett;Rahman Daiyan;Lele Gong;Kevin Iputera

  • Understanding the activity and stability of flame-made Co3O4 spinels: A route towards the scalable production of highly performing OER electrocatalysts

    Thanh Tran-Phu;Thanh Tran-Phu;Rahman Daiyan;Joshua Leverett;Zelio Fusco

Frequent Co-Authors

Rose Amal
Rose Amal University of New South Wales
Antonio Tricoli
Antonio Tricoli University of Sydney
Yun Hau Ng
Yun Hau Ng City University of Hong Kong
Amir Razmjou
Amir Razmjou Edith Cowan University
Kourosh Kalantar-zadeh
Kourosh Kalantar-zadeh University of Sydney
Liming Dai
Liming Dai University of New South Wales
Hongjun Chen
Hongjun Chen Australian National University
Iain MacGill
Iain MacGill University of New South Wales
Zhao Jun Han
Zhao Jun Han University of New South Wales
Ru-Shi Liu
Ru-Shi Liu National Taiwan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Rahman Daiyan

Recently Published Articles