World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 34 2967 2656 16 16 145 3314

Muhammad Imran Asjad publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Muhammad Imran Asjad between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Muhammad Imran Asjad published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 13.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2022. 48 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2022. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 49 publications 2022: 55 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 19 publications
2010 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Muhammad Imran Asjad: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 3
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 3
2017 2
2018 5
2019 6
2020 18
2021 49
2022 55
2023 24
2024 29
2025 19
Total 215
Download as CSV

Muhammad Imran Asjad publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muhammad Imran Asjad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–146 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 145 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112 145
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Muhammad Imran Asjad D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muhammad Imran Asjad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136 34
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Hybrid nanofluid flow within the conical gap between the cone and the surface of a rotating disk.

    Taza Gul;Kashifullah;M Bilal;Wajdi Alghamdi

  • Unsteady thermal transport flow of Casson nanofluids with generalized Mittag–Leffler kernel of Prabhakar's type

    Fuzhang Wang;Fuzhang Wang;Muhammad Imran Asjad;Muhammad Zahid;Azhar Iqbal

  • Effects of hybrid nanofluid on novel fractional model of heat transfer flow between two parallel plates

    Muhammad Danish Ikram;Muhammad Imran Asjad;Ali Akgül;Dumitru Baleanu;Dumitru Baleanu

  • Numerical computation of buoyancy and radiation effects on MHD micropolar nanofluid flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet with heat source

    Saif Ur Rehman;Amna Mariam;Asmat Ullah;Muhammad Imran Asjad

  • MHD Influence on different water based nanofluids (TiO2, Al2O3, CuO) in porous medium with chemical reaction and newtonian heating

    Maryam Aleem;Muhammad Imran Asjad;Aqila Shaheen;Ilyas Khan

  • Wall slip and non-integer order derivative effects on the heat transfer flow of Maxwell fluid over an oscillating vertical plate with new definition of fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives

    Madeeha Tahir;M.A. Imran;N. Raza;M. Abdullah

  • Numerical analysis of thermal conductive hybrid nanofluid flow over the surface of a wavy spinning disk.

    Ali Ahmadian;Muhammad Bilal;Muhammad Altaf Khan;Muhammad Imran Asjad

  • Explicit Soliton Structure Formation for the Riemann Wave Equation and a Sensitive Demonstration

    Unknown

  • Heat transfer analysis of fractional second-grade fluid subject to Newtonian heating with Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives: A comparison

    Muhammad Imran Asjad;Nehad Ali Shah;Maryam Aleem;Ilyas Khan

  • Construction of optical solitons of Radhakrishnan–Kundu–Lakshmanan equation in birefringent fibers

    Unknown

  • MHD Williamson Nanofluid Flow over a Slender Elastic Sheet of Irregular Thickness in the Presence of Bioconvection.

    Fuzhang Wang;Muhammad Imran Asjad;Saif Ur Rehman;Bagh Ali

  • Convective flow of a Maxwell hybrid nanofluid due to pressure gradient in a channel

    Rizwan Ali;Muhammad Imran Asjad;Ali Aldalbahi;Mohammad Rahimi-Gorji

  • New trends of fractional modeling and heat and mass transfer investigation of (SWCNTs and MWCNTs)-CMC based nanofluids flow over inclined plate with generalized boundary conditions

    Muhammad Imran Asjad;Maryam Aleem;Ali Ahmadian;Soheil Salahshour

  • Prabhakar fractional derivative and its applications in the transport phenomena containing nanoparticles

    Unknown

  • Heat transfer analysis of channel flow of MHD Jeffrey fluid subject to generalized boundary conditions

    Maryam Aleem;Muhammad Imran Asjad;Ali Ahmadian;Mehdi Salimi

  • On soliton solutions of fractional-order nonlinear model appears in physical sciences

    Unknown

  • Heatline visualization of MHD natural convection heat transfer of nanofluid in a prismatic enclosure.

    Tarikul Islam;Md. Nur Alam;Muhammad Imran Asjad;Nazma Parveen

  • Significance of Brownian motion and thermophoresis influence on dynamics of Reiner-Rivlin fluid over a disk with non-Fourier heat flux theory and gyrotactic microorganisms: A Numerical approach

    Bagh Ali;Liaqat Ali;Sohaib Abdal;Muhammad Imran Asjad

  • Explicit propagating electrostatic potential waves formation and dynamical assessment of generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili modified equal width-Burgers model with sensitivity and modulation instability gain spectrum visualization

    Unknown

  • Influence of hybrid nanofluids and heat generation on coupled heat and mass transfer flow of a viscous fluid with novel fractional derivative

    Yu-Ming Chu;Muhammad Danish Ikram;Muhammad Imran Asjad;Ali Ahmadian

Frequent Co-Authors

Ali Akgül
Ali Akgül Siirt University
Ali Ahmadian
Ali Ahmadian University of Waterloo
Dumitru Baleanu
Dumitru Baleanu Lebanese American University
Abdul Basit
Abdul Basit University College London
Ilyas Khan
Ilyas Khan Majmaah University
Hijaz Ahmad
Hijaz Ahmad Near East University
Jan Awrejcewicz
Jan Awrejcewicz Lodz University of Technology
Bagh Ali
Bagh Ali Harbin Institute of Technology
Soheil Salahshour
Soheil Salahshour Istanbul Okan University
Nehad Ali Shah
Nehad Ali Shah Sejong University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. Many professionals complement their quantitative skills with business knowledge, making an MBA a popular choice. If you are considering further education, looking into mba programs that accept transfer credits can help you save time and money by applying previous coursework toward your new degree.

Data analytics is another rapidly growing field closely linked to mathematics. Pursuing a masters data analytics degree provides a strong foundation in managing and interpreting data, crucial for decision-making roles across industries.

For those balancing busy schedules or new to graduate studies, finding flexible and accessible options is key. The easiest mba programs and easiest mba online offer pathways that are more attainable without sacrificing the value of your education. These programs prioritize accessibility and can be a strategic step toward leadership roles where math skills are essential.

Integrating mathematics with business and analytics opens diverse career paths, from finance and technology to research and management. Exploring these related online degrees can greatly enhance your professional prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Muhammad Imran Asjad

Recently Published Articles