World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mehmet Akif Destek

Mehmet Akif Destek

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
40
Citations
7535
World Ranking
2287
National Ranking
7

Mehmet Akif Destek publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet Akif Destek sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 123 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Mehmet Akif Destek D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet Akif Destek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Avik Sinha

  • Investigation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for Ecological Footprint: The Role of Energy and Financial Development

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie

  • Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint.

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Recep Ulucak;Eyup Dogan

  • Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in emerging economies: Evidence from bootstrap panel causality

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Alper Aslan

  • The dynamic linkage between remittances, export diversification, education, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in top remittance-receiving countries

    Muhammad Wasif Zafar;Muhammad Mansoor Saleem;Mehmet Akif Destek;Abdullah Emre Caglar

  • An empirical note on comparison between resource abundance and resource dependence in resource abundant countries

    Muhammad Shahbaz;Mehmet Akif Destek;Ilyas Okumus;Avik Sinha

  • Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Alper Aslan

  • Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs

    Mehmet Akif Destek

  • Renewable energy consumption and economic growth in newly industrialized countries: Evidence from asymmetric causality test

    Mehmet Akif Destek

  • Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: evidence from BEM economies

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Muge Manga

  • Does pollution haven hypothesis hold in newly industrialized countries? Evidence from ecological footprint

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Ilyas Okumus

  • Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA.

    Alper Aslan;Mehmet Akif Destek;Ilyas Okumus

  • Natural gas consumption and economic growth: Panel evidence from OECD countries

    Mehmet Akif Destek

  • Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie;Ernest Frimpong Asamoah

  • Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus in G7: fresh evidence from CS-ARDL.

    Ilyas Okumus;Arif Eser Guzel;Mehmet Akif Destek

  • The Relationship between CO2 Emission, Energy Consumption, Urbanization and Trade Openness for Selected CEECs

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Esra Balli;Muge Manga

  • Environmental effect of clean energy research and development investments: Evidence from Japan by using load capacity factor

    Unknown

  • Time-Varying Impact of Financial Development on Carbon Emissions in G-7 Countries: Evidence from the Long History

    Muhammad Shahbaz;Mehmet Akif Destek;Kangyin Dong;Zhilun Jiao

  • The relationship between financial development and income inequality in Turkey

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Avik Sinha;Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie

  • Relationships between economic growth, energy consumption, globalization, urbanization and environmental degradation in Turkey

    Mehmet Akif Destek;Ferda Nakipoglu Ozsoy

Frequent Co-Authors

Muhammad Shahbaz
Muhammad Shahbaz Beijing Institute of Technology
Avik Sinha
Avik Sinha Management Development Institute
Eyup Dogan
Eyup Dogan Abdullah Gül University
Recep Ulucak
Recep Ulucak Erciyes University
Shawkat Hammoudeh
Shawkat Hammoudeh Drexel University
Kangyin Dong
Kangyin Dong University of International Business and Economics
Abdullah Emre Caglar
Abdullah Emre Caglar Atatürk University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mehmet Akif Destek

Recently Published Articles