World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mathew Magimai.-Doss

Mathew Magimai.-Doss

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5848
World Ranking
13441
National Ranking
214

Mathew Magimai.-Doss publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew Magimai.-Doss sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mathew Magimai.-Doss D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew Magimai.-Doss sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2007 (ICASSP 2007)

    K. Livescu;A. Bezman;N. Borges;L. Yung

  • ANALYSIS OF CNN-BASED SPEECH RECOGNITION SYSTEM USING RAW SPEECH AS INPUT

    Dimitri Palaz;Mathew Magimai-Doss;Ronan Collobert

  • Convolutional Neural Networks-based continuous speech recognition using raw speech signal

    Dimitri Palaz;Mathew Magimai.-Doss;Ronan Collobert

  • Articulatory Feature-Based Methods for Acoustic and Audio-Visual Speech Recognition: Summary from the 2006 JHU Summer workshop

    K. Livescu;O. Cetin;M. Hasegawa-Johnson;S. King

  • End-to-end acoustic modeling using convolutional neural networks for HMM-based automatic speech recognition

    Dimitri Palaz;Dimitri Palaz;Mathew Magimai-Doss;Ronan Collobert;Ronan Collobert

  • Towards Directly Modeling Raw Speech Signal for Speaker Verification Using CNNS

    Unknown

  • Analysis of MLP-Based Hierarchical Phoneme Posterior Probability Estimator

    Joel Pinto;Sivaram Garimella;Mathew Magimai-Doss;Hynek Hermansky

  • Juicer : A weighted finite-state transducer speech decoder

    Darren Moore;John Dines;Mathew Magimai Doss;Jithendra Vepa

  • Using KL-based Acoustic Models in a Large Vocabulary Recognition Task

    Guillermo Aradilla;Hervé Bourlard;Mathew Magimai.-Doss

  • The SRI-ICSI Spring 2007 Meeting and Lecture Recognition System.

    Andreas Stolcke;Xavier Anguera;Kofi Boakye;Özgür Çetin

  • Exploiting contextual information for improved phoneme recognition

    J. Pinto;B. Yegnanarayana;H. Hermansky;M. Magimai-Doss

  • Speech recognition with auxiliary information

    T.A. Stephenson;M.M. Doss;H. Bourlard

  • Articulatory Feature Classifiers Trained on 2000 hours of Telephone Speech

    Joe Frankel;Mathew Magimai-Doss;Simon King;Karen Livescu

  • The SRI-ICSI Spring 2007 Meeting and Lecture Recognition System

    Andreas Stolcke;Xavier Anguera;Kofi Boakye;Özgür Çetin

  • An Articulatory Feature-Based Tandem Approach and Factored Observation Modeling

    O. Cetin;A. Kantor;S. King;C. Bartels

  • A comparison of acoustic and linguistics methodologies for Alzheimer's dementia recognition

    Nicholas Cummins;Yilin Pan;Zhao Ren;Julian Fritsch

  • Improving speech translation with automatic boundary prediction.

    Evgeny Matusov;Dustin Hillard;Mathew Magimai-Doss;Dilek Z. Hakkani-Tür

  • End-to-End convolutional neural network-based voice presentation attack detection

    Hannah Muckenhirn;Mathew Magimai-Doss;Sebastien Marcel

  • On Joint Optimization of Automatic Speaker Verification and Anti-Spoofing in the Embedding Space

    Unknown

  • On Learning to Identify Genders from Raw Speech Signal Using CNNs.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Hervé Bourlard
Hervé Bourlard Idiap Research Institute
Sébastien Marcel
Sébastien Marcel Idiap Research Institute
Hynek Hermansky
Hynek Hermansky Johns Hopkins University
Ronan Collobert
Ronan Collobert Facebook (United States)
Daniel Gatica-Perez
Daniel Gatica-Perez Idiap Research Institute
Richard Bowden
Richard Bowden University of Surrey
Samy Bengio
Samy Bengio Apple (United States)
Dietrich Klakow
Dietrich Klakow Saarland University
Yicong Zhou
Yicong Zhou University of Macau

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mathew Magimai.-Doss

Recently Published Articles