World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
51
Citations
10735
World Ranking
3857
National Ranking
1668

Lynne M. Angerer publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne M. Angerer sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 91 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Lynne M. Angerer D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynne M. Angerer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lynne M. Angerer was affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research contributions are documented through publications primarily in the field of pathology.

One notable paper published by Lynne M. Angerer is titled Rare non-neoplastic gastrointestinal diseases-drugs and bugs, which appeared in the journal Die Pathologie in 2025.

The scientist frequently collaborated with other researchers, including Tobias Zauner.

Their work was published exclusively in the journal Die Pathologie, indicating a focused contribution within this specialized publication venue.

Best Publications

  • Detection of mRNAs in sea urchin embryos by in situ hybridization using asymmetric RNA probes

    Kathleen H. Cox;Donna V. DeLeon;Lynne M. Angerer;Robert C. Angerer

  • The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

    Erica Sodergren;George M. Weinstock;Eric H. Davidson;R. Andrew Cameron

  • Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III infection of the central nervous system. A preliminary in situ analysis.

    Mark H. Stoler;Thomas A. Eskin;Steven Benn;Robert C. Angerer

  • A Genomic View of the Sea Urchin Nervous System

    R. D. Burke;L. M. Angerer;M. R. Elphick;G. W. Humphrey

  • Demonstration of tissue-specific gene expression by in situ hybridization.

    Lynne M. Angerer;Kathleen H. Cox;Robert C. Angerer

  • Detection of poly A+ RNA in sea urchin eggs and embryos by quantitative in situ hybridization

    Lynne M. Angerer;Robert C. Angerer

  • Cell lineage-specific programs of expression of multiple actin genes during sea urchin embryogenesis.

    Kathleen H. Cox;Lynne M. Angerer;James J. Lee;Eric H. Davidson

  • Improved methods for the formation and stabilization of R-loops

    David B. Kaback;Lynne M. Angerer;Norman Davidson

  • A Wnt-FoxQ2-Nodal Pathway Links Primary and Secondary Axis Specification in Sea Urchin Embryos

    Shunsuke Yaguchi;Junko Yaguchi;Robert C. Angerer;Lynne M. Angerer

  • RTK and TGF-β signaling pathways genes in the sea urchin genome

    François Lapraz;Eric Röttinger;Véronique Duboc;Ryan Range

  • Early mRNAs, spatially restricted along the animal-vegetal axis of sea urchin embryos, include one encoding a protein related to tolloid and BMP-1.

    S.D. Reynolds;L.M. Angerer;J. Palis;A. Nasir

  • Animal–Vegetal Axis Patterning Mechanisms in the Early Sea Urchin Embryo

    Lynne M. Angerer;Robert C. Angerer

  • A BMP pathway regulates cell fate allocation along the sea urchin animal-vegetal embryonic axis.

    Lynne M. Angerer;David W. Oleksyn;Catriona Y. Logan;David R. McClay

  • Sea urchin goosecoid function links fate specification along the animal-vegetal and oral-aboral embryonic axes

    Lynne M. Angerer;David W. Oleksyn;Amy M. Levine;Xiaotao Li

  • Patterning the sea urchin embryo: gene regulatory networks, signaling pathways, and cellular interactions.

    Lynne M Angerer;Robert C Angerer

  • Localization of a family of MRNAS in a single cell type and its precursors in sea urchin embryos

    David A. Lynn;Lynne M. Angerer;Arthur M. Bruskin;William H. Klein

  • The sea urchin animal pole domain is a Six3-dependent neurogenic patterning center

    Zheng Wei;Junko Yaguchi;Shunsuke Yaguchi;Robert C. Angerer

  • Most early-variant histone mRNA is contained in the pronucleus of sea urchin eggs.

    Donna V. DeLeon;Kathleen H. Cox;Lynne M. Angerer;Robert C. Angerer

  • SpKrl: a direct target of beta-catenin regulation required for endoderm differentiation in sea urchin embryos.

    Eric W. Howard;Laurel A. Newman;David W. Oleksyn;Robert C. Angerer

  • An electron microscope study of the relative positions of the 4S and ribosomal RNA genes in HeLa cell mitochondrial DNA

    Lynne Angerer;Norman Davidson;William Murphy;Dennis Lynch

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert D. Burke
Robert D. Burke University of Victoria
William H. Klein
William H. Klein The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Kevin J. Peterson
Kevin J. Peterson Dartmouth College
Victor D. Vacquier
Victor D. Vacquier University of California, San Diego
Christine G. Elsik
Christine G. Elsik University of Missouri
Finn Hallböök
Finn Hallböök Uppsala University
Michael C. Thorndyke
Michael C. Thorndyke Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Eric H. Davidson
Eric H. Davidson California Institute of Technology
Arcady Mushegian
Arcady Mushegian National Science Foundation
Donna M. Muzny
Donna M. Muzny Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a range of interdisciplinary career pathways, especially within healthcare and life sciences. As the demand for skilled professionals continues to rise, students are increasingly considering alternative and affordable ways to achieve their goals through online degrees.

For those interested in patient care, several nursing programs without teas exams offer a streamlined admission process, allowing students to begin their nursing journey with fewer barriers. Alternatively, if administrative roles appeal to you, there are many mha online programs that are both flexible and cost-effective, helping you advance into healthcare management.

Busy learners seeking an accelerated route can consider shortest lpn program options online, allowing for a faster transition into the workforce. For nurses pursuing leadership or advanced clinical roles, the cheapest dnp programs online make advanced education more accessible and budget-friendly.

These related online degrees complement a background in genetics and can broaden your career options in research, patient care, or healthcare administration.

Best Scientists Citing Lynne M. Angerer