World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 49 14895 13419 406 355 168 7968

Laurel L. Schafer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laurel L. Schafer between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laurel L. Schafer published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2022. 6 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2022. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laurel L. Schafer: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 5
2007 4
2008 1
2009 7
2010 6
2011 8
2012 9
2013 14
2014 7
2015 10
2016 10
2017 12
2018 11
2019 10
2020 10
2021 12
2022 26
2023 18
2024 11
2025 5
2026 1
Total 207
Download as CSV

Laurel L. Schafer publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurel L. Schafer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 168 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350 168
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Laurel L. Schafer D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurel L. Schafer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835 49
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science
  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2007 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Laurel L. Schafer is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research spans several key areas within chemistry and materials science, focusing particularly on organic chemistry, materials chemistry, and inorganic chemistry. The scientist has published extensively with a strong emphasis on crystallization and solubility studies, X-ray diffraction in crystallography, catalytic C-H functionalization methods, asymmetric hydrogenation and catalysis, carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis, organoboron and organosilicon chemistry, and polymer composites and self-healing.

Recent publications by Laurel L. Schafer demonstrate involvement in diverse catalytic and synthetic chemistry topics. Notable recent papers include:

  • C-H activation, 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • Titanium catalysis for the synthesis of fine chemicals - development and trends, 2020, Chemical Society Reviews
  • Hydroaminoalkylation for the Catalytic Addition of Amines to Alkenes or Alkynes: Diverse Mechanisms Enable Diverse Substrate Scope, 2022, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Zirconium-Catalyzed Hydroaminoalkylation of Alkynes for the Synthesis of Allylic Amines, 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Direct, Catalytic α-Alkylation of N-Heterocycles by Hydroaminoalkylation: Substrate Effects for Regiodivergent Product Formation, 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society

Laurel L. Schafer has collaborated frequently with several researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Samuel E. Griffin
  • Erick Nuñez Bahena
  • Rebecca C. DiPucchio
  • Olivia V. Adamczyk
  • Savvas G. Hatzikiriakos

Their work appears regularly in multiple publication venues, including:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Organometallics
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • ACS Catalysis
  • Inorganic Chemistry

The scientist's contributions have been recognized by awards and fellowships such as:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, 2017
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2014
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, 2007

Best Publications

  • C–H activation

    Torben Rogge;Nikolaos Kaplaneris;Naoto Chatani;Jinwoo Kim

  • Chiral Neutral Zirconium Amidate Complexes for the Asymmetric Hydroamination of Alkenes

    Mark C. Wood;David C. Leitch;Charles S. Yeung;Jennifer A. Kozak

  • Intramolecular hydroamination of unactived olefins with Ti(NMe2)4 as a precatalyst.

    Jason A. Bexrud;J. David Beard;David C. Leitch;Laurel L. Schafer

  • Scandium-Catalyzed Intramolecular Hydroamination. Development of a Highly Active Cationic Catalyst

    Frank Lauterwasser;Paul G. Hayes;Stefan Bräse;Warren E. Piers

  • Selective C−H Activation α to Primary Amines. Bridging Metallaaziridines for Catalytic, Intramolecular α-Alkylation

    Jason A. Bexrud;Patrick Eisenberger;David C. Leitch;Philippa R. Payne

  • Anti-Markovnikov intermolecular hydroamination: a bis(amidate) titanium precatalyst for the preparation of reactive aldimines.

    Zhe Zhang;Laurel L. Schafer

  • Broadening the scope of group 4 hydroamination catalysis using a tethered ureate ligand.

    David C. Leitch;Philippa R. Payne;Christine R Dunbar;Laurel L. Schafer

  • Tantalum–Amidate Complexes for the Hydroaminoalkylation of Secondary Amines: Enhanced Substrate Scope and Enantioselective Chiral Amine Synthesis

    Patrick Eisenberger;Rashidat O. Ayinla;Jean Michel P. Lauzon;Laurel L. Schafer

  • Titanium catalysis for the synthesis of fine chemicals – development and trends

    Manfred Manßen;Laurel L Schafer

  • A Pentagonal Pyramidal Zirconium Imido Complex for Catalytic Hydroamination of Unactivated Alkenes

    Robert K. Thomson;Jason A. Bexrud;Laurel L. Schafer

  • An Easy‐To‐Use, Regioselective, and Robust Bis(amidate) Titanium Hydroamination Precatalyst: Mechanistic and Synthetic Investigations toward the Preparation of Tetrahydroisoquinolines and Benzoquinolizine Alkaloids

    Zhe Zhang;David C. Leitch;Man Lu;Brian O. Patrick

  • Phosphoramidate Tantalum Complexes for Room‐Temperature CH Functionalization: Hydroaminoalkylation Catalysis

    Pierre Garcia;Ying Yin Lau;Mitchell R. Perry;Laurel L. Schafer

  • N,O-Chelating Four-Membered Metallacyclic Titanium(IV) Complexes for Atom-Economic Catalytic Reactions.

    Scott A Ryken;Laurel L Schafer

  • Early transition metal-catalyzed C–H alkylation: hydroaminoalkylation for Csp3–Csp3 bond formation in the synthesis of selectively substituted amines

    P. M. Edwards;L. L. Schafer

  • Redundant CAMTA Transcription Factors Negatively Regulate the Biosynthesis of Salicylic Acid and N-Hydroxypipecolic Acid by Modulating the Expression of SARD1 and CBP60g.

    Tongjun Sun;Jianhua Huang;Yan Xu;Vani Verma

  • Hydroaminoalkylation: Early-Transition-Metal-Catalyzed α-Alkylation of Amines

    Eugene Chong;Pierre Garcia;Laurel L. Schafer

  • Amidate complexes of titanium and zirconium: a new class of tunable precatalysts for the hydroamination of alkynes.

    Chunyu Li;Robert K. Thomson;Bronwyn Gillon;Brian O. Patrick

  • Efficient Anti-Markovnikov-Selective Catalysts for Intermolecular Alkyne Hydroamination: Recent Advances and Synthetic Applications

    Jacky C. H. Yim;Laurel L. Schafer

  • Mechanistic Elucidation of Intramolecular Aminoalkene Hydroamination Catalyzed by a Tethered Bis(ureate) Complex: Evidence for Proton-Assisted C–N Bond Formation at Zirconium

    David C Leitch;Rachel H Platel;Laurel L Schafer

  • 2-Pyridonate Tantalum Complexes for the Intermolecular Hydroaminoalkylation of Sterically Demanding Alkenes

    Eugene Chong;Jason W. Brandt;Laurel L. Schafer

  • Modular N,O‐Chelating Ligands: Group‐4 Amidate Complexes for Catalytic Hydroamination

    Alison V. Lee;Laurel L. Schafer

Frequent Co-Authors

Savvas G. Hatzikiriakos
Savvas G. Hatzikiriakos University of British Columbia
Brian O. Patrick
Brian O. Patrick University of British Columbia
Warren E. Piers
Warren E. Piers University of Calgary
Han Hao
Han Hao Tsinghua University
Stefan Bräse
Stefan Bräse Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Antonio Togni
Antonio Togni ETH Zurich
Robert H. Morris
Robert H. Morris University of Toronto
Odile Eisenstein
Odile Eisenstein University of Montpellier
Guy C. Lloyd-Jones
Guy C. Lloyd-Jones University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Chemistry opens doors to a variety of related fields, particularly within forensic science and psychology. For those interested in forensic applications, exploring online colleges for forensic science can provide flexible and affordable education options. These programs combine chemistry knowledge with investigative techniques, preparing students for specialized roles in criminal investigations.

Another promising pathway is obtaining an online master's degree in forensic psychology. This advanced degree integrates psychological principles with legal matters and crime analysis, complementing a background in chemistry by enhancing understanding of behavioral evidence.

Career opportunities in this space are diverse. For instance, becoming an autopsy technician involves precise chemical and biological expertise. Understanding how much do autopsy techs make and the necessary qualifications can help students assess the viability of this career path.

Exploring various forensic career paths reveals roles such as crime lab analyst, forensic chemist, and crime scene investigator. Studying Chemistry is a solid foundation for these professions, merging scientific expertise with real-world impact in justice and law enforcement.

Best Scientists Citing Laurel L. Schafer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles